35mm f/1.8 dx lens for Nikon D3400 (Page 2): You know, that is a sore spot to me, not having perfect technique and being spoiled by VR, I always wondered why the 35 & 50 mm Nikon...

coj Loc: NJ, USA

CO wrote:

Are you going to be handholding the camera a lot? The reason I ask is because Tamron's new SP series prime lenses all have vibration compensation. They also have a metal lens barrel and are fully weather sealed. I purchased the 45mm f/1.8 for my Nikons. I use it a lot for model photo shoots. The vibration compensation helps to get steady shots. The new lenses are the 35mm f/1.8, 45mm f/1.8, 85mm f/1.8, and 90mm f/2.8 macro.

You know, that is a sore spot to me, not having perfect technique and being spoiled by VR, I always wondered why the 35 & 50 mm Nikon lenses had no VR. Not that I use my 50mm 1.8 that much, and usually it is with a tripod, I wish that it had VR...

CO

coj wrote:

You know, that is a sore spot to me, not having perfect technique and being spoiled by VR, I always wondered why the 35 & 50 mm Nikon lenses had no VR. Not that I use my 50mm 1.8 that much, and usually it is with a tripod, I wish that it had VR...

I know some people say that stabilization is not necessary with lenses that have a short focal length. I think it can still be of help. I took this photo with my Tamron 45mm f/1.8 SP VC lens. I was hand holding the camera. The shutter speed was 1/30 second. It looks steady and free of camera shake. I don't think the shot would have been this steady with a non stabilized lens even using great technique.

1/30 second shutter speed
1/30 second shutter speed...

(Download)

foggypreacher Loc: Dickinson, Texas

https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Delectronics&field-keywords=Nikon+35mm+f%2F1.8+G+DX+AF-S+Nikkor+Lens+with+3+Filters+%2B+Flash+%26+2+Diffusers+Kit+for+%24240

THis is the link for the above you asked about.

coj Loc: NJ, USA

CO wrote:

I know some people say that stabilization is not necessary with lenses that have a short focal length. I think it can still be of help. I took this photo with my Tamron 45mm f/1.8 SP VC lens. I was hand holding the camera. The shutter speed was 1/30 second. It looks steady and free of camera shake. I don't think the shot would have been this steady with a non stabilized lens even using great technique.

Excellent pic. I agree, without VR or IS unless you have very good technique at that speed, it's tough.

hookedupin2005 Loc: Northwestern New Mexico

CO wrote:

I know some people say that stabilization is not necessary with lenses that have a short focal length. I think it can still be of help. I took this photo with my Tamron 45mm f/1.8 SP VC lens. I was hand holding the camera. The shutter speed was 1/30 second. It looks steady and free of camera shake. I don't think the shot would have been this steady with a non stabilized lens even using great technique.

Just a little off subject to the main topic here, but I really like the photo.... But, her legs look "dirty", or bruised up to me. Anyone else notice that?

Largobob

LWW wrote:

I’m being an old codger here, but VR on a 35 is marketing fluff and no more ... other than to those who have never learned basic hand held skills IMHO.

My $0.02, YMMV.

VR on a 35mm is not necessary.

billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont

foggypreacher wrote:

I have been reading reviews online, and talking with a Nikon saleman at Best Buy about a lens for a prime lens. This is one that he recommended. I have seen the prices for certified refurbished at around $90, to $154.99 and in between. Is this good as a prime lens or are there others than just the Nikon lenses? Thanks to all in advance for any advice.

This Nikon lens is probably the cheapest SHARPEST lens Nikon has ever produced. You will not be disappointed.

Thrawn John Loc: Scotland

Had this lens for a few years now.
So sharp even a Pro mate went "Shiinggg!!! This is SHARP!"
Pretty fast, plenty of opportunity for shallow Depth of Field.
Chromatic Aberration is pretty bad but easily resolved completely in post.

Thrawn John Loc: Scotland

It would, with a steady hand.
IS not necessarily "necessary" for a lot of people but, yep, can be handy.

CO wrote:

I know some people say that stabilization is not necessary with lenses that have a short focal length. I think it can still be of help. I took this photo with my Tamron 45mm f/1.8 SP VC lens. I was hand holding the camera. The shutter speed was 1/30 second. It looks steady and free of camera shake. I don't think the shot would have been this steady with a non stabilized lens even using great technique.

Chadp Loc: Virginia Beach

This is the lens that stays on my D5500 for indoor shots of my kids. I am very pleased with it. However, it is my second copy. I bought my first one used off of EBay. I could not produce as sharp of photos as my kit lens with the used lens. I guess someone else wasn’t happy with it either and that’s why it was on EBay. With all the positive reviews I figured I must have just purchased a bad one. So I went to Best Buy and bought I new one. For only another $60 new vs used I should have just bought it New the first time.

jccash Loc: Longwood, Florida

foggypreacher wrote:

I have been reading reviews online, and talking with a Nikon saleman at Best Buy about a lens for a prime lens. This is one that he recommended. I have seen the prices for certified refurbished at around $90, to $154.99 and in between. Is this good as a prime lens or are there others than just the Nikon lenses? Thanks to all in advance for any advice.

That is my favorite lens.

Orca Loc: Little Egg Harbor, NJ USA

I use that lens on my D5500. Purchased it new fro B&H. Use it most of the time. Great lens for the money.

adrenalin

agree

lamontcranston

foggypreacher wrote:

I have been reading reviews online, and talking with a Nikon saleman at Best Buy about a lens for a prime lens. This is one that he recommended. I have seen the prices for certified refurbished at around $90, to $154.99 and in between. Is this good as a prime lens or are there others than just the Nikon lenses? Thanks to all in advance for any advice.

Your salesman gave you good advice. The 35/ f1.8 dx was the 1st lens I bought for my D3300 and it remains my favorite prime lens. As others have said, you won't be disappointed with it. Great in low light, extremely sharp, and priced right.

gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast

I have this lens for my D7000. Been using it more and more for my walk around lens because it approximates my natural field of view and of course the large aperture for low light. And there's not much concern for camera shake with low shutter speeds because of the shortish focal length.