John N wrote:
I have a CANON 60D with a go to lens 15-85 often fitted. I am having trouble getting an accurate close focus whether I use AF or Manual. I may have (probably) knocked the lens a few times and suspect the lens is at fault. Are there any user adjustments that can be made or is the lens for the scrappy.
This lens seems to worn badly. It always was a little suspect if you wanted to photograph in the perpendicular but now it seems like it'll slide out in a breeze. Assuming I keep the lens is there way to fix this?
Finally, I'm hoping to get a 6D mk2 + 24-105 'L' but at 63 I'm not so sure. I see a few posts on here concerning the weight of cameras/lenses on older wrists. If I keep the 60D or get the 80D (as a replacement) what lenses would hoggers recommend I consider to replace the 15-85.
I have a CANON 60D with a go to lens 15-85 often f... (
show quote)
First, the EF-S 15-85mm IS USM is an excellent lens. It has a great range of focal lengths for use on a 60D, all in a single lens. It's also got very high image quality, decent build, fast USM autofocus and helpful image stabilization.
You are probably just trying to focus too close, less than the minimum distance possible with the lens. If so, you can make it focus closer by fitting a macro extension tube between the lens and camera (just won't be able to focus to infinity while that's installed). For it's quality and price I recommend the Kenko set that costs about $125 (there are cheaper in the $50 to $75 range, but they're more plasticky and don't have as secure latching mechanisms). The set includes 12mm, 20mm and 36mm tubes that can be used individually or in combinations. The more extension you add, the closer the lens can focus and the higher the magnification. There are also "close up lenses" that screw into the front of the lens... Canon makes high quality 72mm "500D" close-up lens that will fit that lens and allow it to focus closer.... but that costs $125 and is less versatile than the extension tubes (the close-up lens can only be used on lenses with 72mm filter threads... while the ext. tubes can be fitted behind ANY lens that mounts on the camera). Canon also makes very good macro extension tubes, but only sells individual 12mm and 25mm sizes. One of the 12mm costs $90, while one 25mm costs about $140. The Kenko are nearly equal quality and a better deal, since their $125 set includes three sizes.
If you shop for macro extension tubes, don't be tempted by the really cheap ones... $10 to $25. Those are "dumb tubes" that don't have the electronic contacts to allow the camera and lens to communicate with each other. As a result, there's no autofocus AND, even worse, there's no direct means of controlling the lens aperture. That type of tube can be used with vintage lenses that have mechanical aperture control ring on the lens itself... but they are a problem with modern lenses that use electronic aperture controlled via a dial on the camera body. There's a work around... but it's extremely slow and cumbersome to do. So just don't go too cheap with macro extension tubes!
If you do a lot of close-up and macro work, a true macro lens might be a better solution. Canon offers a fairly compact EF-S 60mm f/2.8 USM that's very good and costs about $470. Tamron also offers a very good, compact, 60mm macro. It's crop-only (fine on 60D, not on 6D) and has a larger f/2 aperture, but costs a little more ($525).
The other "problem" you are seeing with your lens sounds like "zoom creep". That's where the lens tends to self-extend while carrying it. That's all too common with zooms (the 24-105mm you mention does it too). Some lenses have a "zoom lock", but not the 15-85mm! A cheap solution is a large, wide rubber band partly on the zoom ring, to help prevent it from easily turning and letting the lens extend. You can buy one specially made for the purpose for $10... or go to the produce dept. of your local supermarket and ask the manager for one of the rubber bands they use on bunches of asparagus, etc. That will probably be free.
It may be possible to have the zoom mechanism worked on and tension added to it, so the lens won't self extend so easily (but there will be more tension on the zoom ring when you turn it). If you decide the lens needs service, you might ask about that too. But it will probably add some cost. (There are DIY ways to do this fix to some lenses, detailed online... But those risk ruining the lens if you aren't VERY careful and reasonably skilled, with the right tools and parts to do the job.)
No, I wouldn't recommend the EF 24-105L II. For one, your 15-85mm probably has better image quality and would cost less to replace with a new one: $800 for a 15-85mm versus $1100 for the 24-105L II or $1000 for the older version, which is still avail. new. And you'd be giving up useful wide angle focal lengths. The 24-105L II also will likely have the same "zoom creep" and won't focus any closer than your current lens (assuming nothing is actually wrong with your 15-85mm preventing it from reaching it's minimum focus distance).
The ONLY lens I'd recommend replacing the 15-85mm with would be the EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM. It's gonna cost about $900 and gives up a little focal length at both extremes... but it's incredibly close focusing with a built-in macro mode that can do .70X magnification without any need for extension tubes or a close-up lens. That's roughly triple the magnification possible with your 15-85mm (.21X) or the 24-105s (.23X). The 24-70mm f/4L also is very sharp... has almost as good quality as the even more upscale EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM II (which is a lot bigger, heavier and double the price).
However, with the 24-70mm you'll be losing the wide angle capabilities of the 15-85mm. If those are something you use a lot, you might need to complement the 24-70 with an ultrawide such as Canon's EF-S 10-18mm IS STM (under $300, cheap, light, plasticky, but good IQ and image stabilized) or EF-S 10-22mm USM ($600-ish, one of the best ultrawides made by anyone).
If you miss the 85mm "reach" of your lens, you might want to complement the 24-70mm with something longer, too. One solution would be a true macro lens such as one of Canon's two 100mm f/2.8 ($600 for the original USM model.... $900 for the "L" model with stabilization) either of which can optionally be fitted with tripod mounting rings, which is a nice feature exclusive to Canon around these focal lengths. Alternatives are the Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 ($500) or their more premium version with faster USD focus drive and image stabilization ($650).
Of course, with any of these option you end up with additional lenses to carry around instead of just one.
BTW: It doesn't help in this case, but some Canon cameras have Micro Focus Adjustment feature, where the user can make fine tuning adjustments to focus accuracy themselves. Unfortunately, Canon left that feature off the 60D (the 50D, 70D and 80D all have it).
Newer camera models also have a new and much faster method of auto focusing in Live View, which can be handy for close-up photography. Introduced on the 70D, Dual Pixel AF (DPAF) offers a big improvement in focusing speed over the contrast detection AF that earlier models use in Live View. IMO, that makes Live View a lot more useful.
Hope this helps!