Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
D4 vs. 850
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 10, 2018 20:36:52   #
Pretzel
 
I really like my D4. However, after reading all the hype and all the new bells and whistles, i.e., focus stacking, etc., I am thinking about trading my D4 for an 850. Does this make any sense? I am not the kind of photographer that needs the latest tech but if the improvements were compelling enough I would be willing to pay the cost difference.

Reply
Mar 10, 2018 20:57:03   #
Spirit Vision Photography Loc: Behind a Camera.
 
The D4 is more than enough to deliver superb results. Why chase technology, bells & whistles, when they do not improve your vision or images? Just my opinion.

SVP

Reply
Mar 10, 2018 21:01:27   #
Robeng Loc: California
 
Pretzel wrote:
I really like my D4. However, after reading all the hype and all the new bells and whistles, i.e., focus stacking, etc., I am thinking about trading my D4 for an 850. Does this make any sense? I am not the kind of photographer that needs the latest tech but if the improvements were compelling enough I would be willing to pay the cost difference.


I have a D4s & D800 at the time the D850 came out. At first I was going to hold off on the D850 until Nikon gave me one to play with. After using it for a couple of days I noticed all the great features the D850 had over the D800 it was a game changer for me. I purchased the D850 and love it.

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2018 21:18:00   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
Kiron Kid wrote:
The D4 is more than enough to deliver superb results. Why chase technology, bells & whistles, when they do not improve your vision or images? Just my opinion.

SVP


In camera focus stacking, time lapse and silent shutter. Tilt screen and illuminated back buttons, joystick sub selector. ISO 64 to 25,600. Nikon D5 focusing system, and 45 Mp resolution that has to be seen to be believed. 4K video, 7 fps without grip, 9 fps with grip. It is more than bells and whistles, it is a tool that will match your native capabilities and exceed them step by step.

Downside: It is a heavy bitch of a camera.

Reply
Mar 10, 2018 21:28:53   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
In camera focus stacking, time lapse and silent shutter. Tilt screen and illuminated back buttons, joystick sub selector. ISO 64 to 25,600. Nikon D5 focusing system, and 45 Mp resolution that has to be seen to be believed. 4K video, 7 fps without grip, 9 fps with grip. It is more than bells and whistles, it is a tool that will match your native capabilities and exceed them step by step.

Downside: It is a heavy bitch of a camera.


Its CONSIDERABLY lighter than a D4!

Reply
Mar 10, 2018 21:34:50   #
Robeng Loc: California
 
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
In camera focus stacking, time lapse and silent shutter. Tilt screen and illuminated back buttons, joystick sub selector. ISO 64 to 25,600. Nikon D5 focusing system, and 45 Mp resolution that has to be seen to be believed. 4K video, 7 fps without grip, 9 fps with grip. It is more than bells and whistles, it is a tool that will match your native capabilities and exceed them step by step.

Downside: It is a heavy bitch of a camera.


To get the 9 frames per second you have to purchase the grip adapter and use EN-EL18 batteries similar to the one used in the D5 & D4s. Just purchasing a grip won't work.

Reply
Mar 11, 2018 06:11:10   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Robeng wrote:
To get the 9 frames per second you have to purchase the grip adapter and use EN-EL18 batteries similar to the one used in the D5 & D4s. Just purchasing a grip won't work.


Yeah, that's been a real deal breaker for many. Nikon doesn't know what to do with all of their excess production.

Reply
 
 
Mar 11, 2018 07:26:53   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Pretzel wrote:
I really like my D4. However, after reading all the hype and all the new bells and whistles, i.e., focus stacking, etc., I am thinking about trading my D4 for an 850. Does this make any sense? I am not the kind of photographer that needs the latest tech but if the improvements were compelling enough I would be willing to pay the cost difference.


It's always tough deciding between to good items, especially when you can't have both. I don't have my links on this computer, but look for comparisons between the two.

https://www.google.com/search?q=camera+comparison+sites&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS729US729&oq=camera+comparison+sites&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.4127j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Reply
Mar 11, 2018 08:48:27   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
Here's the deal for me, though. If I spent 3 grand on a D850, I'd have to spend 3-4 grand on a lens to go with it, despite already having a 28-70 f2.8 and 70-200mm f2.8 (which aren't even on Thom Hogan's list of acceptable lenses for the D850!!). The question is, can I get this old carcass in shape enough to be worth shelling out 7 grand??

Reply
Mar 11, 2018 09:36:40   #
Spirit Vision Photography Loc: Behind a Camera.
 
When did bells & whistles replace Vision and skill? You already have what is more than sufficient to produce fantastic images. Put the money and time into honing your vision and skill. 👍

KK

Reply
Mar 11, 2018 10:20:02   #
Steve Perry Loc: Sylvania, Ohio
 
I've owned both. I LOVED my D4 (well, not as much as my D5, but still it's a great camera). That said, at least for my work, there's no way I'd use a D4 over my D850. Heck, even my D5 now takes a backseat to the D850 for most of my work.

Reply
 
 
Mar 11, 2018 10:27:21   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
SteveR wrote:
Here's the deal for me, though. If I spent 3 grand on a D850, I'd have to spend 3-4 grand on a lens to go with it, despite already having a 28-70 f2.8 and 70-200mm f2.8 (which aren't even on Thom Hogan's list of acceptable lenses for the D850!!). The question is, can I get this old carcass in shape enough to be worth shelling out 7 grand??


Hogan does not have a list of "acceptable" lenses for the D850. He has a list of "best" lenses for the D850, which he also calls recommended. The 28-70mm, superseded 10 years ago by the 24-70mm, did not make the cut but the newer versions of both the 24-70 f2.8 and the 70-200 f2.8 are on the best list.

Reply
Mar 11, 2018 13:19:41   #
BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA
 
Pretzel wrote:
I really like my D4. However, after reading all the hype and all the new bells and whistles, i.e., focus stacking, etc., I am thinking about trading my D4 for an 850. Does this make any sense? I am not the kind of photographer that needs the latest tech but if the improvements were compelling enough I would be willing to pay the cost difference.


In camer focus stacking produces a jpeg! If you don't use RAW that is no issue. You can also focus stack in LR and PS.

Reply
Mar 11, 2018 13:29:36   #
Rich1939 Loc: Pike County Penna.
 
BobHartung wrote:
In camer focus stacking produces a jpeg! If you don't use RAW that is no issue. You can also focus stack in LR and PS.


While I don't have the D850 (yet) I don't believe your contention that the
D850 only produces a .jpeg, rather than jpeg and/or raw

Reply
Mar 11, 2018 13:30:29   #
Steve Perry Loc: Sylvania, Ohio
 
BobHartung wrote:
In camer focus stacking produces a jpeg! If you don't use RAW that is no issue. You can also focus stack in LR and PS.


It does Jpeg and RAW - all my tests were with RAW.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.