I encourage you to follow burkphoto, which is what I do. Macro lens, bellows with slide holder, Mirrorless camera using Sensor Shift creating.
Now let me add. I hope never to migrate all my images from film/print to digital. I thought at one time it was the thing to do. But I have worked as a computer consultant for 30+ years and a hobby photographer since the 60's, to current.
I concluded that migrating from film to digital was the worst future for my images. I do ONLY drum scans for those images I have a better purpose for, like printing or selling in digital form.
NO SCAN is ever as good as, let alone better than, the original it came from (without post processing). With that in mind, why do you want to digitize all your original images????????????
The migration of film/prints starts you down a path of constant deterioration of any images converted. This is because of the fact that the first conversion is a serious degrade of all images. Next, you are constantly faced with image degrading as technology evolves requiring future migrations to new media. No conversion is ever as good as the original, be it film or digital.
Most people cannot really give a good answer for the reason to digitize.
Recapture storage space. Is the space you are now using necessary to recapture.
Improve the images. No, simply not going to happen, unless you want to do post processing. (Then why do them all)
Spend huge blocks of time foregoing photography for scanning to lesser quality, or setting up to capture with a digital camera.
Begin a routine of ongoing migration, which I love to do .... BS!!!!
Easier to find as digital, than the now archaic archival storage routine now used. (Another big BS here) Digital images are far harder to find singly unless you spend countless time on the design of the method of storage.
Better backup procedures. Let's change another kind of shit here. Horseshit. Unless setting up a triple redundant storage and backup system, digital equipment failure and file loss will supercede your current archive in losing images.
Sorry, but I know computer systems and fail points for digital very well, having made a nice steady income for 30 years dealing with such configuration and fail points.
I submit that you will never devise a more reliable system than the original archive you have now. Are you going to throw away the originals you now have in your possession......
I thought not~ the just convert the files using drum scan as you have a legitimate purpose to have one or more in digital format. You've heard the term lossey format for compression of digital files. Well, in my estimation, digitizing your files is the ULTIMATE LOSSY process, slowly and time consumingly doing the conversion and then faced with future migrations as media changes for storing the files you once had safely stored and recoverable by some familiar method to you.
I consider my best storage of old film is to protect against cataclysmic event like fire or flood. A problem you still have with digital.
I have made a good income with digital and computers, but that is because they are the least reliable devices known to man, and I make my money from that gross failure on humanities part. And yes, eventually they will rule over mankind in our haste to accomodate them and the human engineers who foist them upon us.
I also went through a period of mental masturbation about converting ALL my film work. I bought and was frustrated with about 4 Epson scanners including a 750, then a Nikon SuperCoolScan 5000 dedicated 35mm scanner, and then a Canon and a Minolta. Drum scans proved to be the only good result but too costly and still not as good as the original image. So I have attempted to do the work and disappointed in results, but even more frustrated with the time consumed.