Which one do you prefer and why?
I like #2. It is slightly brighter and the driveway looks much more attractive.
I would go with #2 as the exposure is better for the details.
#1 is good but needs to increase the exposure about 1/2 stop. However the roof on the garage has a little too much detail or black. If this is a RAW file perhaps backing off on the black would correct that.
While I was at it I would remove the toys from the lawn.
IMHO
Bob
Different or enhanced clouds. Dark spots (wet) on roof.
Both were shot with Sony a6000 at f:8 ISO 100 but different Lenses (Sony E 1.8/50 OSS and MC Гелиос 81H 2/50). What would be your guess?
to me # 1 is clearer, has more detail. I'd guess that was the better lens. That is about the best answer, not which is the more expensive one.
#1 is sharper. The exposure difference is too insignificant to mention.
rlv567
Loc: Baguio City, Philippines
The Sony lens is a little bit sharper - and the other has slight CA.
All of those toys in the yard are very distracting to me. Nevertheless, I like #2.
Not a very discenable difference ... but I vote for #2
# 2 you fixed the roof and made it cleaner
This post about comparing 2 lenses, not about postprocessing. Thanks for your replies and comments.
Hal81
Loc: Bucks County, Pa.
The first one is clear. The second still has a large mortgage.
I prefer #2; the first one is too dark.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.