Clattering cameras (Page 4): Roger, over...

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

dhultsman wrote:

Uh, surely, maybe?

Roger, over

Tommy II Loc: Northern Illinois

👍

Hyperhad Loc: Thunder Bay, Canada

DaveO wrote:

We're not sure and don't call me Shirley. Or is don't call me, Shirley?

Rats...you beat me to that one! BTW, did you know that Leslie Neilson has a brother who is a Senator in Canadian Parliament?🇨🇦

Novicus Loc: north and east

burkphoto wrote:

Political press conferences *really are* full of p... (show quote)

Here`s the Valid Explanation !!

Spirit Vision Photography Loc: Behind a Camera.

David in Dallas wrote:

I was watching the coverage of President Trump in Florida today and almost could not hear what was being said over the incessant loud clattering of the cameras. One would think that since almost all cameras in use today are digital, it would be possible to create an electronic shutter that was noiseless.

Iâve never noticed any shutter noise or mirror slap in my rig. ð¤

(Download)

chasgroh Loc: Buena Park, CA

...makes me wonder, if with some attention to the *sound* part of the event, most of that clatter could be eliminated?

drklrd Loc: Cincinnati Ohio

pretty much it has been done but then you have the no mirror cameras. The flap you hear is that mirror slapping up and then down. the new ones aren't as accepted yet but are just beginning to come into their own with interchangeable lenses ebcoming available ..til then the mirror slap gets louder as the camera ages.... i turn the bells and whistles off on mine but my nikon still slaps that mirror unless you put it in video mode set up for stills which changes your settings to video mode settings.

DanCulleton

Rather hear cameras than hear Trump!

GreenDruid Loc: Toronto, Canada

Because autofocus is much slower in that setup...

leftj Loc: Texas

David in Dallas wrote:

I was watching the coverage of President Trump in Florida today and almost could not hear what was being said over the incessant loud clattering of the cameras. One would think that since almost all cameras in use today are digital, it would be possible to create an electronic shutter that was noiseless.

I think most mirrorless have an electronic noiseless shutter option. I know fuji does.

leftj Loc: Texas

DanCulleton wrote:

Rather hear cameras than hear Trump!

Typical head in the sand liberal statement.

wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado

David in Dallas wrote:

I was watching the coverage of President Trump in Florida today and almost could not hear what was being said over the incessant loud clattering of the cameras. One would think that since almost all cameras in use today are digital, it would be possible to create an electronic shutter that was noiseless.

Most of those cameras have mirrors and will always make that "incessant loud clattering". Until the press write off those extremely expensive cameras mirrored cameras and go to mirrorless, we will always hear that "incessant loud clattering".

cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast

"Don't call me Shirley"

burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC

wdross wrote:

Most of those cameras have mirrors and will always make that "incessant loud clattering". Until the press write off those extremely expensive cameras mirrored cameras and go to mirrorless, we will always hear that "incessant loud clattering".

Or until the White House bans dSLRs...

PhotonHog Loc: Annapolis

I kind of like that noise - or better, sound. The more clatter the more important the news. Also the sound of the motor drives (still use 'em) adds to the effect. Yes it must be the mirror flipping that is the main source. I had a real nice Canon QL-17 many years ago with a leaf shutter that was VERY quiet. I miss that little rangefinder.