I am am eclectic phtographer. I like nature, animals and doll photography and travel when I am able. I love to experiment and when I fail, I let people know so that they can learn from my mistakes. I also do not take myself to seriously. I enjoy what I do and I try to make the images work.
I am told I do, but I am not conscious of it.
With out question UHH's Snap-Shot, Bill, and his treated [post processed] flowers is a style. All are the same, but different, as would his same treatment style applied to crowds on a street corner; different faces, same post. He has a 1001 images all beautiful. Enough for a one-man-show... with out question as with a great Sitcom or a Perry Maison classic... we know the characters, we know the out come, but each episode is the same format. Snap Shot has applied this approach to visual writing well.
There was a watercolor artist in Orlando area who painted the same characters over and over doing differing things.... key was she used vodka as the water agent causing the water colors to flow differently on the media. This made her work distinguishably from other artists. The paintings sold hi $ and well.
Dirtpusher, this edition of UHH, gave reference to a photographer who photographed the same window for 12 years !!
https://petapixel.com/2018/02/08/photographer-spent-12-years-shooting-window/
Feiertag wrote:
I just finished reading an article on this subject. Have you come up with your own style? What sets you apart from most photographers?
Very, very few photographers have their own style. If they do, it must be extremely limiting. I can recognize musicians and artists by their work, but not photographers.
I think the idea of developing your own style means shooting what you want and developing ways to shoot that are good for you. Having a black dog in every image is not what I would call a style, but it would certainly set a photographer off from the herd.
I believe one’s “photography style” is not represented only by an end product, but includes the way they arrive at the end product. This could inciude set up time, # of images taken, amount of post processing done, etc.
Wow! Wish I hadn't looked at that
...now I'm jealous😊
I guess my style could best be described as "hit or miss".
My style I call "Serendipity" - something attracts me and I shoot it. Used to be we'd drive along looking out at the forest and any dead tree would remind us of firewood (for wood furnace). Now I seem to have developed photographic ADHD. Every little thing is a possible photo subject.
I would say my style is evolving. I primarily shoot sports. I have a 13 yr old granddaughter who wants to shoot - she's very artistic and has a natural eye - just the opposite of my skills. I like to shoot almost everything except portraits. So it's an education for me to hang out with her with our cameras. I learn a lot from her about seeing things in a new way and she learns from me the technical aspects of photography - camera setup & post processing.
Feiertag wrote:
I just finished reading an article on this subject. Have you come up with your own style? What sets you apart from most photographers?
Casual would be a description. Do not have a great interest in other photographers.
traderjohn wrote:
Casual would be a description. Do not have a great interest in other photographers.
Are we confusing style with our individual, unique vision?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.