ShooterRod wrote:
I was alway envious of the Hasselblad folks....saw their ultra sharp photos and enlargements..envious!
I bought a Kowa 66...way less expensive, but reviews said the optics were excellent.
Thought it would be a burden to carry around, but surprisingly, that size camera is so close to the SLR 35s that
I never felt burdened. Took some nice photos...because it seemed like a special camera to me, I seemed to be
a better photographer with it. The logical progression would be a Hasselblad instead of the large Canon DSLR I
have now....but I've been unable to pull the $$ trigger. I think the same thing has happened to the folks on this
site...I never see words about medium format challenges/problems/triumphs. Is it because of cost..hard to
believe because many of you have released a list of your lenses in present ownership...and you have lots of $$$ involved..
Is it because of the idea that that format is just too large to handle? Is it because of the lack of innumerable
control features that the DSLRs have? Is it because this site devoted to 35mm? Someone needs to post some
nice medium format photos....maybe even comparisons of the same scenes...I for one would love to see
if there is still a difference...and how much the difference is...Thanks...
I was alway envious of the Hasselblad folks....saw... (
show quote)
This site is not dedicated to any one particular format. There are people here using 4x5 (and larger) sheet film, 120 roll film, 35mm film, smartphones, full frame (24x36mm) dSLR and DSLM, APS-C dSLR and DSLM, Micro 4/3 mirrorless, 1", and other bridge camera sensor formats.
I own a Bronica ETRSi with several backs, a 75mm, a 150mm, and other accessories, but I haven't used it since the late 1990s. I also have a couple of Nikons, a Canon, and a Minolta in the closet.
Digital cameras are simply too good. I quit using film in 2005, after helping to transition the lab I worked in from using film/optical processes to using digital processes. By then, I knew what I needed to get what I wanted from digital gear.
While medium format DIGITAL gear is available, it is priced in the stratosphere. It is primarily the province of professional photo illustrators serving advertisers, and a few well-heeled landscape photographers. No one truly needs it unless they regularly print larger than 40x30 inches for applications that will be viewed at awkwardly close range.
Film is still viable for those who want to use it. However, for my needs, I use (and require) a fully digital workflow. I do hybrid work (stills, plus video, plus audio narration, plus graphics, plus text, plus music, all on Intranets, DVDs, and Internet web sites), so I use a Lumix GH4. It records stills and videos equally well with one body. I can help my twins make a film short, or do a training video with print manual and PDF or eLearning module. The versatility is amazing.
I'm sure you'll find some folks here with Yashicas, Mamiyas, Rolleis, Bronicas, 'blads, and even a Kowa Six or some weird Russian roll film camera. There's been enough demand for film manufacturers to keep making many of the old standards, although transparency films have a limited market representation. B&H and Adorama and Freestyle are still selling a nice range of emulsions. The used camera market has plenty of used bargains, so finding an old favorite is pretty easy.