pro-life or is it pro birth; Cowardly Americans Tremble In Fear While A Courageous Nun Defends Women (Page 7): So..... A high school girl, fifteen years old, has the misfortune to be...

GeorgeH Loc: Jonesboro, GA

jfn007 wrote:

The bitch should be responsible for paying for her abortion. With this no morals society she knows some poor taxpayer will pay for he being a two-hole slut. Let her learn to like anal sex just like the ass bandits do.

So..... A high school girl, fifteen years old, has the misfortune to be drugged and raped at a party, and becomes pregnant. Is she then responsible for her unwanted pregnancy?

Sirrah, do you have a daughter? If some poor girl or young woman is so unfortunate to be your child, would you force her to carry to term and deliver the result of a rape? I await your answer, you misogynist. (For your information, a misogynist is one who hates women, as you seem to.)

GeorgeH Loc: Jonesboro, GA

I wonder how many WOMEN have participated in this thread? And for those who did, were your opinions accorded a respectful hearing?

We males certainly have the right to a voice, but the WOMEN who are dealing with the results of rape and other assaults on their bodies have, IMHO, the last word on whether or not to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term. Okay, fellow swinging dicks, what's the word? And please no comments on "closing their legs," or other inane comments.

Hmm... So far the silence is deafening....

GeorgeH Loc: Jonesboro, GA

jfn007 wrote:

Why the hell should taxpayers pay for an abortion for some irresponsible broad who gets knocked up? Same old "war on women" mantra from the left. All she has to do is keep her knees together.

Well. Your avatar claims that your are former Special Forces. I suppose that you are (or were!) pretty buff and physically fit. Since men are typically larger and stronger than women, how many women could "keep their [sic] legs together" when assaulted by a Special Forces warrior. I'm not saying that YOU would assault a woman, but consider the likely disparity between the typical woman and the typical "man" who might assault her. Hardly a fair match, wouldn't you agree? So...just perhaps it's unfair to blame a woman or girl from not keeping her knees together?

I await your thoughts on this matter....

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Racmanaz wrote:

So you rather murder the child than to have them live just because of the false impression you give about the child not being cared for?

Rac, that was out of line, but you know I won't argue with you about your religious beliefs and we both know that is where this comes from.

Bangee5 Loc: Louisiana

GeorgeH wrote:

So..... A high school girl, fifteen years old, has the misfortune to be drugged and raped at a party, and becomes pregnant. Is she then responsible for her unwanted pregnancy?

Sirrah, do you have a daughter? If some poor girl or young woman is so unfortunate to be your child, would you force her to carry to term and deliver the result of a rape? I await your answer, you misogynist. (For your information, a misogynist is one who hates women, as you seem to.)

---- Dead.... topic!

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

dirtpusher wrote:

What they do. Is between them an thier maker

Does that apply to everything. Obama did not vote against the murder of breathing live infants as a result of a "live birth abortion". He was the only one to not vote against it. Those women killed their alive babys. Is that between them and their maker? I do not believe that. I think it should be between them and a jury.

SteveR Loc: Michigan

Keep 'em poor, keep 'em dumb, and keep 'em on welfare....the Dumbocrats.

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

boberic wrote:

Does that apply to everything. Obama did not vote against the murder of breathing live infants as a result of a "live birth abortion". He was the only one to not vote against it. Those women killed their alive babys. Is that between them and their maker? I do not believe that. I think it should be between them and a jury.

Let you resolve that.

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

SteveR wrote:

Keep 'em poor, keep 'em dumb, and keep 'em on welfare....the Dumbocrats.

Repukes doing good job that.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Bangee5 wrote:

Pro -birth? Are you stupid! Pro birth means giving birth. Same as pro life. PRO means 'for', you are for birth.

Are you that stupid!

Once they're born you don't give a shit about them. You just want to punish what you consider "loose women".

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Bangee5 wrote:

So your answer to this is to abstain from sex or get an abortion.

I'm way in favor of birth control. Many on your side of the aisle are way anti birth control as well.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

boberic wrote:

Does that apply to everything. Obama did not vote against the murder of breathing live infants as a result of a "live birth abortion". He was the only one to not vote against it. Those women killed their alive babys. Is that between them and their maker? I do not believe that. I think it should be between them and a jury.

Your point is that most aborted fetuses were not alive?

SteveR Loc: Michigan

dirtpusher wrote:

Repukes doing good job that.

The Republican approach is to provide jobs and get people off welfare. The tax plan and the infrastructure initiative should help in doing just that.

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

SteveR wrote:

The Republican approach is to provide jobs and get people off welfare. The tax plan and the infrastructure initiative should help in doing just that.

They have blocked so many jobs not even funny. Step back an look.

SharpShooter Loc: NorCal

venturer9 wrote:

IF I told you that I do, you would call me a liar so I won't tell you...

OH WELL.. why not.. Yes I do... and even more, I call her to the computer and say "Look honey what that ass FrankT said this time" She says.. Why do you read that crap? I say... aw..its fun...

Mike

LIAR!!!

SS