Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Canon 80 D ,Very high ISO and very low shutter speeds..no Canon repair help
Page <<first <prev 3 of 14 next> last>>
Dec 31, 2017 05:56:59   #
scotty54 Loc: Cranberry Twp, PA
 
It does not seem responders have read the question, OP stated that setting higher shutter speed was ignored by camera. Answers I saw recommended higher shutter speed, better gear, etc. Wish I could help, maybe someone will read more thoroughly and have an answer. Good luck with your camera!

Reply
Dec 31, 2017 06:05:04   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
Apaflo wrote:
The OP gave us all the information needed to calculate how much light there was, and we can see the poor quality of others that have been posted.

"I do a lot of shooting in these situations - indoor night sports, indoor weddings (in well lighted venues), and bluegrass bands indoors without special stage lighting, and my usual exposures are as described above - shutter speeds 1/200 - 1/250, f 2 or f2.8 and ISOs that vary from 6,400-12,800."

Your level of experience was obvious from your comments too!

I don't shoot much of this today, but for several years it was a large part of my professional work. I went from a D2x, to a D3, then a D3s to a D4. Currently I have a D5. All of these were purchased to allow shooting at high ISO values in low light while getting high quality images that print at least at 16x20.

"At a minimum, the OP will need a faster lens and a higher shutter speed (and shooting raw with good PP)"

The 80D will never make the grade, and neither will any other cropped sensor.

But frankly there are always those who have no technical understanding and no experience but will loudly proclaim the equipment they own is good enough. They demonstrate very clearly that it is not true too.
The OP gave us all the information needed to calcu... (show quote)


Only 1 of your snapshots were at f2.8 and that was at iso 4500. Are you confused? What ever happened to your 5Cs?

Reply
Dec 31, 2017 06:21:06   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
ikodimer wrote:
School auditorium and granddaughter's choir at distance to camera 50-150 feet ( estimate) with no flash allowed, low overhead incandescent lighting, no tripod allowed, auto focus ON, center point metering, large file size. Hand held, Tried ISOs in 4000 to 6400 ranges, bracketing shots at wide open
f stops using 2 different lenses....a Canon 17-85 mm, set @ f 4.0 and Tamron 18-270 mm lens ,set @ f 3.5. Got extremely low shutter speeds in ranges from 0.6 sec maybe up to 1/ 6-1/8 seconds. Unacceptable, fuzzy images on both lenses..so doubt is a lens problem.
Tried Menu # 2 to manually increase shutter speeds to at least 1/30-1/60 seconds using same settings stipulated above. When image taken, it didn't respond to manual adjustment of shutter speeds upwards to faster speeds but merely reverted to original very low speeds. Canon Repair had no answer..did clean camera and updated my firmware to latest. Come on "Hoggers" : any cogent inputs would help so I can talk to Canon again or guide me instead thru this problem..Could this be a camera to lens communication problem ?? Thanks for your help.
School auditorium and granddaughter's choir at dis... (show quote)


Most modern Canon camera's can shoot at a high ISO. My Nikon D500 can go up without pushing to 25000, I also have a 70-200 2.8 which would do well in low light. All Nikon's seem to do well there in low light. I am sure Canon makes the equivalent camera.

Reply
 
 
Dec 31, 2017 06:49:00   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
ikodimer wrote:
School auditorium and granddaughter's choir at distance to camera 50-150 feet ( estimate) with no flash allowed, low overhead incandescent lighting, no tripod allowed, auto focus ON, center point metering, large file size. Hand held, Tried ISOs in 4000 to 6400 ranges, bracketing shots at wide open
f stops using 2 different lenses....a Canon 17-85 mm, set @ f 4.0 and Tamron 18-270 mm lens ,set @ f 3.5. Got extremely low shutter speeds in ranges from 0.6 sec maybe up to 1/ 6-1/8 seconds. Unacceptable, fuzzy images on both lenses..so doubt is a lens problem.
Tried Menu # 2 to manually increase shutter speeds to at least 1/30-1/60 seconds using same settings stipulated above. When image taken, it didn't respond to manual adjustment of shutter speeds upwards to faster speeds but merely reverted to original very low speeds. Canon Repair had no answer..did clean camera and updated my firmware to latest. Come on "Hoggers" : any cogent inputs would help so I can talk to Canon again or guide me instead thru this problem..Could this be a camera to lens communication problem ?? Thanks for your help.
School auditorium and granddaughter's choir at dis... (show quote)


Sounds like slow lenses are causing the problem.
We don't know the actual lighting levels as the description is a subjective comment as to what low is but from the way it sounds it was LOW.
Was the choir lit with stage lighting at all? Or was there no auditorium stage lighting? Generally that type of lighting on a choir is sufficient to allow for higher shutter speeds even with slower lenses.
Bottom line it sounds like just really too low light for the lenses not the equipment failing.

Reply
Dec 31, 2017 07:17:07   #
Clapperboard
 
chaman: "A crop sensor can indeed get good images in low light if the equipment is used well and its limitations are known, not a particularly fast lens either. Ive shown these before:"

chaman, You're a brave man. I have lots of friends and clients that have trouble accepting what can be produced from a crop sensor. But suggesting anything of that nature here just brings on the 'how dumb are you not to realise you must have a full frame camera'!!!
Of course you get the 'show us some images to compare' response. Sadly showing images on a low res display will not show the true comparison.
Your work. and comments shows an understanding of digital photography.
Good luck and thank you.

Reply
Dec 31, 2017 07:17:44   #
Apaflo Loc: Anchorage, Alaska
 
billnikon wrote:
Most modern Canon camera's can shoot at a high ISO. My Nikon D500 can go up without pushing to 25000, I also have a 70-200 2.8 which would do well in low light. All Nikon's seem to do well there in low light. I am sure Canon makes the equivalent camera.

Canon makes nothing with a cropped sensor that is anything near the Nikon D500. But even then, the D500 does not approach a full frame sensor in low light.

The D500 hits 6.5 fstops of useful dynamic range at ISO 2557. Compare that to the D750 at ISO 4075. The D750 is just less than 1 full fstop better than the D500.

And while you can set a D500 to ISO 25000 the image will have a maximum useful dynamic range of only 3.25 fstops. That is more than 2 fstops into the noise!

The significance is that 6.5 fstops of useful dynamic range is the minimum needed to get essentially noise free images. Even at that there is absolutely no leeway for exposure error or any kind of tone mapping. For reasonable post processing about 8 fstops of range is desired. For a D500 that means shooting at no greater than ISO 800.

Don't expect to get high quality images in poorly illuminated gymnasiums!

Reply
Dec 31, 2017 07:30:05   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
Apaflo wrote:
Canon makes nothing with a cropped sensor that is anything near the Nikon D500. But even then, the D500 does not approach a full frame sensor in low light.

The D500 hits 6.5 fstops of useful dynamic range at ISO 2557. Compare that to the D750 at ISO 4075. The D750 is just less than 1 full fstop better than the D500.

And while you can set a D500 to ISO 25000 the image will have a maximum useful dynamic range of only 3.25 fstops. That is more than 2 fstops into the noise!

The significance is that 6.5 fstops of useful dynamic range is the minimum needed to get essentially noise free images. Even at that there is absolutely no leeway for exposure error or any kind of tone mapping. For reasonable post processing about 8 fstops of range is desired. For a D500 that means shooting at no greater than ISO 800.

Don't expect to get high quality images in poorly illuminated gymnasiums!
Canon makes nothing with a cropped sensor that is ... (show quote)


I believe they said auditorium.

Reply
 
 
Dec 31, 2017 07:36:09   #
Apaflo Loc: Anchorage, Alaska
 
Architect1776 wrote:
I believe they said auditorium.

Don't expect good results in poorly illuminated auditoriums.

Poor lighting is poor lighting.

Reply
Dec 31, 2017 07:46:58   #
sb Loc: Florida's East Coast
 
Apaflo wrote:
With that camera and those lenses it can't be done under the circumstances described.

At least a 6D body and lens with a maximum aperture of f/2.8 is required. And even with that it would need very good technique and post processing.


And with a 6D you can push it to ISO 25,800 and still get acceptable photos. I think the OP was just expecting too much performance from his equipment in a very low-light situation. He also needs to learn a lot more about using his equipment - like what shutter speeds he should attempt while hand-holding a camera!

Reply
Dec 31, 2017 08:00:32   #
Apaflo Loc: Anchorage, Alaska
 
sb wrote:
And with a 6D you can push it to ISO 25,800 and still get acceptable photos. ...

Can't say I agree with that. The highest reasonable ISO for a Canon 6D is about 4070, where a perfectly nailed exposure gets 6.5 fstops of useful dymamic range. At ISO 25,600 the 6D only gets about 4 fstops of useful dynamic range which puts everything about 2.5 fstops into the noise. Not good!

Just because you can set it to shoot at ISO 25,600 does not mean the images are useful. They can be down sized to 1200 pixels wide for use on the Internet, but even an 8x10 print will be less than suitable in most cases.

Reply
Dec 31, 2017 08:06:33   #
tomcat
 
Apaflo wrote:
Yes it works great for a very small low quality print.

Here are several images that have been printed at 16x20 or larger with exceptionally high quality. All are at ISO values high enough, and light low enough, that no cropped sensor camera can manage it.

http://apaflo.com/gallery3/d3s_0062.s.jpg.html

http://apaflo.com/gallery2/d3f_8631.jpg.html

http://apaflo.com/gallery3/d3s_9170.s.jpg.html

http://apaflo.com/gallery4/d8a_5652.s.jpg.html

http://apaflo.com/gallery3/d3s_0267.s.jpg.html
Yes it works great for a very small low quality pr... (show quote)




Dude, sorry to burst your bubble, but these are not "exceptionally high quality" images as you proclaim. They are definitely acceptable, compared to an iPhone, but just not as good as a D3s is capable of doing. I suspect that lens was your problem, the Tamron at f/3.5. I have a similar problem as the OP with low light in a gym, trying to get pictures of volleyball and the only success I had was with an f/1.4 lens. So to the OP, you have to get a faster lens and go to a higher ISO and live with your results because it's the best it's going to get with a crop sensor. Nikon's D5 and the D3s can do this, but you will have to upgrade your body. I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but you just cannot manufacture light without a flash and the light that you have is not good enough to get a really great image. So see if you can rent a faster lens to try out and if it works, look for a refurb

Reply
 
 
Dec 31, 2017 08:10:29   #
Clapperboard
 
scotty54 said: "It does not seem responders have read the question, OP stated that setting higher shutter speed was ignored by camera. Answers I saw recommended higher shutter speed, better gear, etc. Wish I could help, maybe someone will read more thoroughly and have an answer. Good luck with your camera!"

scotty54 you are so right!
I have no experience of the Canon 80D hence I don't know about menu 2 as referred to by the OP. I am guessing however that there is nothing wrong with the camera. Which IS what the OP was asking. My suggestion is that menu setting included some automatic camera controlled aspects of operation. Thus setting the faster shutter speeds was over ruled by the camera as it would not give an exposure the camera was programmed to accept.
Put the camera in full manual and play with it from there to check it out. When shooting in similar conditions in future you may choose to use full manual, or another automatic mode with some manual control. Let's look into that later. For now set FULLY to manual and adjust settings to see the camera works.

Reply
Dec 31, 2017 08:12:42   #
tomcat
 
scotty54 wrote:
It does not seem responders have read the question, OP stated that setting higher shutter speed was ignored by camera. Answers I saw recommended higher shutter speed, better gear, etc. Wish I could help, maybe someone will read more thoroughly and have an answer. Good luck with your camera!


I did read what he said about the camera not selecting a high shutter speed and I'm not familiar with Canyon cameras. I would tell the OP to shoot in 100% manual, where he is adjusting both the aperture to its' wide open number and then adjust the shutter speed to no less than 1/500. Then crank the ISO up until the meter zeros out and go from there. Also to set the camera meter to spot metering, not averaging. That's the best he is going to get until he gets at least a 1.8 or 1.4 lens

Reply
Dec 31, 2017 08:19:52   #
Apaflo Loc: Anchorage, Alaska
 
tomcat wrote:
Dude, sorry to burst your bubble, but these are not "exceptionally high quality" images as you proclaim. ...

Sorry that you are not observant enough to realize you were looking at a downsized image intended to be viewable on the Internet from my website without being large enough for anyone to print at a commercial quality. It would be really stupid to put a higher quality on the Internet.

As I stated the images were all printed at 16x20 or larger, and yes they are very high quality prints.

Reply
Dec 31, 2017 08:39:27   #
par4fore Loc: Bay Shore N.Y.
 
ikodimer wrote:
School auditorium and granddaughter's choir at distance to camera 50-150 feet ( estimate) with no flash allowed, low overhead incandescent lighting, no tripod allowed, auto focus ON, center point metering, large file size. Hand held, Tried ISOs in 4000 to 6400 ranges, bracketing shots at wide open
f stops using 2 different lenses....a Canon 17-85 mm, set @ f 4.0 and Tamron 18-270 mm lens ,set @ f 3.5. Got extremely low shutter speeds in ranges from 0.6 sec maybe up to 1/ 6-1/8 seconds. Unacceptable, fuzzy images on both lenses..so doubt is a lens problem.
Tried Menu # 2 to manually increase shutter speeds to at least 1/30-1/60 seconds using same settings stipulated above. When image taken, it didn't respond to manual adjustment of shutter speeds upwards to faster speeds but merely reverted to original very low speeds. Canon Repair had no answer..did clean camera and updated my firmware to latest. Come on "Hoggers" : any cogent inputs would help so I can talk to Canon again or guide me instead thru this problem..Could this be a camera to lens communication problem ?? Thanks for your help.
School auditorium and granddaughter's choir at dis... (show quote)

Tamron 18-270 mm lens ,set @ f 3.5 is 6.3 at 270mm

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 14 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.