Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Farewell to my beloved D500...
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Dec 11, 2017 06:00:28   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
mikeroetex wrote:
Panasonic GH5 - 725 grams
D500 = 760 grams
Difference of 45 grams = 1.6 oz.
stick with the D500 and buy newer, lighter lens


Unless you want video capabilities...which is what the gh5 is mostly known for.

Em1ii is a better comparison to the D500 at 574 g

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 09:52:09   #
robinsonl2
 
Does anyone know where the nearest camera store is to Jacksonville Florida. We have the largest,land area,city in the U.S and no camera store. Thanks.

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 11:13:55   #
tomcat
 
robinsonl2 wrote:
Does anyone know where the nearest camera store is to Jacksonville Florida. We have the largest,land area,city in the U.S and no camera store. Thanks.


Sounds like a great business opportunity to me......

Reply
 
 
Dec 12, 2017 11:20:34   #
twillsol Loc: St. Louis, MO
 
BJW wrote:
Sadly, the time has come where I have to replace my dear D500, and I look to my friends and colleagues at UHH for guidance, and solace. Her weight, when coupled with my 70-200 f 2.8 has just gotten too heavy and too bulky for me to carry lately, especially to the high school ice hockey games that I shoot. I have no choice but to switch to lighter gear, if I am to continue my sports photography activities.

I suppose that would take me into the realm of mirrorless/MFT cameras. While I have done the research in terms of the specs of the various brands, I would appreciate input from those who have actually used MFT cameras (Sony, Olympus, Fujifilm, Lumix, etc.) in those situations where the D500 excels. In a word, I want smaller and lighter but of at least equal quality. The D500 has served me very well for indoor sports photography, in these areas: superb low light performance, a burst rate of at least 10fps, camera body ergonomics with ease of handling for fast moving action shots; great Auto Focus; and a rational and user-friendly menu system (or one that has a good a guide as Steve Perry's). Because I don't use a tripod or monopod for the type of sports photography I do, I recognize that much of the weight I'm complaining about is attributable to the long lens I use. So, I'd also be grateful for any suggestions as to comparable lenses for MFT bodies which are substantially lighter in weight. Fortunately, budgetary limitations need not be considered.

Many thanks,

BJW
Sadly, the time has come where I have to replace m... (show quote)


Have you considered a monopod with a nice ball head. That is what I use for my sports photos. Have to admit that I do not do ice hockey, but i do volleyball in very dim situations and soccer (which is of course outdoors). I have very good luck with my D500 and 70-200, 2.8 lens.

Will

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.