Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
New Tamron 18 - 400 3.5-6.3 Lens
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Nov 3, 2017 02:25:24   #
Motorbones Loc: Fair Oaks, CA
 
I have that lens on a D7500 and really like it. A bit bulky, but very lean for what it does...I'm very happy with the pics it takes...

Reply
Nov 8, 2017 20:27:09   #
byuaceman Loc: Mesa, AZ
 
I recently bought this lens for my Canon 70D and took these shots. I'm pleased with the results and plan on using it in Africa next year.





Reply
Nov 8, 2017 20:55:56   #
jim61 Loc: Chester,south dakota
 
byuaceman wrote:
I recently bought this lens for my Canon 70D and took these shots. I'm pleased with the results and plan on using it in Africa next year.


wow beautiful.i need practice.

Reply
 
 
Nov 8, 2017 21:54:22   #
Motorbones Loc: Fair Oaks, CA
 
Nice pics...

Reply
Dec 21, 2017 10:07:37   #
SparkyNYC Loc: NYC & Coconut Creek,Fl
 
Here some shots from two weeks ago.
I have tried to show different focal lengths.
I like it in bright light.
I have tried to capture some spiders,but it was too windy to get the web to stay still,for auto focus.
Also please check my previous posts:
"Crisp Light,New Lens-My Day at the Beach"
"Short walk in Manhattan with my new Tamron 18-400"
I do not know how to make a link on this site.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Dec 21, 2017 10:55:42   #
jccash Loc: Longwood, Florida
 
Very nice.

Reply
Feb 6, 2018 08:40:38   #
bobfitz Loc: Kendall-Miami, Florida
 
I shoot primarily with the Nikon D7100 which I really like a lot. I own the Tamron 90mm f2.8 Macro and love it. I just received shipping notice on my new Tamron 18-400 which should arrive in a few days. I have researched this lens and considered many, many opinions. For my money it looks like a real winner and I can't wait to shoot with it. I leave for Alaska on June 9th for two weeks and have to believe that this lens will be just what the doctor ordered. At 75 years old i will really enjoy shedding the extra weight of all the extra lenses I used to travel with. I may carry one spare lens just in case something unforeseen should happen to the 18-400. I would hate to travel from Miami to Alaska and be without a lens. I will post photos upon my return.

Reply
 
 
Feb 6, 2018 08:52:40   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
bobfitz wrote:
I shoot primarily with the Nikon D7100 which I really like a lot. I own the Tamron 90mm f2.8 Macro and love it. I just received shipping notice on my new Tamron 18-400 which should arrive in a few days. I have researched this lens and considered many, many opinions. For my money it looks like a real winner and I can't wait to shoot with it. I leave for Alaska on June 9th for two weeks and have to believe that this lens will be just what the doctor ordered. At 75 years old i will really enjoy shedding the extra weight of all the extra lenses I used to travel with. I may carry one spare lens just in case something unforeseen should happen to the 18-400. I would hate to travel from Miami to Alaska and be without a lens. I will post photos upon my return.
I shoot primarily with the Nikon D7100 which I rea... (show quote)



Reply
Mar 10, 2018 14:28:49   #
susankroupa Loc: Southwest Virginia
 
Hi, Bobfitz. We're going to be in Alaska about the same time--flying in June 4 and taking the inland waterway cruise starting the 9th. And I've been considering the Tamron 18-400 for the same reasons. I have the Nikkor 18-140 on my Nikon D5500, but if the IQ of the Tamron is as good, I'd rather have the longer range. I also have the wonderful nifty-fifty. I'm considering adding a Sony a6000 with a wide lens for landscapes.

Hope we both have a great time! :)

Reply
Mar 12, 2018 12:04:27   #
SparkyNYC Loc: NYC & Coconut Creek,Fl
 
I went to the Marlins preseason game vs the Yankees yesterday.
I was in the last row and last seat in the bleachers,with great lines of sight.
When I previewed the photos that I took,D5300 w/Tamron 18-400, I was a bit unhappy at the grainy photos that I saw.
Most were shot at 400mm.
I am my worst critic.
The lens is quite versatile,but at this long range I find not sharp.
I would not show these photos.
I like the lens very much ,as I have posted in various posts

Reply
Aug 25, 2018 16:12:33   #
schneiss Loc: Long Island NY
 
Going to Africa but refuse to schlep a big 600mm. Im considering replacing my Tamron 18-270 with their 18-400. Im told there is a significant improvement in sharpness and vibration control. Should I upgrade?

Reply
 
 
Aug 25, 2018 17:12:45   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
schneiss wrote:
Going to Africa but refuse to schlep a big 600mm. Im considering replacing my Tamron 18-270 with their 18-400. Im told there is a significant improvement in sharpness and vibration control. Should I upgrade?


One or the new 100-400's ( Tamron or Sigma) I would recommend over the 18-400 for serious work.

..

Reply
Aug 25, 2018 18:10:26   #
tims.ak Loc: Butte, Alaska
 
schneiss wrote:
Going to Africa but refuse to schlep a big 600mm. Im considering replacing my Tamron 18-270 with their 18-400. Im told there is a significant improvement in sharpness and vibration control. Should I upgrade?


It's definitely worth the upgrade. I travel with it every week but... Nothing like 600 mm though. I travel with my 150-600 when there's a chance for wildlife. The extra zoom makes a world of difference.

Reply
Sep 11, 2018 11:25:07   #
Fergus Loc: Westfield,IN
 
do you mean that the 18-400 isn't good toward the 18 area?

Reply
Sep 11, 2018 12:33:22   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Fergus wrote:
do you mean that the 18-400 isn't good toward the 18 area?


It is good and acceptable to many at all focal lengths, but not for everyone. That is a trade off for using a relatively inexpensive lens with a huge focal range, but at the same time it is a very good walk around lens if you don't care to carry and change additional lenses. Ours did a fine job with a couple thousand shots in Yellowstone for my wife. Going from flowers and landscapes and an occasional distant Grizzly or moose worked quite well. I lugged a FF and extra glass and it is a bit of a chore on long hikes. (I'll do it again, but that doesn't make me smart!) Some prefer to pursue glass that is sharper, so it's really about what suits your needs. 😊

There have been numerous posts on the forum with examples. I personally did not save any of my comparison shots.

We would buy it again. Have fun picking your poison!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.