rehess wrote:
I don’t see any responses to the facts I presented just a few posts ago...
Fact: smart phone focusing systems don’t handle motion well
***My iPhone 7 Plus has a stabilizer that works *very* well.
Fact: smart phones tend to be wide-angle only
***The iPhone 7 Plus, 8 Plus, and X have a second camera with normal lens (that they call telephoto)
Fact: smart phones provide little opportunity to over-ride exposure decisions
***All you have to do is download an advanced camera app for a few dollars and you can control everything manually! Camera + is one.
Fact: smart phones provide limited help when slow shutter speeds are essential
***If you have good technique, you can hand-hold a silhouette exposure in moonlight with a 6s Plus, 7 Plus, 8 Plus, or X. And you can purchase inexpensive tripod mounts for them. AND, you can hold a neutral density filter over the lens to reduce the shutter speed.
The real limitations are lack of control over actual depth of field, and difficulty using other lenses.
Smartphones DO NOT replace the role of an advanced camera for serious, intentional photography, for serious intentional photographers. I don't think anyone ever argues that point.
What smartphones do replace is the *casual* photographer's old 35mm SLR or point-and-shoot, most of the point-and-shoot digital cameras made since 2000, and the dSLR they never bothered to learn how to use. A total novice with a smartphone probably produces more interesting and useful photos than (s)he would with a dSLR, assuming (s)he has never read the dSLR manual, never taken a photography course, and has no patience to do so.