dennis2146 wrote:
With respect I think you are making a gross exaggeration by saying most photos are blurred. I and most people I know do not take blurred photos. I use aperture most of the time unless I want to somehow stop the action with a different shutter speed. DOF is everything to me and works for me for at least 90% of my shots. If I need to change the shutter speed for moving vehicles, boats or aircraft I will. If I want to slow down the shutter speed for waterfalls then I can. But for my shooting aperture works for me to control DOF.
Dennis
With respect I think you are making a gross exagge... (
show quote)
stuparr did not say most photos are blurred. He said that most photo fails are blurred. Don't know if I agree with that, but it is very different than most photos are blurred.
Bill_de wrote:
One reason I think many older folks use aperture priority is because it was the most common type of automation for SLRs, in the early years. Since the body controlled the shutter, there was no need to do anything to the lenses. Also, even when shutter priority came out you had to remove your finger from the shutter button to turn the shutter speed dial. Aperture was adjusted with the ring which was always in the grasp of your left hand. We learned it was easy to get the shutter speed we wanted by adjusting the aperture ring and watching the shutter speed indicator in the viewfinder.
Old habits die hard.
--
One reason I think many older folks use aperture p... (
show quote)
It would seem you are not giving older folks the credit they deserve for the experience they have. I am an older folk and know full well about aperture and shutter speed having used manual back in the early 60's when I got into photography. I know which one to choose for my photography needs and the reasons why.
Pointing out that older people used the shutter speed dial because it was easier than using the aperture ring is simply ridiculous. Maybe you did that but nobody I know was or is that lame to do that. Please sir, get a grip. No offense but I can't believe what I am reading; good grief.
Dennis
dsmeltz wrote:
stuparr did not say most photos are blurred. He said that most photo fails are blurred. Don't know if I agree with that, but it is very different than most photos are blurred.
This is what I read: As the largest Killer of most images we take is “blurred” photos and not lack of DOF, why use Av most or all of the time?
Sorry but it SEEMS that he is saying what I thought he said. Not worth arguing about no matter how we read the words.
Dennis
When notice my "P" mode chooses something ridiculous like 1/4000 at 5.6 for a landscape or flower, I go to "Aperture priority for added DOF and sharpness
From what I have heard and read about lenses is that they become much clearer throughout the focal when stepped down a stop or 3...
I cut my photography teeth on a Yashica 35mm SLR wIth Aperature Priority, so it’s comfortable. I want to use the best aperture for my subjects and if I can I try to use my lens’ best aperature setting. If the light changes rapidly, I’ll use Auto ISO.
dennis2146 wrote:
This is what I read: As the largest Killer of most images we take is “blurred” photos and not lack of DOF, why use Av most or all of the time?
Sorry but it SEEMS that he is saying what I thought he said. Not worth arguing about no matter how we read the words.
Dennis
Images that are "killed" Not most photos. It is a subset.
Leitz wrote:
Those who think for themselves don't fuss over what method others use.
What a great response! Not!!!!
dsmeltz wrote:
Images that are "killed" Not most photos. It is a subset.
Whatever and how you want to reword things. Not worth arguing about to me. You can if you choose.
Dennis
In aperture priority I'm more concerned about shutter speed then DOF while maintaining the lowest ISO that I can. That approach depends on the camera. In my full frame camera DOF is more critical while maintaining the lowest ISO possible is less critical. However, I still like "A" since I can control DOF with it while keeping one eye on the shutter speed, of course.
stuparr935 wrote:
I shoot mostly in manual mode, occasionally in shutter speed mode, but would only use aperture priority when doing desktop shots or close-ups. As the largest Killer of most images we take is “blurred” photos and not lack of DOF, why use Av most or all of the time? Shutter speed priority keeps your speed from getting into the “blurred” area without knowing it when shooting other than Landscapes. At medium and long distances, usually your DOF is not an issue. I travel internationally 3 or 4 times a year for enjoyment and take tons of photos and can’t think of any time I need to control my shoots with an Av mode setting. Hope someone can enlighten me. Thanks in advance...
I shoot mostly in manual mode, occasionally in shu... (
show quote)
I shoot Av most of the time because when the light keeps changing, all you need to do it open up and shoot. Once in a while the shutter speed drops down to a speed too slow and you get blurry pics, but if that happens I just increase the ISO. If shooting Tv I have always had more underexposed pictures than I know what to do with. This is because when the light drops the camera opens up as far as it can and when it reaches wide open and can't open any more you start getting underexposed image. With Av, it's the other way around. You open up with low light and when the light drops even lower the most that will happen is the shutter will really get slow. I can usually hear it get slow and simply up the ISO. I usually know when it's going to happen because of experience and up the ISO before this happens.
rehess wrote:
I'm not sure how to define "good sports photos"; I do know that I noticed deep DoF on "Final Four" pictures posted at MSNBC.
I think some of the best sports photos around are the action shots in Sports Illustrated. They occasionally have shots of the entire venue which requires a larger DOF but that is a different subject.
CamB
Loc: Juneau, Alaska
This is certainly an obnoxious reply. If you have nothing to add to this discussion except a snide comment, why are you here?
Leitz wrote:
Those who think for themselves don't fuss over what method others use.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.