Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Obama's second Term
Page <<first <prev 4 of 18 next> last>>
Jul 9, 2012 12:02:17   #
CocoaRoger Loc: Cocoa Florida
 
Read this and really ask yourself if you want Republicans running this country anymore. Ask yourself, what have they done for me (other than make me afraid of Democrats)????







Reply
Jul 9, 2012 12:03:37   #
DennisK Loc: Pickle City,Illinois
 
PNagy wrote:
Rachel wrote:
PNagy, you are a true Patriot.

I'm thankful for you sharing another point of view, and educating others so hopfully they understand that there is always another perspective.

You are my Hero for the day!!! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:



Thanks. That is an awesome compliment. At least my perspective is not partisan politics.


For being non partisan,you sure defend obummer a lot.

Reply
Jul 9, 2012 12:10:28   #
RixPix Loc: Miami, Florida
 
donrent wrote:
&#65533;

Interesting read.

But it all makes sense &#65533; the steps are in place to totally take over this country&#65533; Note that this was written over a month before Obama's illegal Executive Order providing amnesty for over 800,000 illegal immigrants, a good example of what McCann predicted Obama will continue to do if re-elected... A frightening prospect.

By Steve McCann
May 8, 2012 American Thinker

The 2012 election has often been described as the most pivotal since 1860.&#65533; This statement is not hyperbole.&#65533;&#65533; If Barack Obama is re-elected the United States will never be the same, nor will it be able to re-capture its once lofty status as the most dominant nation in the history of mankind.

The overwhelming majority of Americans do not understand that Obama's first term was dedicated to putting in place executive power to enable him and the administration to fulfill the campaign promise of "transforming America" in his second term regardless of which political party controls Congress.&#65533; That is why his re-election team is virtually ignoring the plight of incumbent or prospective Democratic Party office holders.

The most significant accomplishment of Obama's first term is to make Congress irrelevant.&#65533;&#65533; Under the myopic and blindly loyal leadership of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, the Democrats have succeeded in creating an imperial and, in a second term, a potential dictatorial presidency.

During the first two years of the Obama administration when the Democrats overwhelming controlled both Houses of Congress and the media was in an Obama worshiping stupor, a myriad of laws were passed and actions taken which transferred virtually unlimited power to the executive branch.

The birth of multi-thousand page laws was not an aberration. This tactic was adopted so the bureaucracy controlled by Obama appointees would have sole discretion in interpreting vaguely written laws and enforcing thousands of pages of regulations they and not Congress would subsequently write.

For example, in the 2,700 pages of ObamaCare there are more than 2,500 references to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. There are more than 700 instances when he or she is instructed that they "shall" do something and more than 200 times when they "may" take at their sole discretion some form of regulatory action. On 139 occasions, the law mentions that the "Secretary determines."&#65533; In essence one person, appointed by and reporting to the president, will be in charge of the health care of 310 million Americans once ObamaCare is fully operational in 2014.

The same is true in the 2,319 pages of the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Act which confers nearly unlimited power on various agencies to control by fiat the nation's financial, banking and investment sectors.&#65533; The bill also creates new agencies, such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, not subject to any oversight by Congress.&#65533; This overall process was repeated numerous times with other legislation all with the intent of granting unfettered power to the executive branch controlled Barack Obama and his radical associates.

Additionally,the Obama administration has, through its unilaterally determined rule making and regulatory powers, created laws out of whole cloth.&#65533; The Environmental Protection Agency on a near daily basis issues new regulations clearly out of their purview in order to modify and change environmental laws previously passed and to impose a radical green agenda never approved by Congress.&#65533; The same is true of the Energy and Interior Departments among many others.

None of these extra-constitutional actions have been challenged by Congress.&#65533; The left in America knows this usurpation of power is nearly impossible to reverse unless stopped in its early stages.

It is clearly the mindset of this administration and its appointees that Congress is merely a nuisance and can be ignored after they were able to take full advantage of the useful idiots in the Democrat-controlled House and Senate in 2009-2010 and the Democrat Senate in the current Congress.

Additionally, Barack Obama knows after his re-election a Republican-controlled House and Senate will not be able to enact any legislation to roll back the power previously granted to the Executive Branch or usurped by them.&#65533; His veto will not be overridden as there will always be at least 145 Democratic members of the House or 34 in the Senate in agreement with or intimidated by an administration more than willing to use Chicago style political tactics.

The stalemate between the Executive and Legislative Branches will inure to the benefit of Barack Obama and his fellow leftists.

The most significant power Congress has is the control of the purse-strings as all spending must be approved by them.&#65533;&#65533; However, once re-elected, Barack Obama, as confirmed by his willingness to do or say anything and his unscrupulous re-election tactics, would not only threaten government shutdowns but would deliberately withhold payments to those dependent on government support as a means of intimidating and forcing a Republican-controlled Congress to surrender to his demands, thus neutering their ability to control the administration through spending constraints.

Further, this administration has shown contempt for the courts by ignoring various court orders, e.g. the Gulf of Mexico oil drilling moratorium, as well as stonewalling subpoenas and requests issued by Congress.&#65533;&#65533; The Eric Holder Justice Department has become the epitome of corruption as part of the most dishonest and deceitful administration in American history.&#65533; In a second term the arrogance of Barack Obama and his minions will become more blatant as he will not have to be concerned with re-election.

Who will be there to enforce the rule of law, a Supreme Court ruling or the Constitution?&#65533;&#65533; No one.&#65533; Barack Obama and his fellow-travelers will be unchallenged as they run roughshod over the American people.

Many Republicans and conservatives dissatisfied with the prospect of Mitt Romney as the nominee for president are instead focused on re-taking the House and Senate.&#65533;&#65533; That goal, while worthy and necessary, is meaningless unless Barack Obama is defeated.&#65533; The nation is not dealing with a person of character and integrity but someone of single-minded purpose and overwhelming narcissism. Judging by his actions, words and deeds during his first term, he does not intend to work with Congress either Republican or Democrat in his second term but rather to force his radical agenda on the American people through the power he has usurped or been granted.

The governmental structure of the United States was set up by the founders in the hope that over the years only those people of high moral character and integrity would assume the reins of power. However, knowing that was not always possible, they dispersed power over three distinct and independent branches as a check on each other.

What they could not imagine is the surrender and abdication of its constitutional duty by the preeminent governmental branch, the Congress, to a chief executive devoid of any character or integrity coupled with a judiciary essentially powerless to enforce the law when the chief executive ignores them.

Conservatives, Libertarians, the Republican Party and Mitt Romney must come to grips with this moment in time and their historical role in denying Barack Obama and his minions their ultimate goal. All resources must be directed at that end-game and not merely controlling Congress and the various committee chairmanships.

&#65533;

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/obamas_second_term_transformation_plans.html&#65533;

&#65533;

We made our bed, now it's time to change the soiled sheets.
&#65533; br br Interesting read. br br But i... (show quote)


Don, I do believe you are suffering from AOM syndrome.



Reply
 
 
Jul 9, 2012 12:35:09   #
LittleRedFish Loc: Naw'lens (New Orleans)
 
DennisK wrote:
PNagy wrote:
Rachel wrote:
PNagy, you are a true Patriot.

I'm thankful for you sharing another point of view, and educating others so hopfully they understand that there is always another perspective.

You are my Hero for the day!!! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:



Thanks. That is an awesome compliment. At least my perspective is not partisan politics.


For being non partisan,you sure defend obummer a lot.


I don't feel he was defending any particular person as much as enlighting other that what they feel may just be fear that has been feed to them by people who want to control there thinking.

Fear has often been a tool to control people throughout history.....and history has a pattern of repeating itself.

Reply
Jul 9, 2012 12:40:25   #
RightOnStrange Loc: Bowling Green, Ohio
 
I don't need or want politics in the photography blogs I visit! It just upsets people and we start to view each other as 'friends' or 'foes' and usually disrespect starts happening. Do we really need this discussion here? Yes, I agree that political discsussion is important--vital! But in this hostile (and volatile) climate, I have become very careful who I discuss candidates and issues with as I have lost friends over politics, and I am a moderate! I have a choice, of course, to not read this blog, as I believe these blogs serve ONLY to find like-minded people and agitate those who aren't. There is no intention here to listen and discuss and certainly no intention inform or learn from each other. What a sad state this nation has become and it is not so much the fault of politicians but ourselves only. Free speech includes the responsibility of listening (preferably with respect regardless of excuses to not do so otherwise). Whatever happened to the true give-and-take of ideas and opinions a real discussion offers? : (

Reply
Jul 9, 2012 12:40:57   #
FotoFan
 
We have a wide divide in our opinions and knowledge about our government. We readily sling accusations and labels about each party. We have such a government now that is paranoia bound, watching and blocking each other that it has become immobilized - like deer in the headlights incapable of meaningful action.
What I understand about our economy is that no one knows how to fix it - not those in charge and not those who are the smartest people in our world. Look at the state Europe is in. Most of our leaders are whistling in the dark, hoping that the action they take will solve the problem. Did Obama do the right thing by bailing out the major industries in our country or did he waste a lot of money we don't have. Would we be in the worst depression ever imagined by Americans if he had not? No one really knows because any action taken is really based on economic theories being applied to new and unusual situations. Any party in power will basically do the same thing - like a best guess and avoid the worst scenario.
I don't think Obama and Romney are evil people trying to take control of our government. They are people who put themselves on the line to do what they can to help out the country. There are definitely evil people in the history of mankind but I don't think Obama and Romney are. If Romney is elected will he do better than Obama - will he be able to fight the entrenchment in Congress, will he be able to create jobs, will he be able to create an economy that we will be happy about. In my opinion, he will be handicapped just as Obama has been.All does not lie with the president. It lies in the system that has created itself and is taking us down into a spiral we cannot seem to get out off. I don't mean just America either. There is so much to fix that we are all deer in the headlights now, battling each other for our own righteous positions and really not going very far. The presidency is important but it will not solve our problems. Congress is an issue, the system is the issue. Once in awhile I hear a knowledgeable person talk about the system, but she/he is drowned out by the name calling, accusations and paranoia about communism, socialism, and whatever isms there are out there. Folks we are in deep trouble and it is getting worse.

Reply
Jul 9, 2012 12:48:37   #
CocoaRoger Loc: Cocoa Florida
 
This forum is ''general chit chat'' which in an election year will usually tend to focus on politics. This is not a photography forum, hence the words (non photography talk)

Reply
 
 
Jul 9, 2012 12:57:08   #
DennisK Loc: Pickle City,Illinois
 
Rachel wrote:
DennisK wrote:
PNagy wrote:
Rachel wrote:
PNagy, you are a true Patriot.

I'm thankful for you sharing another point of view, and educating others so hopfully they understand that there is always another perspective.

You are my Hero for the day!!! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:



Thanks. That is an awesome compliment. At least my perspective is not partisan politics.


For being non partisan,you sure defend obummer a lot.


I don't feel he was defending any particular person as much as enlighting other that what they feel may just be fear that has been feed to them by people who want to control there thinking.

Fear has often been a tool to control people throughout history.....and history has a pattern of repeating itself.
quote=DennisK quote=PNagy quote=Rachel PNagy, y... (show quote)


And I feel that he is a big boy now and can answer for himself.

Reply
Jul 9, 2012 12:58:35   #
RightOnStrange Loc: Bowling Green, Ohio
 
see below

Reply
Jul 9, 2012 12:59:57   #
RightOnStrange Loc: Bowling Green, Ohio
 
CocoaRoger wrote:
This forum is ''general chit chat'' which in an election year will usually tend to focus on politics. This is not a photography forum, hence the words (non photography talk)


I know, but I live in Ohio and we are so inundated with snarky political commercials that are on multiple times an hour that I cannot wait till this election is OVER and we all can be friends again (I dreaming, I know, it's never over). Signed, tired!

Reply
Jul 9, 2012 13:10:20   #
ted45 Loc: Delaware
 
PNagy wrote:
ted45 wrote:
mvyusmc wrote:
Blathering bullsheiss!

President Obama stopped the Republican Party's destructive control over America as witnessed in the reign of terror conducted by George Bush and his infamous Vice President, the profiteering hard ass known as Cheney.

These toadies led us into a war via fabricated evidence, and set the stage for their plundering Wall Street cronies to work their wrath on our economy, Moreover these creatures frequently attempted to bathe themselves in the spirit of Christianity, which is totally blasphemous.

When I see this version of fascism defended on UHH, I ponder about where these pundits gathered their facts. Wherever that may be, publishing such crap does not attest to a high quality of diligent thought.

All the best,

Martin.
Blathering bullsheiss! br br President Obama stop... (show quote)


Are you forgetting Viet Nam? Entered into by a Democrat President based on a story that has been proven to be 100% false.
quote=mvyusmc Blathering bullsheiss! br br Presi... (show quote)


Let us set the record straight: The Vietnam "commitment" began when president Eisenhower personally blocked a free election stipulated by the Geneva Accords. His reason for this was that the wrong man was destined to win. Eisenhower sent "advisors" into the country to assure that his will would be executed. Advisors were actually American troops who fought when they were not advising. The advisors numbered 16,000 by the Kennedy administration.
quote=ted45 quote=mvyusmc Blathering bullsheiss!... (show quote)


Our commitment began as you say but you are wrong about the advisors.

Officially the first soldier killed in the Viet Nam War was Air Force T-Sgt. Richard B. Fitzgibbon Jr. He was murdered by another member of the U.S. Air Force on June 8, 1956. Eisenhower was President at the time. He is listed on the wall as the first casualty.

The first battlefield fatality was Specialist 4 James T. Davis who was killed during an abmbush by Viet Cong on December 22, 1961. President Lyndon Johnson termed Davis "the first American to fall in the defense of our freedom in Vietnam". He was an intelligence agent for a group called the ASA. Johnson, spoiling for a fight with the North Vietnamese invented the Tonkin Gulf incident during August 1964, which is generally recognized as the start of the Viet Nam War. The first fully armed and outfitted combat troops from the United States Marines landed during the last few days of February 1965. I know, because I was one of them. Our landing was not made known to the public until late May or June of 1965.

My unit was sent to Hue Phu Bai with the mission to guard a detachment of U.S. advisors. I spoke to several of these guys. They were mostly intelligence and training officers. They avoided direct combat like the plague. We all did. Nobody wanted to go home in a body bag.

During September 1965, T-Sgt. Richard B. Fitzgibbons son, now a U.S. Marine, was killed in action in Viet Nam. On September 4, 1965 I lost a duel with a Viet Cong machine gun and took a round in the head.

Now we have "set the record straight".

Reply
 
 
Jul 9, 2012 13:13:06   #
beverett Loc: los angeles
 
Like whoever you want, but here's an oddsmaker's view on the election outcome:

>> A Las Vegas "odds maker" opines on why Obama will get "killed" by Romney in November.
>> Wayne Allyn Root
>> May 30, 2012
>> Town hall Alerts
>>
>> Most political predictions are made by biased pollsters, pundits, or prognosticators who are either rooting for Republicans or Democrats. I am neither. I am a former Libertarian Vice Presidential nominee, and a well-known Vegas oddsmaker with one of the most accurate records of predicting political races.
>>
>> But as an oddsmaker with a pretty remarkable track record of picking political races, I play no favorites. I simply use common sense to call them as I see them. Back in late December I released my New Years Predictions. I predicted back then- before a single GOP primary had been held, with Romney trailing for months to almost every GOP competitor from Rick Perry to Herman Cain to Newt- that Romney would easily rout his competition to win the GOP nomination by a landslide. I also predicted that the Presidential race between Obama and Romney would be very close until election day. But that on election day Romney would win by a landslide similar to Reagan-Carter in 1980.
>>
>> Understanding history, today I am even more convinced of a resounding Romney victory. 32 years ago at this moment in time, Reagan was losing by 9 points to Carter. Romney is right now running even in polls. So why do most pollsters give Obama the edge?
>>
>> First, most pollsters are missing one ingredient- common sense. Here is my gut instinct. Not one American who voted for McCain 4 years ago will switch to Obama. Not one in all the land. But many millions of people who voted for an unknown Obama 4 years ago are angry, disillusioned, turned off, or scared about the future. Voters know Obama now- and that is a bad harbinger.
>>
>> Now to an analysis of the voting blocks that matter in U.S. politics:
>> *Black voters. Obama has nowhere to go but down among this group. His endorsement of gay marriage has alienated many black church-going Christians. He may get 88% of their vote instead of the 96% he got in 2008. This is not good news for Obama.
>>
>> *Hispanic voters. Obama has nowhere to go but down among this group. If Romney picks Rubio as his VP running-mate the GOP may pick up an extra 10% to 15% of Hispanic voters (plus lock down Florida). This is not good news for Obama.
>>
>> *Jewish voters. Obama has been weak in his support of Israel. Many Jewish voters and big donors are angry and disappointed. I predict Obama's Jewish support drops from 78% in 2008 to the low 60s. This is not good news for Obama.
>>
>> *Youth voters. Obama's biggest and most enthusiastic believers from 4 years ago have graduated into a job market from hell. Young people are disillusioned, frightened, and broke- a bad combination. The enthusiasm is long gone. Turnout will be much lower among young voters, as will actual voting percentages. This not good news for Obama.
>>
>> *Catholic voters. Obama won a majority of Catholics in 2008. That won't happen again. Out of desperation to please women, Obama went to war with the Catholic Church over contraception. Now he is being sued by the Catholic Church. Majority lost. This is not good news for Obama.
>>
>> *Small Business owners. Because I ran for Vice President last time around, and I'm a small businessman myself, I know literally thousands of small business owners. At least 40% of them in my circle of friends, fans and supporters voted for Obama 4 years ago to give someone different a chance. I warned them that he would pursue a war on capitalism and demonize anyone who owned a business...that he'd support unions over the private sector in a big way...that he'd overwhelm the economy with spending and debt. My friends didn't listen. Four years later, I can't find one person in my circle of small business owner friends voting for Obama. Not one. This is not good news for Obama.
>>
>> *Blue collar working class whites. Do I need to say a thing? White working class voters are about as happy with Obama as Boston Red Sox fans feel about the New York Yankees. This is not good news for Obama.
>>
>> *Suburban moms. The issue isn't contraceptionÂ…it's hhaving a job to pay for contraception. Obama's economy frightens these moms. They are worried about putting food on the table. They fear for their children's future. This is not good news for Obama.
>>
>> *Military Veterans. McCain won this group by 10 points. Romney is winning by 24 points. The more our military vets got to see of Obama, the more they disliked him. This is not good news for Obama.
>>
>> Add it up. Is there one major group where Obama has gained since 2008? Will anyone in America wake up on election day saying "I didn't vote for Obama 4 years ago. But he's done such a fantastic job, I can't wait to vote for him today." Does anyone feel that a vote for Obama makes their job more secure?
>>
>> Forget the polls. My gut instincts as a Vegas oddsmaker and common sense small businessman tell me this will be a historic landslide and a world-class repudiation of Obama's radical and risky socialist agenda. It's Reagan-Carter all over again.
>>
>> But I'll give Obama credit for one thing - he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.

Reply
Jul 9, 2012 13:21:42   #
overthemoon Loc: Wisconsin
 
tschmath wrote:
donrent wrote:
&#65533;

Interesting read.

But it all makes sense &#65533; the steps are in place to totally take over this country&#65533; Note that this was written over a month before Obama's illegal Executive Order providing amnesty for over 800,000 illegal immigrants, a good example of what McCann predicted Obama will continue to do if re-elected... A frightening prospect.

By Steve McCann
May 8, 2012 American Thinker

The 2012 election has often been described as the most pivotal since 1860.&#65533; This statement is not hyperbole.&#65533;&#65533; If Barack Obama is re-elected the United States will never be the same, nor will it be able to re-capture its once lofty status as the most dominant nation in the history of mankind.

The overwhelming majority of Americans do not understand that Obama's first term was dedicated to putting in place executive power to enable him and the administration to fulfill the campaign promise of "transforming America" in his second term regardless of which political party controls Congress.&#65533; That is why his re-election team is virtually ignoring the plight of incumbent or prospective Democratic Party office holders.

The most significant accomplishment of Obama's first term is to make Congress irrelevant.&#65533;&#65533; Under the myopic and blindly loyal leadership of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, the Democrats have succeeded in creating an imperial and, in a second term, a potential dictatorial presidency.

During the first two years of the Obama administration when the Democrats overwhelming controlled both Houses of Congress and the media was in an Obama worshiping stupor, a myriad of laws were passed and actions taken which transferred virtually unlimited power to the executive branch.

The birth of multi-thousand page laws was not an aberration. This tactic was adopted so the bureaucracy controlled by Obama appointees would have sole discretion in interpreting vaguely written laws and enforcing thousands of pages of regulations they and not Congress would subsequently write.

For example, in the 2,700 pages of ObamaCare there are more than 2,500 references to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. There are more than 700 instances when he or she is instructed that they "shall" do something and more than 200 times when they "may" take at their sole discretion some form of regulatory action. On 139 occasions, the law mentions that the "Secretary determines."&#65533; In essence one person, appointed by and reporting to the president, will be in charge of the health care of 310 million Americans once ObamaCare is fully operational in 2014.

The same is true in the 2,319 pages of the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Act which confers nearly unlimited power on various agencies to control by fiat the nation's financial, banking and investment sectors.&#65533; The bill also creates new agencies, such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, not subject to any oversight by Congress.&#65533; This overall process was repeated numerous times with other legislation all with the intent of granting unfettered power to the executive branch controlled Barack Obama and his radical associates.

Additionally,the Obama administration has, through its unilaterally determined rule making and regulatory powers, created laws out of whole cloth.&#65533; The Environmental Protection Agency on a near daily basis issues new regulations clearly out of their purview in order to modify and change environmental laws previously passed and to impose a radical green agenda never approved by Congress.&#65533; The same is true of the Energy and Interior Departments among many others.

None of these extra-constitutional actions have been challenged by Congress.&#65533; The left in America knows this usurpation of power is nearly impossible to reverse unless stopped in its early stages.

It is clearly the mindset of this administration and its appointees that Congress is merely a nuisance and can be ignored after they were able to take full advantage of the useful idiots in the Democrat-controlled House and Senate in 2009-2010 and the Democrat Senate in the current Congress.

Additionally, Barack Obama knows after his re-election a Republican-controlled House and Senate will not be able to enact any legislation to roll back the power previously granted to the Executive Branch or usurped by them.&#65533; His veto will not be overridden as there will always be at least 145 Democratic members of the House or 34 in the Senate in agreement with or intimidated by an administration more than willing to use Chicago style political tactics.

The stalemate between the Executive and Legislative Branches will inure to the benefit of Barack Obama and his fellow leftists.

The most significant power Congress has is the control of the purse-strings as all spending must be approved by them.&#65533;&#65533; However, once re-elected, Barack Obama, as confirmed by his willingness to do or say anything and his unscrupulous re-election tactics, would not only threaten government shutdowns but would deliberately withhold payments to those dependent on government support as a means of intimidating and forcing a Republican-controlled Congress to surrender to his demands, thus neutering their ability to control the administration through spending constraints.

Further, this administration has shown contempt for the courts by ignoring various court orders, e.g. the Gulf of Mexico oil drilling moratorium, as well as stonewalling subpoenas and requests issued by Congress.&#65533;&#65533; The Eric Holder Justice Department has become the epitome of corruption as part of the most dishonest and deceitful administration in American history.&#65533; In a second term the arrogance of Barack Obama and his minions will become more blatant as he will not have to be concerned with re-election.

Who will be there to enforce the rule of law, a Supreme Court ruling or the Constitution?&#65533;&#65533; No one.&#65533; Barack Obama and his fellow-travelers will be unchallenged as they run roughshod over the American people.

Many Republicans and conservatives dissatisfied with the prospect of Mitt Romney as the nominee for president are instead focused on re-taking the House and Senate.&#65533;&#65533; That goal, while worthy and necessary, is meaningless unless Barack Obama is defeated.&#65533; The nation is not dealing with a person of character and integrity but someone of single-minded purpose and overwhelming narcissism. Judging by his actions, words and deeds during his first term, he does not intend to work with Congress either Republican or Democrat in his second term but rather to force his radical agenda on the American people through the power he has usurped or been granted.

The governmental structure of the United States was set up by the founders in the hope that over the years only those people of high moral character and integrity would assume the reins of power. However, knowing that was not always possible, they dispersed power over three distinct and independent branches as a check on each other.

What they could not imagine is the surrender and abdication of its constitutional duty by the preeminent governmental branch, the Congress, to a chief executive devoid of any character or integrity coupled with a judiciary essentially powerless to enforce the law when the chief executive ignores them.

Conservatives, Libertarians, the Republican Party and Mitt Romney must come to grips with this moment in time and their historical role in denying Barack Obama and his minions their ultimate goal. All resources must be directed at that end-game and not merely controlling Congress and the various committee chairmanships.

&#65533;

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/obamas_second_term_transformation_plans.html&#65533;

&#65533;

We made our bed, now it's time to change the soiled sheets.
&#65533; br br Interesting read. br br But i... (show quote)


As soon as I read about the "2700 pages of Obamacare" I knew the rest of this guy's rant was bulls**t. I don't believe a single thing he says because at that point he lost all credibility.

I can sit here and refute everything he says but it's all been done again and again and again intense posts and it's just not worth time any more. So go right ahead and hunker down for the coming apocalypse.
quote=donrent &#65533; br br Interesting rea... (show quote)


over reaction bull shit why don't people read what he has done.Why have people forgotten what he inherrited from the bush admin the biggest crisis since the crash of the stock market. As I see it we need Obama Romney is a joke

Reply
Jul 9, 2012 13:23:22   #
overthemoon Loc: Wisconsin
 
CocoaRoger wrote:
Read this and really ask yourself if you want Republicans running this country anymore. Ask yourself, what have they done for me (other than make me afraid of Democrats)????


THANK YOU

Reply
Jul 9, 2012 13:54:27   #
rrforster12 Loc: Leesburg Florida
 
If we are talking about shipping jobs out of the USA just take a look at what General Motors has done with our bailout.
They have built more plants in China then they have existing in the USA. We basically have saved the company for the benefit of the Chinese government which just happens to be Communist. If you want the facts take a look at http://Youtube.com/watch_popup?V=Lv15Gan69Wo
This will make your blood boil and give you a strong reason to change our governments leaders.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 18 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.