Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Amateur or Beginning Photographers: Upgrade Or Not?
Page <<first <prev 7 of 9 next> last>>
Oct 20, 2017 15:11:04   #
Edia Loc: Central New Jersey
 
He who has the most toys when he dies, wins. If you can afford it, you can have the same equipment that a pro photographer has. The question is always, what are you going to do with all that power? The analogy is driving a 200 mph Ferrari on a 55 mph road. You will never be able to use all that capability. Some people want to flaunt it anyway. That said, the things that really improve photography are better lenses, lighting and knowledge. Given any of today's cameras, a knowledgeable photographer can get better results than an a less knowledgeable photographer using the top of the line equipment.

As for the Nikon D850, it is the top of the heap right now. Next year, there will be something better. That is the way technology goes. Does that mean you have to upgrade every time something new and improved comes along? I think not. A year and half ago, my 2 year twin grandsons went to a Photographer's studio for a photo shoot. The Pro photographer was using a Nikon D200 with a pro level Nikon 105 mm lens. The output was crystal clear. So he was using a 10 year old camera with only 12 MP resolution but that was sufficient for the 8x10 photos generated. The bottom line is that the equipment is only part of the puzzle for getting good results.

Reply
Oct 20, 2017 16:05:05   #
bobsisk Loc: Chandler, Arizona
 
ltcarizona wrote:
I post this question for discussion for those beginners in photography regarding upgrading cameras. This is based on other questions I have seen posted on this site. I understand everyone has the opinions and there are those who have to have the best. But I always look at this question based on your level of photography expertise. I have gone thru the process and I am glad I had a professional to work with. I had the opportunity in my time to learn from photography instructors, professional photographers, and Playboy. It really does make a difference!

For example a person has a Nikon D7200 and is thinking about upgrading to the Nikon D850. Money is not a problem. So what do we tell him that is realistic and best for him?

Since this person has said money is no problem why not just tell him to buy it since he can grow into it even if he does not have the experience, skills, or needs the abilities the new camera offers him for what he wants to do with it. Heck why not just tell him to buy a Leica or the medium format cameras. But?

The one thing every photographer knows is that an amateur or beginner has to start somewhere. While camera are so smart they basically become a high price fix lens rangefinder camera with the professional look. Therefore until the amateur or beginner has the following I do not recommend going into the high priced cameras: 1. Developed level of photography basics through some on hands training with another experienced photographer. 2. The photography he is going to be undertaking or specialize in needs an advanced pro level camera. 3. And he is willing to spend the money on the level of glass or lenses that support that camera to its fullest.

After all why spend money on a 44 Magnum when the 9mm can shoot more rounds more accurately and be just a deadly. Maybe because you want to be the big boy on the block. But in real life shooting cases the 9 mm for rounds on target accuracy would win out. Don't forget the other guy will be shooting at you.

So much the same with photography in a way. Right now I own a Nikon D810 after owning since 1973 a variety of Nikon and Canon film, FX and DX cameras; from the very expensive to least. I know that the camera doesn't truly make the photographer but his skills as such. A entry level DSLR can win photography contests just like the professional cameras, and that is a fact.

So I ask myself should I upgrade to the D850? My answer is NO. Why you ask? Because I am a landscape photographer mostly, do not take astrophotography, but still could with the D810, do not really need the extra MP, don't need the little faster motor drive, etc. So for me I will wait for something else to come along. Here I am looking a my needs as a photographer ever though I could buy the most expensive camera in the world; though it would not make me a better photographer. I could go on with other points that I think others to this forum could make.

SO, What does everyone else think?
I post this question for discussion for those begi... (show quote)


I agree with one tiny reservation. If this well healed person has done the research and finds that this more expensive camera does something he/she wants to do that the current camera won't do or only does marginally, then go for it.

Reply
Oct 20, 2017 16:25:57   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Some may have found that part of their enjoyment is seeing others whine about their choices.

Reply
 
 
Oct 20, 2017 17:05:50   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
DaveO wrote:
Some may have found that part of their enjoyment is seeing others whine about their choices.

Seems that you have connection problems again....

Reply
Oct 20, 2017 17:51:59   #
srherrmann Loc: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
 
There is an old piece of advice I've heard many times "buy the best glass you can afford". There is no mention of ones skill status. Why should it be any different with other camera gear.

Reply
Oct 20, 2017 18:00:36   #
aellman Loc: Boston MA
 
ltcarizona wrote:
I post this question for discussion for those beginners in photography regarding upgrading cameras. This is based on other questions I have seen posted on this site. I understand everyone has the opinions and there are those who have to have the best. But I always look at this question based on your level of photography expertise. I have gone thru the process and I am glad I had a professional to work with. I had the opportunity in my time to learn from photography instructors, professional photographers, and Playboy. It really does make a difference!

For example a person has a Nikon D7200 and is thinking about upgrading to the Nikon D850. Money is not a problem. So what do we tell him that is realistic and best for him?

Since this person has said money is no problem why not just tell him to buy it since he can grow into it even if he does not have the experience, skills, or needs the abilities the new camera offers him for what he wants to do with it. Heck why not just tell him to buy a Leica or the medium format cameras. But?

The one thing every photographer knows is that an amateur or beginner has to start somewhere. While camera are so smart they basically become a high price fix lens rangefinder camera with the professional look. Therefore until the amateur or beginner has the following I do not recommend going into the high priced cameras: 1. Developed level of photography basics through some on hands training with another experienced photographer. 2. The photography he is going to be undertaking or specialize in needs an advanced pro level camera. 3. And he is willing to spend the money on the level of glass or lenses that support that camera to its fullest.

After all why spend money on a 44 Magnum when the 9mm can shoot more rounds more accurately and be just a deadly. Maybe because you want to be the big boy on the block. But in real life shooting cases the 9 mm for rounds on target accuracy would win out. Don't forget the other guy will be shooting at you.

So much the same with photography in a way. Right now I own a Nikon D810 after owning since 1973 a variety of Nikon and Canon film, FX and DX cameras; from the very expensive to least. I know that the camera doesn't truly make the photographer but his skills as such. A entry level DSLR can win photography contests just like the professional cameras, and that is a fact.

So I ask myself should I upgrade to the D850? My answer is NO. Why you ask? Because I am a landscape photographer mostly, do not take astrophotography, but still could with the D810, do not really need the extra MP, don't need the little faster motor drive, etc. So for me I will wait for something else to come along. Here I am looking a my needs as a photographer ever though I could buy the most expensive camera in the world; though it would not make me a better photographer. I could go on with other points that I think others to this forum could make.

SO, What does everyone else think?
I post this question for discussion for those begi... (show quote)



I think you could learn a lot about brevity and editing. If your camera is giving you what you need, to not fall prey to the manufacturers' call to upgrade.

Reply
Oct 20, 2017 18:05:17   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Rongnongno wrote:
Seems that you have connection problems again....


Gee, thanks for pointing that out.

Reply
 
 
Oct 20, 2017 18:09:42   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
aellman wrote:
I think you could learn a lot about brevity and editing. If your camera is giving you what you need, to not fall prey to the manufacturers' call to upgrade.


You could use some editing skills. Your second sentence does not make any sense.

Reply
Oct 20, 2017 18:30:42   #
sirlensalot Loc: Arizona
 
ltcarizona wrote:
I post this question for discussion for those beginners in photography regarding upgrading cameras. This is based on other questions I have seen posted on this site. I understand everyone has the opinions and there are those who have to have the best. But I always look at this question based on your level of photography expertise. I have gone thru the process and I am glad I had a professional to work with. I had the opportunity in my time to learn from photography instructors, professional photographers, and Playboy. It really does make a difference!

For example a person has a Nikon D7200 and is thinking about upgrading to the Nikon D850. Money is not a problem. So what do we tell him that is realistic and best for him?

Since this person has said money is no problem why not just tell him to buy it since he can grow into it even if he does not have the experience, skills, or needs the abilities the new camera offers him for what he wants to do with it. Heck why not just tell him to buy a Leica or the medium format cameras. But?

The one thing every photographer knows is that an amateur or beginner has to start somewhere. While camera are so smart they basically become a high price fix lens rangefinder camera with the professional look. Therefore until the amateur or beginner has the following I do not recommend going into the high priced cameras: 1. Developed level of photography basics through some on hands training with another experienced photographer. 2. The photography he is going to be undertaking or specialize in needs an advanced pro level camera. 3. And he is willing to spend the money on the level of glass or lenses that support that camera to its fullest.

After all why spend money on a 44 Magnum when the 9mm can shoot more rounds more accurately and be just a deadly. Maybe because you want to be the big boy on the block. But in real life shooting cases the 9 mm for rounds on target accuracy would win out. Don't forget the other guy will be shooting at you.

So much the same with photography in a way. Right now I own a Nikon D810 after owning since 1973 a variety of Nikon and Canon film, FX and DX cameras; from the very expensive to least. I know that the camera doesn't truly make the photographer but his skills as such. A entry level DSLR can win photography contests just like the professional cameras, and that is a fact.

So I ask myself should I upgrade to the D850? My answer is NO. Why you ask? Because I am a landscape photographer mostly, do not take astrophotography, but still could with the D810, do not really need the extra MP, don't need the little faster motor drive, etc. So for me I will wait for something else to come along. Here I am looking a my needs as a photographer ever though I could buy the most expensive camera in the world; though it would not make me a better photographer. I could go on with other points that I think others to this forum could make.

SO, What does everyone else think?
I post this question for discussion for those begi... (show quote)





IMO, I think it depends on the goal(s) of the beginner. It still comes down to a few items. Large prints - large sensor. more MP's. Sports - High FPS, excellent AF and AF tracking. I do not do landscapes, but I think the OP is dead on regarding needing an upgrade for landscapes. Same for portraits IMO. With money not an object, it removes all barriers with the exception of common sense, which in the OP's case prevailed. I still use my Canon 5D for portraits and weddings, but I use my Sony a6000 for indoor sports. Each has its strong and weak points but they do best for what I need them for. Fast lenses help a lot.

Reply
Oct 20, 2017 22:30:05   #
bikertut Loc: Kingsville, MO
 
ltcarizona wrote:
I post this question for discussion for those beginners in photography regarding upgrading cameras. This is based on other questions I have seen posted on this site. I understand everyone has the opinions and there are those who have to have the best. But I always look at this question based on your level of photography expertise. I have gone thru the process and I am glad I had a professional to work with. I had the opportunity in my time to learn from photography instructors, professional photographers, and Playboy. It really does make a difference!

For example a person has a Nikon D7200 and is thinking about upgrading to the Nikon D850. Money is not a problem. So what do we tell him that is realistic and best for him?

Since this person has said money is no problem why not just tell him to buy it since he can grow into it even if he does not have the experience, skills, or needs the abilities the new camera offers him for what he wants to do with it. Heck why not just tell him to buy a Leica or the medium format cameras. But?

The one thing every photographer knows is that an amateur or beginner has to start somewhere. While camera are so smart they basically become a high price fix lens rangefinder camera with the professional look. Therefore until the amateur or beginner has the following I do not recommend going into the high priced cameras: 1. Developed level of photography basics through some on hands training with another experienced photographer. 2. The photography he is going to be undertaking or specialize in needs an advanced pro level camera. 3. And he is willing to spend the money on the level of glass or lenses that support that camera to its fullest.

After all why spend money on a 44 Magnum when the 9mm can shoot more rounds more accurately and be just a deadly. Maybe because you want to be the big boy on the block. But in real life shooting cases the 9 mm for rounds on target accuracy would win out. Don't forget the other guy will be shooting at you.

So much the same with photography in a way. Right now I own a Nikon D810 after owning since 1973 a variety of Nikon and Canon film, FX and DX cameras; from the very expensive to least. I know that the camera doesn't truly make the photographer but his skills as such. A entry level DSLR can win photography contests just like the professional cameras, and that is a fact.

So I ask myself should I upgrade to the D850? My answer is NO. Why you ask? Because I am a landscape photographer mostly, do not take astrophotography, but still could with the D810, do not really need the extra MP, don't need the little faster motor drive, etc. So for me I will wait for something else to come along. Here I am looking a my needs as a photographer ever though I could buy the most expensive camera in the world; though it would not make me a better photographer. I could go on with other points that I think others to this forum could make.

SO, What does everyone else think?
I post this question for discussion for those begi... (show quote)


Great question and good answers, but now I have a question. What about the "fun factor"?

What if someone can afford it and "needs" an 850 simply because he thinks it would be fun to have it. Isn't that reason enough?

I rather shoot (spoiler alert, revolver anology) one of my Colt Pythons than a Rossi revolver. Will I shoot better with the Python, maybe. Will I have more fun even if I miss, definitely!!

Steve
Still shooting my D3100 (and still learning)

Reply
Oct 20, 2017 23:15:49   #
jimisready Loc: Sacramento/Carson City
 
I say buy the best lenses first then when you can afford the best bodies get them. I have purchased the
Amature bodies for my system while slowly buying the best pro lenses. Now I can make a purchase of a current pro body and have saved a couple $ thousand. And have a great system. If you have 5 or 10k to spend all at once that is great but most of us don't. I had a photo used for a local annual calendar. My camera was a Fuji x10 small sensor but a good photo.

Reply
 
 
Oct 20, 2017 23:31:12   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
Edia wrote:
He who has the most toys when he dies, wins. If you can afford it, you can have the same equipment that a pro photographer has. The question is always, what are you going to do with all that power? The analogy is driving a 200 mph Ferrari on a 55 mph road. You will never be able to use all that capability. Some people want to flaunt it anyway. That said, the things that really improve photography are better lenses, lighting and knowledge. Given any of today's cameras, a knowledgeable photographer can get better results than an a less knowledgeable photographer using the top of the line equipment.

As for the Nikon D850, it is the top of the heap right now. Next year, there will be something better. That is the way technology goes. Does that mean you have to upgrade every time something new and improved comes along? I think not. A year and half ago, my 2 year twin grandsons went to a Photographer's studio for a photo shoot. The Pro photographer was using a Nikon D200 with a pro level Nikon 105 mm lens. The output was crystal clear. So he was using a 10 year old camera with only 12 MP resolution but that was sufficient for the 8x10 photos generated. The bottom line is that the equipment is only part of the puzzle for getting good results.
He who has the most toys when he dies, wins. If yo... (show quote)


Sorry, when you die, you lose. Others around you “may” win, depending on what you leave behind.

Reply
Oct 21, 2017 03:16:13   #
bigdukeor
 
I have been looking at upgrading to a D810 from a D600. I get really good results with the 600, but since I do enlargements to 24x36 quite a bit, would like the extra Mb's. Also, the lack of the AA filter internally is a good enhancement on sharpness, from what I am told.

Reply
Oct 21, 2017 04:11:58   #
papa Loc: Rio Dell, CA
 
I think you should get the "Desert Eagle".
ltcarizona wrote:
I post this question for discussion for those beginners in photography regarding upgrading cameras. This is based on other questions I have seen posted on this site. I understand everyone has the opinions and there are those who have to have the best. But I always look at this question based on your level of photography expertise. I have gone thru the process and I am glad I had a professional to work with. I had the opportunity in my time to learn from photography instructors, professional photographers, and Playboy. It really does make a difference!

For example a person has a Nikon D7200 and is thinking about upgrading to the Nikon D850. Money is not a problem. So what do we tell him that is realistic and best for him?

Since this person has said money is no problem why not just tell him to buy it since he can grow into it even if he does not have the experience, skills, or needs the abilities the new camera offers him for what he wants to do with it. Heck why not just tell him to buy a Leica or the medium format cameras. But?

The one thing every photographer knows is that an amateur or beginner has to start somewhere. While camera are so smart they basically become a high price fix lens rangefinder camera with the professional look. Therefore until the amateur or beginner has the following I do not recommend going into the high priced cameras: 1. Developed level of photography basics through some on hands training with another experienced photographer. 2. The photography he is going to be undertaking or specialize in needs an advanced pro level camera. 3. And he is willing to spend the money on the level of glass or lenses that support that camera to its fullest.

After all why spend money on a 44 Magnum when the 9mm can shoot more rounds more accurately and be just a deadly. Maybe because you want to be the big boy on the block. But in real life shooting cases the 9 mm for rounds on target accuracy would win out. Don't forget the other guy will be shooting at you.

So much the same with photography in a way. Right now I own a Nikon D810 after owning since 1973 a variety of Nikon and Canon film, FX and DX cameras; from the very expensive to least. I know that the camera doesn't truly make the photographer but his skills as such. A entry level DSLR can win photography contests just like the professional cameras, and that is a fact.

So I ask myself should I upgrade to the D850? My answer is NO. Why you ask? Because I am a landscape photographer mostly, do not take astrophotography, but still could with the D810, do not really need the extra MP, don't need the little faster motor drive, etc. So for me I will wait for something else to come along. Here I am looking a my needs as a photographer ever though I could buy the most expensive camera in the world; though it would not make me a better photographer. I could go on with other points that I think others to this forum could make.

SO, What does everyone else think?
I post this question for discussion for those begi... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 21, 2017 05:27:20   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
bikertut wrote:
Great question and good answers, but now I have a question. What about the "fun factor"?

What if someone can afford it and "needs" an 850 simply because he thinks it would be fun to have it. Isn't that reason enough?

I rather shoot (spoiler alert, revolver anology) one of my Colt Pythons than a Rossi revolver. Will I shoot better with the Python, maybe. Will I have more fun even if I miss, definitely!!

Steve
Still shooting my D3100 (and still learning)
Great question and good answers, but now I have a ... (show quote)


Same here on shooting. Either a genuine 45-70 Trap Door or it's not interesting.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.