Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
Polarizer question
Oct 13, 2017 11:25:27 #
Sometimes but less often than before. I've found that in PCC I can emulate the function of a CP fairly closely for most situations. The new Dehaze filter in Adobe Camera Raw reduces the effect of glare in an image, producing a saturation effect. Reducing Highlights and adjusting the Whites slider in ACR bring out image information.
I've found also that using Exposure Lock on my Canon camera, I can properly expose for the sky, and then later bring up darker image areas in PCC.
Both my Canon 6D and 6DII have good noise control at lower ISO settings, allowing me to practice this technique.
I grant that nothing, as yet, totally compensates for the use of a CP.
I've just found another way to do photography minus a CP.
I've found also that using Exposure Lock on my Canon camera, I can properly expose for the sky, and then later bring up darker image areas in PCC.
Both my Canon 6D and 6DII have good noise control at lower ISO settings, allowing me to practice this technique.
I grant that nothing, as yet, totally compensates for the use of a CP.
I've just found another way to do photography minus a CP.
shuck wrote:
How often do you landscape photographers use a circular polarizer?
Oct 13, 2017 11:27:26 #
JohanneT wrote:
My advise is not to get a cheap polarize filter. They can be very annoying with al kinds of flare and streaks and scratch easily.
What's cheap? How much should I spend?
Oct 13, 2017 11:42:34 #
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Oct 13, 2017 11:49:24 #
Depending on the scene, a polarizer and a 25A filter will really define the clouds.
--Bob
--Bob
adamsg wrote:
That is a good statement of how I use a polarizer in my landscape work. Better cloud definition, without creating an artificially blue sky is the thing. Water and other reflective surfaces also often call for a polarizer. I don't use it all the time, but do enjoy its benefits when needed.
Oct 13, 2017 11:50:14 #
This review may give you some guidance: http://kenrockwell.com/hoya/hd-filters.htm
fotoman150 wrote:
What's cheap? How much should I spend?
Oct 13, 2017 11:56:52 #
Look at B and H for B+W filters. That will give you a good idea of both quality and what you can expect to pay for it.
--Bob
--Bob
fotoman150 wrote:
What's cheap? How much should I spend?
Oct 13, 2017 12:04:16 #
Very often - depending on a sunlight angle and also the amount of green foliage in the frame.
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Oct 13, 2017 12:09:27 #
AlfredU
Loc: Mooresville, NC
rmalarz wrote:
Look at B and H for B+W filters. That will give you a good idea of both quality and what you can expect to pay for it.
--Bob
--Bob
Geez, Bob, agreed again. B+W filters, but best Greman glass and brass hardware. Pricey but worth it on good lenses. Hoya is my second choice. Quality is especially important with a polarizer.
Oct 13, 2017 12:11:32 #
OK. After reading these answers I think I will be using a polarizer more than before. I have a Nikon filter I used on my film cameras. I'm considering buying a Nikkor 18-140 to replacer my D 80 kit lens, so I will order a 67mm polarizer with it. Now: My old filter is a Nikon. Is Nikon worth the difference in price over a Hoya?
Oct 13, 2017 12:24:00 #
bpulv
Loc: Buena Park, CA
shuck wrote:
How often do you landscape photographers use a circular polarizer?
I sense that your real question is not "how often ....", but rather, "will I use it enough to warrant the expense?" Only you can answer that question because only you know what types of landscapes and other subjects you shoot and how often. I think the best help I can give you is to tell you situations where it will add to the quality of your pictures and then you must decide for yourself if you need one.
I use CPFs for multiple categories of subjects including sky enhancement, photos that must be taken through a window or that have windows with unwanted specular highlights, water, and reflective surfaces such as automobiles. If I am shooting landscapes where I want a beautiful sky, I always use a CPF if the angle to the sun is correct; about 90 degrees. Regardless of the category of the subject, a CPF will only work or partially work if the angle is correct. If I am on the water I always use a CPF not only for dramatic skies, but also to cut through the specular highlights from small waves and other reflections from the water surface.
Oct 13, 2017 12:27:14 #
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Oct 13, 2017 12:27:51 #
bpulv
Loc: Buena Park, CA
shuck wrote:
OK. After reading these answers I think I will be using a polarizer more than before. I have a Nikon filter I used on my film cameras. I'm considering buying a Nikkor 18-140 to replacer my D 80 kit lens, so I will order a 67mm polarizer with it. Now: My old filter is a Nikon. Is Nikon worth the difference in price over a Hoya?
Depending on the Hoya filter (they make CPF filters with different designs and qualities), their top end filters are superior to the Nikon CPF. If you want the best, I would recommend B+W filters.
Oct 13, 2017 13:12:34 #
Lucius
Loc: Denver, Colorado
Like all things you create, when every you want to add that element. It is a very individual choice as to what you want your product to look like
Oct 13, 2017 13:18:41 #
Oct 13, 2017 13:26:56 #
leftj
Loc: Texas
bpulv wrote:
Depending on the Hoya filter (they make CPF filters with different designs and qualities), their top end filters are superior to the Nikon CPF. If you want the best, I would recommend B+W filters.
Hard to believe they could be better than Breakthrough filters.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.