toxdoc42 wrote:
I don't believe in blaming the buyer. Yes, caveat emptor, but again, why do you assume that a purchaser of a camera would know that VR is more important in the longer zoom?
The manufacturer knew, or did it not?
If Nikon was trying to be responsible to its customers, why did it not "save money" by putting the VR version of the longer lens in the "kit" an making the smaller lens non-VR?
Sorry, I think this was poor customer relations.
Umm, if you bother to research, Nikon usually has an "entry level" package and a "upper level" or advanced amateur package. It's NOT Nikon's fault that the local store CHOSE to go with the less expensive package rather than the upgrade. The store figured that since the D3400 is an entry level camera so the store stuck with an entry level package.