Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Links and Resources
8 reasons to shoot JPEGs over Raw files
Page 1 of 2 next>
Sep 30, 2017 03:58:18   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/tutorials/8-reasons-to-shoot-jpegs-over-raw-files

Reply
Sep 30, 2017 05:03:24   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Racmanaz wrote:
http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/tutorials/8-reasons-to-shoot-jpegs-over-raw-files


This will generate a comment or two.

I don't disagree with any of the eight reasons, but raw can allow for a wider range of adjustments - if necessary.

Reply
Sep 30, 2017 05:45:28   #
Hank Radt
 
jerryc41 wrote:
This will generate a comment or two.


No doubt!

Can't argue with any of the reasons. But, as for me, I like RAW simply because I like to play with PP - brings out my creative urges.

Reply
 
 
Sep 30, 2017 06:04:18   #
Tracy B. Loc: Indiana
 
Good points, however I will still shoot raw.

Reply
Sep 30, 2017 07:42:10   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Hank Radt wrote:
No doubt!

Can't argue with any of the reasons. But, as for me, I like RAW simply because I like to play with PP - brings out my creative urges.



Reply
Sep 30, 2017 07:42:23   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Tracy B. wrote:
Good points, however I will still shoot raw.



Reply
Sep 30, 2017 10:30:44   #
rmorrison1116 Loc: Near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
 
It's a silly argument. There are times when shooting JPG is advantageous and there are times when shooting RAW is the way to go. More often than not, I have the camera set to record both.

Reply
 
 
Sep 30, 2017 10:32:15   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
rmorrison1116 wrote:
It's a silly argument. There are times when shooting JPG is advantageous and there are times when shooting RAW is the way to go. More often than not, I have the camera set to record both.


It's actually not tailored as an argument at all, just giving reasons to shoot JPEGS over raw files.

Reply
Sep 30, 2017 12:24:31   #
olsonsview
 
If you are not shooting tons of images, then why not shoot raw, or better yet: both? When I worked as a pro doing weddings and events: I and most of my colleagues at that time almost always shot JPEGs. It was up to us to know how to craft good images without the use of raw. We watched our histograms carefully. So we knew when a RAW image was the wise choice. Though honestly, I think I shot RAW less than 1% of my images in a year. The added processing speed while working with JPEGs was a blessing when I had to go through almost 2000 images and get them culled down, retouched, and ready for the bride to see in a week or so. I became so much in the habit of shooting JPEGs that I feel more comfortable doing it that way, even though I am completely retired for five years now. So now I usually shoot both at once. I rough edit using the jpegs to save time, then dump the RAWs that are not needed. But when action requires continuous shooting at the fastest rate the camera can muster, JPEGs only all the way!

Reply
Sep 30, 2017 22:27:50   #
ejones0310 Loc: Tulsa, OK
 
"Just as shooting on film disciplines you into trying to get the result you want in camera, so can the knowledge that you don’t have a Raw file to fall back on when shooting a JPEG."

That sounds like a reason to shoot RAW.

Reply
Oct 1, 2017 04:41:03   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
ejones0310 wrote:
"Just as shooting on film disciplines you into trying to get the result you want in camera, so can the knowledge that you don’t have a Raw file to fall back on when shooting a JPEG."

That sounds like a reason to shoot RAW.


I don't know that's not what I got out of it, sounds like it's more reason to learn to get it in camera as best as possible.

Reply
 
 
Oct 1, 2017 06:44:42   #
WessoJPEG Loc: Cincinnati, Ohio
 
olsonsview wrote:
If you are not shooting tons of images, then why not shoot raw, or better yet: both? When I worked as a pro doing weddings and events: I and most of my colleagues at that time almost always shot JPEGs. It was up to us to know how to craft good images without the use of raw. We watched our histograms carefully. So we knew when a RAW image was the wise choice. Though honestly, I think I shot RAW less than 1% of my images in a year. The added processing speed while working with JPEGs was a blessing when I had to go through almost 2000 images and get them culled down, retouched, and ready for the bride to see in a week or so. I became so much in the habit of shooting JPEGs that I feel more comfortable doing it that way, even though I am completely retired for five years now. So now I usually shoot both at once. I rough edit using the jpegs to save time, then dump the RAWs that are not needed. But when action requires continuous shooting at the fastest rate the camera can muster, JPEGs only all the way!
If you are not shooting tons of images, then why n... (show quote)



Reply
Oct 1, 2017 06:45:37   #
WessoJPEG Loc: Cincinnati, Ohio
 
Racmanaz wrote:
I don't know that's not what I got out of it, sounds like it's more reason to learn to get it in camera as best as possible.



Reply
Oct 1, 2017 07:46:27   #
d2b2 Loc: Catonsville, Maryland, USA
 
Traditionally, I use RAW form most applications. But when doing more casual shooting at parties and such, or for sports photography when faster shooting is required, I will switch. Just like chancing from Manual to Shutter or Aperture priority, it is a choice based on the appropriate need.

Reply
Oct 1, 2017 11:26:54   #
bikertut Loc: Kingsville, MO
 
d2b2 wrote:
Traditionally, I use RAW form most applications. But when doing more casual shooting at parties and such, or for sports photography when faster shooting is required, I will switch. Just like chancing from Manual to Shutter or Aperture priority, it is a choice based on the appropriate need.



Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Links and Resources
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.