rmorrison1116 wrote:
The article says a $80,000 camera vs a $3000 camera, not a $1600 camera with $1400 in accessories. It is still a $1600 camera, not a $3000 camera. The camera body and the 18-135 lens and a memory card should have cost no more than $1600. He may have bought peripheral accessories for the camera at the same time he bought the camera but they don't count towards the value of the camera. That is like me saying I bought a truck for $50,000 then I had a $500 trailer hitch installed and I got a $14,500 trailer to attach to the hitch. I have a $65,000 truck. No, the truck cost $50,000, the truck, hitch and trailer cost $65,000.
Why would anyone realistically compare a high end professional video camera to a prosumer DSLR anyway?!
The article says a $80,000 camera vs a $3000 camer... (
show quote)
That doesn’t excuse this senseless, ridiculous fake “comparison”. Who cares?