Fred & Glenda
Sep 18, 2017 09:07:08 #
Sep 18, 2017 12:04:59 #
SATS
Loc: Belgium
Well, I like it John but - performers - I just have a feeling you are setting yourself up for some negatives ;-/ (wry frown)
Sep 18, 2017 12:47:37 #
SATS wrote:
Well, I like it John but - performers - I just have a feeling you are setting yourself up for some negatives ;-/ (wry frown)
Maybe--thanks for looking.
Sep 18, 2017 12:48:55 #
Sep 18, 2017 16:35:31 #
SATS wrote:
Well, I like it John but - performers - I just have a feeling you are setting yourself up for some negatives ;-/ (wry frown)
Nice people picture. But it is a "staged" performance and not really Street Photography.
Sep 18, 2017 20:08:26 #
Apaflo wrote:
Nice people picture. But it is a "staged" performance and not really Street Photography.
I disagree because they really weren't on a stage at all. Rather, they were playing at the back of a flea market at a street fair with a sign that had their name on it and weren't being paid--they were just entertaining the customers rather than putting on a show.
Sep 18, 2017 21:01:55 #
jaymatt wrote:
I disagree because they really weren't on a stage at all. Rather, they were playing at the back of a flea market at a street fair with a sign that had their name on it and weren't being paid--they were just entertaining the customers rather than putting on a show.
A physical stage has nothing to do with it being "staged"
That is a staged performance by defintion. It entirely lacks any association with candid. It has no relation at all to Street Photography, other than the intersting comparision it provides as an example.
Sep 19, 2017 00:23:16 #
Apaflo wrote:
A physical stage has nothing to do with it being "staged"
That is a staged performance by defintion. It entirely lacks any association with candid. It has no relation at all to Street Photography, other than the intersting comparision it provides as an example.
That is a staged performance by defintion. It entirely lacks any association with candid. It has no relation at all to Street Photography, other than the intersting comparision it provides as an example.
Whatever. To me, it's more street than that truck sitting in a field.
Sep 19, 2017 01:08:57 #
jaymatt wrote:
Whatever. To me, it's more street than that truck sitting in a field.
To you? The world is not Alice in Wonderland where each word means whatever you choose it to mean.
Insisting on obtuse word meanings, repeating the same justifications based on false statements about other images, and continuing to intentionally post inapropriate images is the very definition of trying to bully other members of this section. That is all the more true when you are also posting absolutely false and dishonest statememts about this section in other sections.
You claimed to have been banned here. One further provovation might lead to exactly that.
Sep 19, 2017 01:10:18 #
Apaflo wrote:
To you? The world is not Alice in Wonderland wher... (show quote)
I have no idea what you are referring to. As I said, whatever.
Sep 19, 2017 07:54:04 #
Sep 19, 2017 08:04:44 #
Sep 19, 2017 08:06:04 #
rlaugh wrote:
A fine candid B&W...good job!!
Candid? They are posing! Virtually nobody accepts such shots as Street Photograpy, other than the undefined "by MY definition" folks who have no definition.
Sep 19, 2017 08:09:02 #
Sep 19, 2017 08:15:03 #
dek wrote:
nice Photo
Do I see a new section 'candid B&W' maybe ?
Do I see a new section 'candid B&W' maybe ?
Hope not--there seem to be enough sections as it is.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.