wilderness wrote:
As some of you may know from seeing my gallery posts I take pictures of remote wilderness. Backpacks upwards to 33 days often with the use of climbing ropes means heavy loads. That coupled with the need to travel distances and keep up with my partners means I rarely carry a tripod ( the slot canyon Buckskin Gulch being one of the few exceptions). When I switched to digital ( had been shooting with a mamiya 7 with 80mm lens) I got a Nikon D 750 with the 24-120Vibration controlled lens so that I would only carry one lens for both weight reasons and not wanting to open my camera in dusty/sandy conditions- I often hike in Utah. I however do take fairly close up shots of mud often ( you can see my work at harveyhalpern.com). While not really macro I think I'd benefit from a macro lens. Which one? The Nikon 105 seems too massive. The Tamron 90 vibration controlled lens is only slightly lighter. Tempted by the Tamron non vibration controlled lens as it's quite a bit lighter and many websites seem to say that vibration control doesn't really work at macro ( which I rarely would be shooting that close). Any experience/suggestions from my fellow UHHers.
Thank you in advance.
As some of you may know from seeing my gallery pos... (
show quote)
Of course, it's easy to spend OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY ...
I cannot tell how close you actually want to get to your subject OR the subsequent, relative magnification ...
I think that for many people (or, perhaps just myself!?!) the ability to focus a little closer than the normal range is all that is wanted ...
FWIW. One thing I determined when I was doing some testing several decades ago using CLOSE UP lenses on a fixed lens TLR is that you can get
remarkably good results (I wanted to see if the slightly larger film format was worth the effort before I ponied up for something like a Mamiya TLR-or-SLR or a Hasselblad (!)) ...
Finally, a few months ago, armed with THAT knowledge that you can achieve excellent results (the underlying lens is the limitation) and trying to figure out what to do with the rather
plebeian 14-42 "kit" lens designed for a Panasonic m4/3 camera I finally decided to pony up the meager amount (<$15 via an eBay vendor) for a set of CLOSE UP lenses ...
The main thing which I wanted to test was whether or not the auto-focus would still function ...
Allowing for the limited depth of field which a close up pic will generally have, it does based on the quickie test pics I made ..
Here are a couple of hand held,
cropped by ~50% & re-sampled to 800x600, test pics of a "purple aster" taken with the +10 Diopter lens on the 14mm-42mm lens
set at 42mm ... I think that the particular lens can actually perform a little better, but I haven't tried since I simply wanted to see if the lens could auto-focus, or not, with a close up lens attached ...
Obviously, a lens with some aperture control (
I have never bothered to figure out if the particular lens has any user control beyond zooming) can have a greater depth of field ...
Obviously, a tripod would probably help, too!