Kmgw9v wrote:
I have never broken a camera; I have never learned (and never will) more than my camera is capable of.
So, I am stuck with an outdated, crappy camera?
You're looking at it backward.
1) If your camera is crappy, get a new one.
2) If your camera takes decent pictures, it's not crappy.
3) If there's a feature of new cameras that yours doesn't have, do you need it? Recording a bazillion frames per second isn't useful if you take pictures of flowers, although it might let you take pictures of flowers thrashing in a gale.
4) If there's a feature of new cameras that you'd like to have, can you work around it? If the answer is yes, it's an opportunity to learn and grow as a photographer.
For example, my nine-year old camera won't shoot above ISO 1600, and I really shouldn't go above 400. This causes problems for low-light photos using a hand-held camera. While I would really like a newer camera that can shoot flawless portraits of black cats on moonless nights at 1/1000 of a second, my budget isn't there (yet). Instead, I need to work around the limitations of my equipment. I need to be more creative.
One of the wonderful things about art, in every form it takes, is learning to express yourself within the constraints imposed by your chosen media. You need to have enough camera for your needs. Most new features on cameras are bells and whistles. Personally, I don't care if my camera shoots video or not. Video isn't my medium. I could care less about wi-fi in my camera. GPS is kinda cool, but a notebook in my pocket records my location and in better detail.
What is critical for you and your photographic goals? Can your camera do it? If your camera can, then you don't -need- to upgrade. You can upgrade if you want, but it's a choice at that point.