Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
B&H to pay $3.2 million to settle law suit
Page <prev 2 of 13 next> last>>
Aug 18, 2017 07:02:40   #
paulrph1 Loc: Washington, Utah
 
Jim Bob wrote:
Oh Oh. Now you have gone and done it. Get ready for those B&H worshipers to descend like the Neo Nazis and white supremacists descended on Charlotteseville.


I thought it was the BLM and the Commies that had descended on Charlotteseville. My bad or is it.

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 07:07:18   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
tdekany wrote:
The U.S. Department of Labor has announced that the giant NYC-based photography retailer B&H has agreed to pay $3.22 million to resolve a lawsuit filed by the agency back in February 2016. B&H had faced allegations of discrimination, bias, and harassment.

The settlement, first reported by The Phoblographer, is a “consent decree” between the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs and B&H Foto & Electronics Corp. that resolves the allegations.

“The decree settles allegations that B&H Foto discriminated against female as well as black and Asian job seekers by hiring only Hispanic men for entry-level positions,” the Labor Department writes. “In addition, there were allegations that Hispanic shipping workers were paid significantly less than comparable workers and denied promotion to higher level positions.

“There were also allegations that Hispanic workers were routinely subjected to harassing conduct and had unequal access to restroom facilities, and the company failed to take corrective action when confronted with employee complaints.”

B&H serves as a federal contractor and the U.S. Government responded to allegations to ensure that taxpayer money is going to a business that treats its employees fairly.

In addition to paying $3,220,000 in back wages and monetary relief to over 1,300 workers involved in the settlement, B&H will also be hiring a workplace consultant to correct employment practices at its current Brooklyn warehouse and future New Jersey warehouse. Managers will also be receiving annual training on harassment prevention and equal opportunity principles.
The U.S. Department of Labor has announced that th... (show quote)


And your point is?

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 07:09:33   #
Jim Bob
 
paulrph1 wrote:
I thought it was the BLM and the Commies that had descended on Charlotteseville. My bad or is it.


Your ignorance and racism.

Reply
 
 
Aug 18, 2017 07:12:52   #
wj cody Loc: springfield illinois
 
henryp wrote:
B&H Agrees to Settle Outstanding Government Claims: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/bh-agrees-settle-outstanding-government-claims

B&H settled this matter without admitting guilt and in fact continues to deny any guilt. Why did we settle? To put this matter to rest so we could resume normal business operations. As the matter dragged out, lawyers were the only ones really benefiting.

The OFCCP statement included this, from their Regional Solicitor of Labor Jeffrey S. Rogoff.:
“We are pleased that B&H Foto entered into this agreement, and has committed to ensuring that their workers will receive equitable wages and opportunities, and enjoy a workplace that promotes equal employment opportunity.”
B&H Agrees to Settle Outstanding Government Cl... (show quote)


perhaps, however you would then have no need of a hiring consultant.

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 07:19:30   #
salmander
 
sueyeisert wrote:
While I support labor' I find your comparison offensive and ignorant!


I agree completely. Neo-Nazis and white supremacists are hard-core, life-long, racists. I can't imagine any loyal B&H customers having any kind of rabid loyalty that negates rational thought on that level. Sure, B&H will lose some customers, but I personally feel encouraged by this change of events. Whatever we felt before, we now know for sure that they have an equitable employee policy. We probably make purchases from other favorite companies that we have no idea of their employment practices, but we still buy in gleeful ignorance. Now we actually know that B&H is an improved product, so to speak. It's not going to change my purchasing attitude toward them.

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 07:20:26   #
machia Loc: NJ
 
It was known years ago that workers for B&H filed a lawsuit because they complained that the warehouse that they were working in to ship photo gear " had no windows . " The workers said they were working in sweat-shop like conditions .
I smell a rat .
Lawyers getting rich .
Discrimination on top of that ? That's a slam dunk .
Sounds to me like they bilked B&H out of 3 million by using quotas as their case .
This story sounds all too familiar .
I continue to buy from B&H as I have since 1972 .

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 07:28:33   #
salmander
 
wj cody wrote:
perhaps, however you would then have no need of a hiring consultant.


They need a hiring consultant, because they have been naive about hiring practices and fair treatment in the past, and perhaps a little bit on the stupid side when it comes to the legalities. The hiring consultant as part of the settlement is just to ensure that everything goes smoothly. Perhaps B&H has done its homework and won't need his or her services, but "just in case."

Reply
 
 
Aug 18, 2017 07:37:24   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
tdekany wrote:
The U.S. Department of Labor has announced that the giant NYC-based photography retailer B&H has agreed to pay $3.22 million to resolve a lawsuit filed by the agency back in February 2016. B&H had faced allegations of discrimination, bias, and harassment.

The settlement, first reported by The Phoblographer, is a “consent decree” between the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs and B&H Foto & Electronics Corp. that resolves the allegations.

“The decree settles allegations that B&H Foto discriminated against female as well as black and Asian job seekers by hiring only Hispanic men for entry-level positions,” the Labor Department writes. “In addition, there were allegations that Hispanic shipping workers were paid significantly less than comparable workers and denied promotion to higher level positions.

“There were also allegations that Hispanic workers were routinely subjected to harassing conduct and had unequal access to restroom facilities, and the company failed to take corrective action when confronted with employee complaints.”

B&H serves as a federal contractor and the U.S. Government responded to allegations to ensure that taxpayer money is going to a business that treats its employees fairly.

In addition to paying $3,220,000 in back wages and monetary relief to over 1,300 workers involved in the settlement, B&H will also be hiring a workplace consultant to correct employment practices at its current Brooklyn warehouse and future New Jersey warehouse. Managers will also be receiving annual training on harassment prevention and equal opportunity principles.
The U.S. Department of Labor has announced that th... (show quote)


When ever I worked for a company I did not like for whatever reason I simply put my two week notice in and moved on. In today's workplace that is not the case. Disgruntled workers are every where. If they do not like the working conditions, they contact a lawyer.

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 07:38:09   #
Fotomacher Loc: Toronto
 
The allegations, although unproven, serve to remind us that even the best run companies that we all hold in very high esteem can make mistakes. The settlement and agreements to improve labour practices are the proper ways to resolve the matter brought by the US DofL. It is unfortunate that the owners and managers of B&H appear to have violated labour laws and practices, especially given their origins - but more importantly, they may have violated the principles of "derech eretz". We should support their willingness to admit their wrongs and learn how to behave towards others from the negative examples detailed in the allegations. Shabbat Shalom.

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 07:39:32   #
salmander
 
machia wrote:
Lawyers getting rich .


You have to watch out for those money-grubbing lawyers. I worked for a single mother as a carpenter 30 years ago. She got a divorce from her abusive husband and got a $25,000 settlement as her part. The lawyer stretched out the case, and when it was finally over, guess how much his fee was? $25,000. She was left destitute, and when, two years later, it appeared that there was something wrong with his part of the divorce, he wouldn't correct his own mistake, but insisted that she'd have to come up with another $15,000. She had no money and was left with a compromised situation. Scumbag of the highest order. There are some good attorneys, but it seems that you have to look far and wide to find one.

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 07:41:23   #
MsLala Loc: Kingston, NY
 
Jim Bob wrote:
Oh Oh. Now you have gone and done it. Get ready for those B&H worshipers to descend like the Neo Nazis and white supremacists descended on Charlotteseville.


Whether I support B&H is irrelevant, your comment which compares this topic to the actions of this past weekend are irresponsible and illogical. One has nothing to do with the other and to suggest that they do is inappropriate for this post.

Reply
 
 
Aug 18, 2017 07:43:05   #
wj cody Loc: springfield illinois
 
salmander wrote:
They need a hiring consultant, because they have been naive about hiring practices and fair treatment in the past, and perhaps a little bit on the stupid side when it comes to the legalities. The hiring consultant as part of the settlement is just to ensure that everything goes smoothly. Perhaps B&H has done its homework and won't need his or her services, but "just in case."


for a company as large and long lived to be "naive" of anything regarding work equality rules beggars the imagination.

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 07:44:28   #
Jim Bob
 
salmander wrote:
I agree completely. Neo-Nazis and white supremacists are hard-core, life-long, racists. I can't imagine any loyal B&H customers having any kind of rabid loyalty that negates rational thought on that level. Sure, B&H will lose some customers, but I personally feel encouraged by this change of events. Whatever we felt before, we now know for sure that they have an equitable employee policy. We probably make purchases from other favorite companies that we have no idea of their employment practices, but we still buy in gleeful ignorance. Now we actually know that B&H is an improved product, so to speak. It's not going to change my purchasing attitude toward them.
I agree completely. Neo-Nazis and white supremaci... (show quote)


Boy are you guys naive.

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 07:45:25   #
Jim Bob
 
MsLala wrote:
Whether I support B&H is irrelevant, your comment which compares this topic to the actions of this past weekend are irresponsible and illogical. One has nothing to do with the other and to suggest that they do is inappropriate for this post.


Well you know what they say about opinions. I'll give yours the credit it deserves.

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 07:46:41   #
Stan W. Loc: Tampa, Fl
 
rpavich wrote:
You mean "allegations of discrimination" which is different.

In today's sue-happy society, we are butt-hurt over anything we perceive as a slight on us...we sue at the slightest provocation. It doesn't matter whether the charges are true or not, it matters whether B&H wants to go through the time and money to fight it.

Settlement isn't an admission of guilt, it means they felt that it would be cheaper and smarter to pay out than keep fighting.

Thanks big government looking out for us...now the prices of our gear go up for no reason.
You mean "allegations of discrimination"... (show quote)




W Virginia......imagine that.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.