Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Tiffany
May 14, 2017 12:40:48 #
May 14, 2017 14:29:18 #
Jun 11, 2017 03:43:24 #
#1 - yes, hands are a minor issue. exposure on the breasts, just right, but face exposure not in balance. a little dark
#2 - I don't need the breasts. look at that face and lighting on it !
#3 - My fave. all fits.
keep going and sending in.
#2 - I don't need the breasts. look at that face and lighting on it !
#3 - My fave. all fits.
keep going and sending in.
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Jun 12, 2017 00:11:39 #
[quote=dpullum]focuspuller Forgive me! I was the one who got every one on the hands kick!!
Nonsense. A legitimate comment.
Nonsense. A legitimate comment.
Jun 12, 2017 14:25:33 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
I am impressed with the confident lighting, and the creamy skin tones. Very nice.
Jun 12, 2017 15:19:56 #
Appreciate all the comments, critiques. Tiffany especially thanks everyone for kind words. Unfortunately, due to issue with Terms of Use, I cannot post more photos. I wish I had read the Terms of Use before I posted anything, actually.
Jun 12, 2017 15:23:58 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
focuspuller wrote:
Appreciate all the comments, critiques. Tiffany especially thanks everyone for kind words. Unfortunately, due to issue with Terms of Use, I cannot post more photos. I wish I had read the Terms of Use before I posted anything, actually.
what's the issue with TOU? Are you talking about TOU and ugly hedgehog? Or your agreement with the beautiful model?
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Jun 12, 2017 15:34:47 #
I really like thsee pix, and prefer #3. A minor detail on #3: moving her face 1/2 inch further to camera left would eliminate that dark triangle under her chin, and possibly the dark shadow beneath her chin (light reflected from the wall). This would make a clean profile and remove some irrelevant complexity. IMHO
Thanks to you both for your great work. Love to see more Tiffany!
Thanks to you both for your great work. Love to see more Tiffany!
Jun 12, 2017 16:45:45 #
dat2ra wrote:
I really like thsee pix, and prefer #3. A minor detail on #3: moving her face 1/2 inch further to camera left would eliminate that dark triangle under her chin, and possibly the dark shadow beneath her chin (light reflected from the wall). This would make a clean profile and remove some irrelevant complexity. IMHO
Thanks to you both for your great work. Love to see more Tiffany!
Thanks to you both for your great work. Love to see more Tiffany!
Oh trust me, I wish I could reshoot EVERY pic. Thanks for the comment.
Jun 12, 2017 16:47:16 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
what's the issue with TOU? Are you talking about TOU and ugly hedgehog? Or your agreement with the beautiful model?
The website TOU concerning submissions.
Jun 12, 2017 17:04:00 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
focuspuller wrote:
The website TOU concerning submissions.
presumably the following overly broad clause, which appears to be a writes grab as to photos submitted:
SUBMISSIONS
Visitor agrees as a condition of viewing, that any communication between Visitor and Website is deemed a submission. By making a submission, Visitor grants the administration and the owners of the Website a worldwide, non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free, sub-licenseable and transferable license to use in any way, reproduce and distribute the submission and prepare derivative works of the submission without further permission. This includes commercial and non-commercial use of all submissions, including portions thereof, graphics contained thereon, or any of the content of the submission. Visitor agrees to only communicate that information to the Website, which it wishes to forever allow the Website to use in any manner as it sees fit. "Submissions" is also a provision of the Privacy Policy.
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Jun 12, 2017 17:17:34 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
presumably the following overly broad clause, whic... (show quote)
That and the website's practice of stripping ownership metadata from the thumbnails, though not the downloaded files.
Jun 12, 2017 18:02:25 #
Yes, I just saw this today. Not reasonable. I pay some of my models, so why would I give away my photos (except to model)?
Jun 13, 2017 17:12:48 #
Jun 18, 2017 14:06:15 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.