Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Question about portriat lens.
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Oct 23, 2011 19:51:04   #
Dyluck4 Loc: Georgetown Indiana
 
bobmielke wrote:
Recently Scott Kelby's "The Grid" discussed the topic "Why photographers don't improve". During that discussion a top 10 photographer, grossing over $2 million a year gave a tip to stay away from the 50mm for close-up portraits. He's gracious to share that tip with the discussion.

Episode 25 - http://kelbytv.com/thegrid/

Scott pointed out the reason photographers don't grow in their skill is all the arguments trying to justify their use of the 50mm. Stubbornness prohibits them from moving forward. The 50mm has built-in barrel distortion that is NOT flattering to faces in CLOSE-UP portraits.

I don't know about you but I'm going with the top pro's advice. I own a 50mm F/1.4, an 85mm F/3.5 VRII Micro & an 18-200mm F/3.5-5.6 VRII. I'm moving forward.
Recently Scott Kelby's "The Grid" discus... (show quote)


I have several Lenses and I guess I need to be Educated myself in what Lens would be best for Portraits. I've been told my 200 mm 2.8 II is excellent for Portrait but at the same time that my shop better be big enough to use it comfortly with the closes focus range is 9 ft I think. I have the 70-200mm and the 85mm 1.8 but truley all due well but which can you guys suggest.

Reply
Oct 23, 2011 20:02:39   #
bobmielke Loc: Portland, OR
 
lindann wrote:
Boy I am glad your back.

So I have a D5100 it is a dx if I had a 50mm x 1.5 that would = 75mm lens. I hope I am not sounding silly but that is that right?


The 1.5 Ratio is to show the 35mm film equivalent lens. The 50mm DX or FX has inherent barrel distortion at close range to a person's face causing the nose & eyes to bulge out like a fisheye lens. You're better off with 85mm or greater.

Reply
Oct 23, 2011 20:11:18   #
randym77
 
The thing is...with a 50mm lens on a cropped frame camera, you aren't going to get close to a person's face. Unless you want to photograph their nostril hairs. :-) Using it on a cropped frame camera forces you to stay back at distance that gives you a flattering perspective.

Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2011 20:12:26   #
bobmielke Loc: Portland, OR
 
2Old2Pop wrote:
O.K., so now I really need help. What is the difference between a full frame camera and a cropped camera? What is the best use for a 50mm lens?


50mm lenses are great for anything. Close-up portraiture is the one exception. I'll show you a few examples I took with my 50mm.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A...

Exhibit B
Exhibit B...

Reply
Oct 23, 2011 20:15:17   #
bobmielke Loc: Portland, OR
 
randym77 wrote:
The thing is...with a 50mm lens on a cropped frame camera, you aren't going to get close to a person's face. Unless you want to photograph their nostril hairs. :-) Using it on a cropped frame camera forces you to stay back at distance that gives you a flattering perspective.


You can continue to argue or your can Google the 50mm lenses for close up and read report after report on barrel distortion, regardless or DX or FX. I'm through arguing the scientific facts.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/50-comparison/distortion.htm

Reply
Oct 23, 2011 20:25:45   #
randym77
 
I agree that 50mm are not good for closeup portraits. But you won't be using them for closeup portraits on a cropped frame camera. You really can't.

When I Google 50mm lenses, I come up with links like this that recommend 50mm lenses for portraits with cropped frame cameras.

I have a 50mm f/1.4 that I used to use as a portrait lens on my cropped frame camera. Now I use it as a normal lens on my full frame camera. It was great in both roles, and remains one of my favorites.

Reply
Oct 23, 2011 20:25:47   #
lindann
 
bobmielke wrote:
lindann wrote:
Boy I am glad your back.

So I have a D5100 it is a dx if I had a 50mm x 1.5 that would = 75mm lens. I hope I am not sounding silly but that is that right?


The 1.5 Ratio is to show the 35mm film equivalent lens. The 50mm DX or FX has inherent barrel distortion at close range to a person's face causing the nose & eyes to bulge out like a fisheye lens. You're better off with 85mm or greater.


This is why I am here to learn so I guess it will be 85mm for me. When I can afford it. :)

Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2011 20:26:58   #
blueeyes3515 Loc: WV
 
bobmielke wrote:
bwm55 wrote:
I see a lot of recommendations about using 80 mm lens for portriats. I have an 18-200mm nikor lens. If I set it at approx 80 mm would it be the same as using a 80 mm lens? Could I expect the same results? Thanks...


In film days the classic head & shoulders portrait lens was a 90mm. I was a professional wedding & portrait photographer. With a DX sensor DSLR an 80mm-85mm lens is perfect as a close-up portrait lens. The worse close-up portrait lens is a 50mm because of its inherent barrel distortion that is not flattering to the human face.



I have all three, a 50mm F/1.4, 85mm F/3.5 VRII Micro and an 18-200mm F/3.5-5.6 VRII. I use my zoom for everything, including close-up portraits. The speed of the glass is not as important as some would tell you. You have to really know what you're doing to shoot at wide open apertures. Few do. Use your 18-200mm at whatever focal length pleases you and the subject.
quote=bwm55 I see a lot of recommendations about ... (show quote)


:-P good to see you back!!

Reply
Oct 23, 2011 21:03:01   #
HungryEye
 
Any thing over 80mm.

I have been experimenting lately by using an 85mm wide open and then turn my lens focus during rapid fire to get the depth of focus. I then put them all into PhotoShop (different layers) and use the eraser to erase the portions of the soft areas for the sharp areas to come through on the other layers. It looks cool! and sort of surreal. Super close ( Head fills frame) and low light.

Subject has to stay still. Try it!

Reply
Oct 24, 2011 07:38:30   #
PhotogJoe Loc: Miami, Florida
 
I shoot with a Nikon D3S and my portrait lens is the 85mm f/1.4 G , I get beautiful bokeh with that lens.

Reply
Oct 25, 2011 00:52:37   #
HungryEye
 
Right on Photo Joe!

Bob you're right..Heck i've done portraits with a 28mm! Don't do it regularly. It all depends on what you want the Backround to do and how much barrel distortion you can correct for in the shooting and in post. I love the shallow focus in a 50mm for portraits as well as crisp and flat telles. Nice shots of the little critters!

Reply
 
 
Oct 25, 2011 05:12:32   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
Let us not forget that for people with small noses it is best to use a short lens. Foreshortening will make it grow!
For a Math treatment see:
http://www.aussievideosearch.com/lens.htm

For an example of this distortion a relitively size .. the tail of two bottles. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perspective_distortion_%28photography%29

AND I would not and could not kiss the 24mm girl cause of that long nose, but could kiss the gal with the 70mm lens. The photographer took a chaw of bacca, spit brown juice, shuffled her feet in the dirt and said "Heck i've done portraits with a 28mm!" (same they used for President Nixon, Bob Hope, and Pinocchio)
http://www.mcpactions.com/blog/2010/07/21/the-ideal-focal-length-for-portraiture-a-photographers-experiment/

I knows you knew that, but the last reference has photos of a girl where as the first two are tilted toward the technical Geometry/Math view.

Scientific Facts are Boring compared to hotly defended opinions based on the empirical observation. But, I will agree empericalvations are much more fun discussed over a cup of coffee. (lol)

Don d/p

Reply
Oct 25, 2011 06:15:40   #
randym77
 
Yes, I think what that pro was talking about was technically not barrel distortion, but perspective distortion (as in Don's Wikipedia link). Perspective distortion is just a function of how far the lens is from the subject (as the link says), not a quality of the lens itself. So a 50mm lens on a cropped frame camera is roughly equivalent to an 80mm lens on a full-frame, because you'll be standing about the same distance from your subject.

Reply
Oct 25, 2011 06:48:03   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
Yes, RandyM77, agreed, I think part of the forum agreement should be to refer to the effective mm of a lens. (joking, but not joking) I should go thru with an Aluminum Sharpie and remark all my lenses.

As you referred, "When I Google 50mm lenses, I come up with links like this that recommend 50mm lenses for portraits with cropped frame cameras." Of Course, it is not 50mm lens, rather, it is a 75mm for a crop sensor. AND for portraits, a 75mm is a good choice. To the Newbies, surly these mis-valued lens focal lengths suggestions for a particular use, in this case portraits, are confusing.

Again sorry to say, choice for an accurately representative portrait, is not a thing of opinion, rather it is a mathematically defined geometric, scientific, boring to most, statement of scientific fact.

Reply
Oct 25, 2011 08:04:01   #
randym77
 
Yes, it is confusing. A lot of newbies don't even know they have cropped frame cameras. When I was a newb, I knew I had a cropped frame camera, but didn't really understand what it meant when it came to focal length. A lot of books and even web sites have material that's recycled from the days of film. The authors are often old pros who went directly from film to full-frame digital, so they tend to brush over the cropped frame issue.

One tip that helped me was to try the focal length with a zoom lens (assuming you have one, which most people do these days). I was considering an 85mm lens for portraits, and someone suggested I try setting my zoom lens at 85mm and see if the length suited me. I found it didn't. It was too long on my cropped frame camera. I couldn't back up enough to take the kind of candid, indoor portraits I wanted to take. Might be different outdoors or if I had a bigger house ;-).

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.