Delderby Loc: Derby UK

It is the title of the post that is misleading. The facts of the matter are to do with percentage increase/decreases. As you rightly point out, they cannot be used for comparing numbers. It is possible (probable) that, as one goes down in number, the other will go up by a similar number.
As a MFT fan, it would be interesting to read the statistics comparing MFT with DSLR, mirrorless or otherwise. As DSLR lenses wear out, I would expect that MFT numbers will snowball.

Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga

Is that mirrorless number MILC only or does it include point & shoot numbers ? Percentages do not tell enough of the story...

Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga

I own a couple of MFT Oly's as well as several Nikon DSLR's. Some of my lenses are almost as old as me. They haven't worn out. Granted, many are not AF, but they still function, unlike many newer lenses that are electronically controlled.

markjay

It doesnt matter what the numerical breakdown is.
The trend is unstoppable.

There will always be people using a DSLR - just as there are still people using film.
There are also people that are obsessed with dinosaurs as well.

Leitz Loc: Solms

Aside from interchangeable lens, is there a difference?

RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA

In use, very little.

Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga

I wonder then if it includes the cameras in smartphones... ?

Leitz Loc: Solms

What with auxiliary lenses available for phones, the differences do seem to be dwindling.

Anandnra Loc: Tennessee

Percentages CAN be misleading ....say for example ...... DSLR numbers went down from 100,000 to 89,000 and Mirrorless went up from 100 to 190 ..... in the comparable period. Just saying ....

markjay

it doesnt matter.
The trend is unstoppable.
Within 2-3 years the sales of dslrs will be a fraction of mirrorless.

Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga

Here is a link to the report & it doesn't give a very concise breakdown... http://www.cipa.jp/stats/documents/e/d-201704_e.pdf

waegwan Loc: Mae Won Li

Hmmm other than some bulk, isn't a DSLR basically mirrorless when on live view? Just a thought.

camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.

It is impossible to deny the fact of how convenient and capable mirrorless cameras are. It is also impossible to deny that technology in those cameras is superior to the technology packed in dSLR.
AF has been improved and I am sure very soon it will be at a par with those in dSLR cameras. The assortment of lenses today is better than ever.
As has been said, quality wise there is nothing wrong with dSLR cameras. It is the convenience, light weight, size and features in mirrorless cameras that have made them a favorite the world over.
Nikon and Canon did not do enough research and development in the mirrorless field or so it seems and both companies are now far behind. Olympus and Panasonic went into a joint venture by which lenses from one company can be used with the bodies of the other. That to me is genius.
I share the opinion of others that some day most cameras will be mirrorless and as a matter of fact I predicted about three years ago that such thing will eventually happen.
I have been using Olympus bodies with some lenses made by Panasonic and I have been delighted by the size of cameras and lenses and the quality of my photographs. Experience one of these cameras for street photography and I guarantee that you will not look back.
Many professionals are now mirrorless camera shooters.

billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont

And your point is? Your statement is very misleading. Mirrorless is the new THING on the market. What that study does not take into account is USE AMONG PROFESSIONALS and the fact that some folks who have had DSLR's and bought mirrorless are going BACK to DSLR's. I shoot BIF, for me Mirrorless does not have the lenses that DSLR'S offer for BIF. That said I own two mirrorless, I use them in difficult lighting conditions because with mirrorless I can see what the final shot will look like before I shoot. I very big advantage. Same with exposure compensation, the mirrorless applies the effect and I can see what it does to the image BEFORE I shoot. But for sports, Mirrorless has a LONG way to go. The rest of the story has now been told.

dkguill Loc: Elkhart, IN

Not surprised...new gets attention. I own a Sony NEX7 and almost never use it. I just hate the view finder. I also own 5D4, 5Ds, & 7D2...use them when getting good pics is important...which is whenever I take a pic. The NEX7 is smaller and lighter, but it doesn't replace my DSLRs and never will. Just personal preference I suppose.