Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Sigma or Tamron?
Jun 23, 2012 11:57:12 #
I was wondering what your thoughts are on a Sigma or Tamron 17-55 mm f/2.8 lens would be, what is the best of the two. I have a kit lens but I want a lower F stop also.
Thanks
Thanks
Jun 24, 2012 00:16:57 #
cherylpeters wrote:
I was wondering what your thoughts are on a Sigma or Tamron 17-55 mm f/2.8 lens would be, what is the best of the two. I have a kit lens but I want a lower F stop also.
Thanks
Thanks
You might check dpreview.com
I have a Sigma 150-500 and find it awesome. I have read mixed reviews on Tamron.
My next lens is a wide angle. I'd like the Tokina but so far it doesn't have focusing motors in the lens which is what I need. I'm waiting.
Jun 24, 2012 01:02:30 #
cherylpeters wrote:
I was wondering what your thoughts are on a Sigma or Tamron 17-55 mm f/2.8 lens would be, what is the best of the two. I have a kit lens but I want a lower F stop also.
Thanks
Thanks
My experience with both brands is that they made some great lenses and some dogs. I went back three times before I got a Tamron 28-300 I was satisfied with. A friend had the same experience with a Sigma 100-400. BUT this was years ago. I would like to believe that both companies have survived in today's market because they improved both manufacturing consistency and quality control. Right now I don't know which I'd get, but based on the feedback from people on this forum, I'd probably try the Sigma first. I would also try to find a dealer who would be willing to a trade or two or three if you are unhappy with a particular lens.
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Jun 24, 2012 01:10:00 #
Might depend on your camera. If Sony (and others) that have image stabilization in the camera, you woud not need that built into the lens. I have two lens from each. It seems that Sigma is more durable. I do not have any complaints about these lenses, however they are not the lenses you asking about.
Jun 24, 2012 05:17:56 #
Jun 24, 2012 07:47:44 #
I have a Nikon D3000 and there is no motor in lense. I have been comparing the Sigma 17-55 2.8 with the Tamron 17-55 2.8. I see the Tamron was more expensive.just wondering why. Thanks for your reply's.
Jun 24, 2012 08:52:49 #
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Jun 24, 2012 09:54:37 #
I love my Tamron 18-270. Working with no problem with Nikon D5100
Photo was taken from hotel 15th floor.
Jun 24, 2012 10:16:31 #
i just bought a sima 30mm 1.4 and it is awesome.
a short time ago i bought a sigma 70-200mm2.8 with OS and it is so awesome.
i also have a canon 24-70mm2.8 L lens so i have high quality to compare sigma to.
i have a friend that has the tamron 24-70 with VC and it is an awesome lens.
i wouldn't be afraid of either brand. just buy them from a dealer that gives you 30 days to return if you don't like it.
a short time ago i bought a sigma 70-200mm2.8 with OS and it is so awesome.
i also have a canon 24-70mm2.8 L lens so i have high quality to compare sigma to.
i have a friend that has the tamron 24-70 with VC and it is an awesome lens.
i wouldn't be afraid of either brand. just buy them from a dealer that gives you 30 days to return if you don't like it.
Jun 24, 2012 10:24:03 #
I also have the a Tamron 17-50 2.8 non VC on a Nikon D7000 and can't recommend it enough.
Jun 24, 2012 12:07:37 #
I shoot with a Nikon D80 and Nikon D300s. I have a Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 that takes great pictures. it works well in low light. I have 2 kids that both ice skate and the lighting is always tough but the sigma is well capable of sharp pictues at the rink. I also have a Tamron 28-75mm 2.8 that takes great all around pictures and is always on my D300s. I hope this helps.
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Jun 24, 2012 12:21:38 #
This might help.
Lens Reviews
http://kenrockwell.com
http://photozone.de/
http://dpreview.com
Info:
http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html
Lens Reviews
http://kenrockwell.com
http://photozone.de/
http://dpreview.com
Info:
http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html
Jun 24, 2012 12:49:31 #
I have been using the Tamron Aspherical, LD, XR, DiII, SP,
17-50mm 1:2.8 and the Tamron Asperical, XR, DiII, LD (IF)
28-75mm 1:2.8mm Macro lenses for about a year. They provide very good image quality in low light at a very affordable price. Here is a very good review link! You may have to copy and paste. I am a strong believer in this lens and would purchase another with few questions asked. http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Tamron-17-50mm-f-2.8-XR-Di-II-Lens-Review.aspx
17-50mm 1:2.8 and the Tamron Asperical, XR, DiII, LD (IF)
28-75mm 1:2.8mm Macro lenses for about a year. They provide very good image quality in low light at a very affordable price. Here is a very good review link! You may have to copy and paste. I am a strong believer in this lens and would purchase another with few questions asked. http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Tamron-17-50mm-f-2.8-XR-Di-II-Lens-Review.aspx
Jun 24, 2012 13:06:26 #
I just got the Tamron 17-55 for my Pentax k-5 at $378.00 on ebay. The comparable one in Pentax is $1000.00 locally at the burn out camera store. I find it excellent. Sharp, clean, relatively noise free. I can't speak for the Sigma. I have a 55-200 sigma zoom which leaves something to be desired.
Jun 24, 2012 15:37:37 #
Thanks, for the info. It will be helpful. I have been taking pic's for three years now. I get alot of it. I just was questioning these two lenses.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.