orrie smith wrote:
Has anyone purchased and used the new Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 E version lens. Is it worth the extra 700-800 dollar investment over the 70-200 f/2.8G lens? I will primarily use it for sports and other action photography and am having a problem justifying the extra cost for the E version of this lens, as the reviews for the older (and cheaper) version of this lens are great and I cannot find that much difference between the two.
It's not worth it for me, but...
Some comparison sites.