Discuss: Everypixel
Apr 9, 2017 00:08:34 #
Linda From Maine wrote:
That was fun 
Yours is a stunningly beautiful image.
Apr 9, 2017 04:54:52 #
.
Apr 9, 2017 05:03:50 #
It seems to like abstracts, though 
. (This is my edit of one of Minniev's shots). Maybe it's more a fan of Salvador Dali rather than Ansel Adams....
-
. (This is my edit of one of Minniev's shots). Maybe it's more a fan of Salvador Dali rather than Ansel Adams....-
Apr 9, 2017 06:47:00 #
They way it grades images makes me wonder whose right, us or the algorithm. S-
Apr 9, 2017 07:02:37 #
St3v3M wrote:
They way it grades images makes me wonder whose right, us or the algorithm. S-
It's purpose is to assess an image's suitability as a stock photo. Bearing in mind that the internet is already awash with certain types of images, it's probably designed to favour shots that are refreshingly different. Because of that, it possibly goes against a shot if it's classified as an "autumn" image or a landscape shot with nothing distinctive about it (and so on).
Apr 9, 2017 07:11:47 #
R.G. wrote:
It's purpose is to assess an image's suitability as a stock photo. Bearing in mind that the internet is already awash with certain types of images, it's probably designed to favour shots that are refreshingly different. Because of that, it possibly goes against a shot if it's classified as an "autumn" image or a landscape shot with nothing distinctive about it (and so on).
I like you and think we'll keep you! Laf
Apr 9, 2017 07:17:27 #
St3v3M wrote:
I like you and think we'll keep you! Laf
Even if The Software says otherwise?
Apr 9, 2017 07:46:56 #
R.G. wrote:
Even if The Software says otherwise?
Software smoftware, we're family here! S-
Apr 9, 2017 08:49:01 #
reading the suggested tags, i get the idea it is a simple minded shape matcher.
Concentric circles = tire, more of them = vehicle, green = land, blue = water,
raggedy horizon = mountain, autumn colors= fall landscape, face = people, fan shape =tree,
All fuzzy = abstract, etc, etc
Then it assigns a value based on how often current images of that type are being viewed on facebook, google...
Concentric circles = tire, more of them = vehicle, green = land, blue = water,
raggedy horizon = mountain, autumn colors= fall landscape, face = people, fan shape =tree,
All fuzzy = abstract, etc, etc
Then it assigns a value based on how often current images of that type are being viewed on facebook, google...
Apr 9, 2017 09:06:54 #
Apr 9, 2017 09:56:30 #
Could there also be a factor of uniqueness built into the algorithm? It would make sense, if for stock, that higher ratings might be given to images for which there are not so many other similar shots already banked in the stock systems?
Apr 9, 2017 10:42:43 #
minniev wrote:
Could there also be a factor of uniqueness built into the algorithm? It would make sense, if for stock, that higher ratings might be given to images for which there are not so many other similar shots already banked in the stock systems?
It's quite easily confused... it tagged a British BSA 500 Rocket motorcycle as a Harley Davidson... that's quite insulting to me
Apr 9, 2017 10:50:49 #
Graham Smith wrote:
It's quite easily confused... it tagged a British BSA 500 Rocket motorcycle as a Harley Davidson... that's quite insulting to me
And even more insulting to those of us who ride Harley's.
Good riding to you,
Dennis
Apr 9, 2017 11:47:38 #
Graham Smith wrote:
It's quite easily confused... it tagged a British BSA 500 Rocket motorcycle as a Harley Davidson... that's quite insulting to me
Some of the tags it suggests are hilarious.
Apr 9, 2017 12:22:20 #
minniev wrote:
Some of the tags it suggests are hilarious.
It's been a welcome distraction for me
I think, in future, I will only post images that Everypixel scores at 100%
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.