Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
The perfect camera
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Mar 23, 2017 12:10:15   #
photon38
 
Isn't it obvious, the perfect camera would only have one button, labeled N T I B.
It would automatically make up for all my ignorance and produce fully photo shopped pictures everyone, from the greenest beginner to the most experienced and cynical professional exclaim: Now That Is Beautiful.
Well, you did ask😂😂

Reply
Mar 23, 2017 12:19:11   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado
 
My perfect camera is the one I'm holding in my hands.

Reply
Mar 23, 2017 12:21:52   #
MarkSki
 
Sounds like the Olympus PEN.

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2017 13:34:49   #
canon Lee
 
TREBORB wrote:
What would our members consider to be the perfect camera in the smaller frame size, eg cross breed a Canon 6Ts and a 7d mark ii.?
What would you add to that design to make you happy enough that you will not be a sucker to buy every update in design.
Would it satisy us if this ideal camera could make a Capuccino on demand. We can add our own Sugar to taste.
I say this to some degree in jest. We always never seemed satisfied. Of course even if it could be defined, no Camera maker would want to build it. They live of our human frailty, We must have the next best. THe standard of cameras today are amazing. That the Camera makers can pack so much in a small frame, is amazing and to do it with a reasonable reliability. So if you can't wait to get rid of todays version for tomorrows do it all, let me know. I have a few spare dollar bills . I dont need an ASA of 20,00 or an aperture of .05, or even a shutter speed from 1 hr to 100/000th of a second. So long the camera is available in Sky blue pink with Chartreuse contrast.
Tomorrow will always be better than today. Enjoy Today
What would our members consider to be the perfect ... (show quote)


Frankly its not the camera, but the photographer that makes creative good shots. But I would love if they added to the 7D WiFi, to export to a large iPAD. I use CamRanger and control my camera wirelessly, up to 150' away!

Reply
Mar 23, 2017 13:43:05   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
A Fuji full frame mirrorless....

Reply
Mar 23, 2017 15:48:44   #
IBM
 
What a strange thing, this thing called a human is , The talk that goes on here is crazy it really is , there is a lot of products out there that
Nearly every house hold has , and uses every day , and in the long it cost as much as a $10000 camera or more , Yet NO One EVEN TALKS About them . It must be because there so simple to operate , that they don't feel as much pride in conkering the workings of it .maybe
We could change that and bring it to light , we could call it the .?? You figuer that out . It's the coffee brewer , there is more makes of them on the shelves and more outlet's than cameras will ever have , and you never hear a word , in my hay day I drank 8,9,10 , cups a day for
60 years down to two cups a day now, I can see it now , my deluxe zoom boom brewer is better than your , no mess express , I can see it
Getting out of hand , videos of all kinds of pots doing there thing , and testers spotting off on which one is the best , it would be as crazy for coffee pots as it is for Cameras now , and they all only do one thing , take pictures, make coffee, cook waffles, open cans ,catch mice,

Reply
Mar 23, 2017 16:00:19   #
revhen Loc: By the beautiful Hudson
 
So Ansel Adams had the perfect camera for black and white -- and color (look for his fabulous color photos). But, then again, maybe it was the photographer, with his eye, technical skill, and post-processing (then in a darkroom) that produced such perfection. I've seen some fine pictures taken with a rudimentary pinhole camera. As one of the earlier responders indicated, we need to define perfection. One of the most imperfect pictures ever taken was one of the most powerful: Robert Capa's D-Day photo all messed up in development, etc.

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2017 16:00:38   #
revhen Loc: By the beautiful Hudson
 

Reply
Mar 23, 2017 16:16:03   #
dragonfist Loc: Stafford, N.Y.
 
revhen wrote:
So Ansel Adams had the perfect camera for black and white -- and color (look for his fabulous color photos). But, then again, maybe it was the photographer, with his eye, technical skill, and post-processing (then in a darkroom) that produced such perfection. I've seen some fine pictures taken with a rudimentary pinhole camera. As one of the earlier responders indicated, we need to define perfection. One of the most imperfect pictures ever taken was one of the most powerful: Robert Capa's D-Day photo all messed up in development, etc.
So Ansel Adams had the perfect camera for black an... (show quote)


I may be blind to perfection but Ansel Adams work really never aroused my apparent limited sensibilities. I would much rather peruse the work of Henri Cartier Bresson any day in the week. It probably is the fact that I appreciate the subject matter better. I love to study the human condition. What Bresson could do with that Leica was the work of a master. I'm not saying Adams was not a master of his chosen subject matter; it just doesn't appeal to me.

Reply
Mar 23, 2017 16:27:40   #
revhen Loc: By the beautiful Hudson
 
dragonfist wrote:
I may be blind to perfection but Ansel Adams work really never aroused my apparent limited sensibilities. I would much rather peruse the work of Henri Cartier Bresson any day in the week. It probably is the fact that I appreciate the subject matter better. I love to study the human condition. What Bresson could do with that Leica was the work of a master. I'm not saying Adams was not a master of his chosen subject matter; it just doesn't appeal to me.


Difference of perception, taste, interests, and concerns makes the world go round. When it comes to people I'm a fan of Dorothea Lange and Robert Capa.

Reply
Mar 23, 2017 16:46:58   #
IBM
 
dragonfist wrote:
I may be blind to perfection but Ansel Adams work really never aroused my apparent limited sensibilities. I would much rather peruse the work of Henri Cartier Bresson any day in the week. It probably is the fact that I appreciate the subject matter better. I love to study the human condition. What Bresson could do with that Leica was the work of a master. I'm not saying Adams was not a master of his chosen subject matter; it just doesn't appeal to me.


His work is mostly about developing , he was a genues when it came to that , those Desert pic jumped of the page moonlight some thing or other , if any one had his negatives, they still couldn't produce what he did , it was all in the burning and dodging under the enlarger light
He had it all written on paper what and how many seconds on each thing and in what section it was in , and they still could not get it quite like he could , his wife made a living doing his negatives when he died still not as good , but people bought them

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2017 20:30:08   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
IBM wrote:
His work is mostly about developing , he was a genues when it came to that , those Desert pic jumped of the page moonlight some thing or other , if any one had his negatives, they still couldn't produce what he did , it was all in the burning and dodging under the enlarger light
He had it all written on paper what and how many seconds on each thing and in what section it was in , and they still could not get it quite like he could , his wife made a living doing his negatives when he died still not as good , but people bought them
His work is mostly about developing , he was a gen... (show quote)

Moonlight over Hernandez, New Mexico. My fav. Back in the 80s they had a gallery here that carried his signed & numbered prints. They had one for $13,000. Oh how I wished for it.

Reply
Mar 23, 2017 21:12:23   #
10MPlayer Loc: California
 
It would have the light sensitivity of a cat, the dynamic range of the human eye or better, the optics of a bald eagle, weigh less than a smart phone and cost less than a good used car. Eventually the sensitivity and dynamic range issues may be achievable. The other stuff, probably not.

Reply
Mar 24, 2017 17:08:45   #
hassighedgehog Loc: Corona, CA
 
Since every photographer has his or her own standards, the makers will have no problem continuing to sell cameras.

Reply
Mar 24, 2017 17:52:14   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
A Fuji full frame mirrorless....

Ranjan wrote:
Mine has a name: Fujifilm X-E2s


Fuji comes really close!
Love my X-E2.
Would like to have my X100s back as well.
They got the ergonomics and menu set-up right.
The lenses are fantastic.
Fuji is also great about updating firmware.
Now if they could just make flash work as well as my Nikon. Cactus radio tranceivers are getting an update that will accommodate ttl and HSS and be able to intermix brands.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.