Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Post 2 favorite images a day
Page <<first <prev 43 of 66 next> last>>
Jun 16, 2012 11:47:56   #
meo62 Loc: Kingsville Texas
 
love the badlands photo its almost as if you can see the clouds rolling by :D



a scrub jay
a scrub jay...

Reply
Jun 16, 2012 16:57:21   #
dhelix33 Loc: Live in Raleigh, NC - Grew up in Teaneck, NJ
 
Decided to do an image study in processing contrasts today. Went out to the Eastern Nebraska countryside this cloudy morning and captured a series of images. Processed all the images with Adobe Lightroom and Photomatix. However one image was processed with natural tonemapping the other with effect tonemapping. Thoughts?

Shot with my: Nikon D700 FX, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8, Sigma 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Sigma 14-24mm f/4.5-5.6













Reply
Jun 17, 2012 00:09:09   #
JessieNoelPhotography Loc: Oregon
 
:) here is two





Reply
 
 
Jun 17, 2012 07:14:19   #
dhelix33 Loc: Live in Raleigh, NC - Grew up in Teaneck, NJ
 
Hi Jessie -

what equipment do you use? Also, was any post-processing performed on the images you have put up here?

Greg

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
:) here is two

Reply
Jun 17, 2012 07:44:55   #
William Loc: Mississippi
 
long time ago I saw this

and fer dissert it's a commie
and fer dissert it's a commie...

well?
well?...

Reply
Jun 17, 2012 07:47:07   #
William Loc: Mississippi
 
Great Post ... one of the best to let it be

Reply
Jun 17, 2012 10:19:03   #
JessieNoelPhotography Loc: Oregon
 
dhelix33 wrote:
Hi Jessie -

what equipment do you use? Also, was any post-processing performed on the images you have put up here?

Greg

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
:) here is two


I just use a normal Canon EOS Rebel Xsi with a 75-300mm lens. And what exactly do you mean about "post-processing"?

Reply
 
 
Jun 17, 2012 10:26:59   #
dhelix33 Loc: Live in Raleigh, NC - Grew up in Teaneck, NJ
 
In terms of digital imaging software - such as Adobe Photoshop or Adobe Lightroom...

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
dhelix33 wrote:
Hi Jessie -

what equipment do you use? Also, was any post-processing performed on the images you have put up here?

Greg

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
:) here is two


I just use a normal Canon EOS Rebel Xsi with a 75-300mm lens. And what exactly do you mean about "post-processing"?

Reply
Jun 17, 2012 10:28:50   #
JessieNoelPhotography Loc: Oregon
 
dhelix33 wrote:
In terms of digital imaging software - such as Adobe Photoshop or Adobe Lightroom...

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
dhelix33 wrote:
Hi Jessie -

what equipment do you use? Also, was any post-processing performed on the images you have put up here?

Greg

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
:) here is two


I just use a normal Canon EOS Rebel Xsi with a 75-300mm lens. And what exactly do you mean about "post-processing"?


I have Adobe Photoshop Elements 8

Reply
Jun 17, 2012 10:35:35   #
dhelix33 Loc: Live in Raleigh, NC - Grew up in Teaneck, NJ
 
For instance, in the link below you can see a set of images I went out into a cloudy Eastern Nebraska countryside yesterday morning and captured. Processed all the images with Adobe Lightroom and Photomatix. However one image was processed with natural tonemapping the other with effect tonemapping.

I did this to specifically show the glaring difference in tonemapping an image to enhance the natural definition of resolution as opposed to the - at times - garish over processed effects with 'tricked-out' enhancements I have seen people present online. Personally the more natural processing method is my preference - this link was just a simple method to display the general difference between the two. There are some who spend quite a bit of time with HDR processing, and create quite spectacular results (a colleague, Neil Armstrong based in Los Angeles is one).

After opening and cataloging the images in Adobe Lightroom, I do an initial processing effort with Adobe Lightroom exposure modification tools. I then used the Tonemapping "Enhancer" tools in Photomatix 4 software for the natural processed images, and the "Painterly" or "Grunge" tools in Photomatix 4 software for the over processed look.

Shot with my: Nikon D700 FX, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8, Sigma 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Sigma 14-24mm f/4.5-5.6

Cheers!&#8232;
Greg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/73877479@N00/sets/72157630148923376/show/

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
dhelix33 wrote:
Hi Jessie -

what equipment do you use? Also, was any post-processing performed on the images you have put up here?

Greg

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
:) here is two


I just use a normal Canon EOS Rebel Xsi with a 75-300mm lens. And what exactly do you mean about "post-processing"?

Reply
Jun 17, 2012 10:38:34   #
JessieNoelPhotography Loc: Oregon
 
Those are really great :) So was there a particular reason you asked what I used? Just wondering. :)

dhelix33 wrote:
For instance, in the link below you can see a set of images I went out into a cloudy Eastern Nebraska countryside yesterday morning and captured. Processed all the images with Adobe Lightroom and Photomatix. However one image was processed with natural tonemapping the other with effect tonemapping.

I did this to specifically show the glaring difference in tonemapping an image to enhance the natural definition of resolution as opposed to the - at times - garish over processed effects with 'tricked-out' enhancements I have seen people present online. Personally the more natural processing method is my preference - this link was just a simple method to display the general difference between the two. There are some who spend quite a bit of time with HDR processing, and create quite spectacular results (a colleague, Neil Armstrong based in Los Angeles is one).

After opening and cataloging the images in Adobe Lightroom, I do an initial processing effort with Adobe Lightroom exposure modification tools. I then used the Tonemapping "Enhancer" tools in Photomatix 4 software for the natural processed images, and the "Painterly" or "Grunge" tools in Photomatix 4 software for the over processed look.

Shot with my: Nikon D700 FX, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8, Sigma 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Sigma 14-24mm f/4.5-5.6

Cheers!&#8232;
Greg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/73877479@N00/sets/72157630148923376/show/

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
dhelix33 wrote:
Hi Jessie -

what equipment do you use? Also, was any post-processing performed on the images you have put up here?

Greg

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
:) here is two


I just use a normal Canon EOS Rebel Xsi with a 75-300mm lens. And what exactly do you mean about "post-processing"?
For instance, in the link below you can see a set ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jun 17, 2012 11:03:21   #
dhelix33 Loc: Live in Raleigh, NC - Grew up in Teaneck, NJ
 
Jessie -

I was just wondering if the captures you posted were post-processed, and if so what software you used. From your response, it appears that you have not used post-processing digital imaging software tools on your captures.

One of the reasons I started this thread was not just to share pictures, but also to share experiences and knowledge.

Although I exclusively use Nikon equipment, I am not a Canon 'hater' - in fact the Canon EOS Rebel Xsi you own is a quite good entry level DSLR...

Greg

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
Those are really great :) So was there a particular reason you asked what I used? Just wondering. :)

dhelix33 wrote:
For instance, in the link below you can see a set of images I went out into a cloudy Eastern Nebraska countryside yesterday morning and captured. Processed all the images with Adobe Lightroom and Photomatix. However one image was processed with natural tonemapping the other with effect tonemapping.

I did this to specifically show the glaring difference in tonemapping an image to enhance the natural definition of resolution as opposed to the - at times - garish over processed effects with 'tricked-out' enhancements I have seen people present online. Personally the more natural processing method is my preference - this link was just a simple method to display the general difference between the two. There are some who spend quite a bit of time with HDR processing, and create quite spectacular results (a colleague, Neil Armstrong based in Los Angeles is one).

After opening and cataloging the images in Adobe Lightroom, I do an initial processing effort with Adobe Lightroom exposure modification tools. I then used the Tonemapping "Enhancer" tools in Photomatix 4 software for the natural processed images, and the "Painterly" or "Grunge" tools in Photomatix 4 software for the over processed look.

Shot with my: Nikon D700 FX, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8, Sigma 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Sigma 14-24mm f/4.5-5.6

Cheers!&#8232;
Greg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/73877479@N00/sets/72157630148923376/show/

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
dhelix33 wrote:
Hi Jessie -

what equipment do you use? Also, was any post-processing performed on the images you have put up here?

Greg

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
:) here is two


I just use a normal Canon EOS Rebel Xsi with a 75-300mm lens. And what exactly do you mean about "post-processing"?
For instance, in the link below you can see a set ... (show quote)
Those are really great :) So was there a particula... (show quote)

Reply
Jun 17, 2012 11:14:10   #
Blueduck Loc: Maryland
 
LILY MARLENE wrote:
how do i do that? the browse buttons are here now but am i on someone elses page..i will try now. 2 of my favorites..


Those kids are too cute for words, LOVE the dinosaur.

Reply
Jun 17, 2012 11:18:12   #
Blueduck Loc: Maryland
 
dhelix33 wrote:
23 Jan. 2012

dhelix33 wrote:
PLEASE POST TWO OF YOUR FAVORITES EVERY DAY!!

GLD


Wow love both of these,great angle on the bridge, and the flower almost looks like a snowflake.

Reply
Jun 17, 2012 11:58:12   #
meo62 Loc: Kingsville Texas
 
love the deeper blue and seems more vivid color and i think i saw a face in the clouds :D great work
dhelix33 wrote:
Decided to do an image study in processing contrasts today. Went out to the Eastern Nebraska countryside this cloudy morning and captured a series of images. Processed all the images with Adobe Lightroom and Photomatix. However one image was processed with natural tonemapping the other with effect tonemapping. Thoughts?

Shot with my: Nikon D700 FX, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8, Sigma 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Sigma 14-24mm f/4.5-5.6

Reply
Page <<first <prev 43 of 66 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.