Ida Kucera takes AMAZING pictures of dogs.
When asked about her equipment, she said "I use Nikon D700 combined with either a 80-200mm 2,8, 60mm 2,8, 12-24mm 2,8. ( All Nikon ) Elinchrome 250 w x 2 and backdrop ( for studio ) Speedlight SB-900 if I need it when I travel. That's it."
I can find lenses that are 80-200 3.5, but not 2.8. Could she have made a slight error?
Here is her site, which shows super sharp pictures:
http://www.doggystajl.net/portfolio/
I have an AF Nikkor 80-200mm 2.8 ED lens. It is older and does not have VR but I find it to be an excellent lens. When I researched it, I found it rated as one of Nikkor's more popular lenses.
Opus
Loc: South East Michigan
I have owned a Nikon 80-200 f2.8 for years. Of the 7 zoom lenses I presently own and the the 5 Nikon zooms I have said "Goodbye" to, this is clearly the best. Because I only use it outdoors I have found that I don't need VR. It is the only lens I have that is left over from my film days.
I am not aware of a F2.8 18-200 only 3.5. I have not heard of any faster glass at that zoom. They just came out with a 18-300 and still not any faster.
Thanks everyone! This lens is not carried at B&H Photo and other sites I use, so it was helpful to get your input!
I still have my old Nikon 80-200 2.8, although I did sell my F4's some time ago. The lens is incredibly sharp and still gets good reviews. Buy it if you can find one at a steal.
I am curious Amanda...did I miss something but everyone seems to be talking about 80-200 lens? and your question is about the 18-200 correct?
Bozsik
Loc: Orangevale, California
Nikocarol wrote:
I am curious Amanda...did I miss something but everyone seems to be talking about 80-200 lens? and your question is about the 18-200 correct?
I think the question was about the 18-200, and I don't think they do. Only the higher f-stop. People got side-tracked.
You can still find the older Nikon 80-200 f2.8D on
www.KEH.com for around $1000-$1100. Honestly I would only pay about $800 for a used one.
I guess maybe most of got sidetracked on this posting - the first one I read was talking about a Nikon 80-200,f2.8 and how she couldn't find one listed anywhere. That is what I was referring to, that I still had mine from many years ago??
Sorry if I missed something
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.