Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Looking for Binoculars
Page <<first <prev 4 of 9 next> last>>
Feb 23, 2017 08:39:09   #
Festus Loc: North Dakota
 
NealB wrote:
I am looking to purchase binoculars to take with me on some of my photo treks. I have looked at probably all of the vendors in the Chicago area but no one has a selection to pick from. I would hate to spend up to $1,000.00 and get some thing less than satisfactory. I am open to all suggestions from current users. Thank you in advance.


Check out Maven. You can choose the features that you want and have them custom made. They are very highly rated.

http://mavenbuilt.com/

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 08:47:38   #
sathca Loc: Narragansett Rhode Island
 
Wow! How disturbing! A blog by its very nature is a place to come for advice, conversation, comparison of thoughts on a mutually agreed subject. Why would someone question the motives, belittle, condem, dismiss another member looking for the above. What an attitude! We're all sitting in our recliners, not to be " force fed" but to learn from one other source. Lighten up!

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 08:53:00   #
Kingman
 
No matter what you spend on sporting binoculars, they will pretty much all give similar performance in full daylight conditions. Where premium optics such as Leica, Zeiss and other high priced optics give you is the ability to see in low light conditions (such as dawn or dusk). When going to a sporting goods shop to test out optics, certainly look outside, but where you will notice the performance difference in premium optics is when you look in dimly lighted areas of the store or in the darken shadowed areas of the store. If the ability to see objects in minimal light is not an important need, you have just saved yourself a great deal of coin. The larger the front lens will gather more light but these will also weigh more, so weight may also be an issue. Serious bird watchers and hunters generally want to be able to see their subjects in first or last light conditions and hence the need and difference of high performance and expensive optics.

Reply
 
 
Feb 23, 2017 08:54:36   #
O2Ra
 
Festus wrote:
Check out Maven. You can choose the features that you want and have them custom made. They are very highly rated.

http://mavenbuilt.com/


The maven stuff looks nice . How does it stack up to the big boys ?
So many manufacturers have upped their game on affordable quality binos. It probably hurts the Swarovski and Ziess sales. I have some Minox and the quality is just phenomenal. Even though my favorite all time binos were the Swarovski porros.

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 08:56:20   #
larryjphoto Loc: Phoenix
 
rjaywallace wrote:
Don't badger me, pal! I'm from Chicago (45+ years), by way of Ohio, New York City area, Boulder, and AZ. The OP "says" he looked at "probably all of the venders in the Chicago area" and couldn't find "a selection" -- that is a blatent lie! Sears, L.L. Bean, Cabela's, Bass Pro Shops, Dick's Sporting Goods, Central Camera and any number of full service camera stores...just to name a very few. Truth is, HE NEVER LOOKED AT ALL. Let alone went on line to B&H, Adorama, Cameta, KEH, Amazon, etc., etc. He just wants to sit in his recliner and have us 'force feed' him. I'm too old and tired to put up with that s¥#t. Have a photogenic day.
Don't badger me, pal! I'm from Chicago (45+ years)... (show quote)


Didn't your mother teach you that if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all? If you don't want to waste time with questions like his, don't waste your time by answering them.

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 08:57:32   #
edhjr Loc: Needham, MA
 
I like the Canon's with vibration reduction the best (a bit heavier but the vibration reduction works well) or Leica's without VR. Birding websites are a good source but often do not carry the Cannons with VR. I have used the Canons all over the world -- particularly good on safari or on boats while moving... Good luck

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 09:04:19   #
deepdiverv Loc: arizona
 
Try Optics planet or B&H

Reply
 
 
Feb 23, 2017 09:04:40   #
O2Ra
 
Kingman wrote:
No matter what you spend on sporting binoculars, they will pretty much all give similar performance in full daylight conditions. Where premium optics such as Leica, Zeiss and other high priced optics give you is the ability to see in low light conditions (such as dawn or dusk). When going to a sporting goods shop to test out optics, certainly look outside, but where you will notice the performance difference in premium optics is when you look in dimly lighted areas of the store or in the darken shadowed areas of the store. If the ability to see objects in minimal light is not an important need, you have just saved yourself a great deal of coin. The larger the front lens will gather more light but these will also weigh more, so weight may also be an issue. Serious bird watchers and hunters generally want to be able to see their subjects in first or last light conditions and hence the need and difference of high performance and expensive optics.
No matter what you spend on sporting binoculars, t... (show quote)

This is exactly right . The quality will shine , no pun intended, in the shadows and low light situations.
Hunters are really big on the low light performance and light weight. 8-10 power in the 40-42mm objective range is the preferred choice for weight to performance ratio. Go over 10 power and it's harder to hand hold and the subject get shakey. More power actually helps bring in more light also.
Better optics will also make it easier to isolate the subject when looking through dense cover. Better coatings cut lens flare and allow you to view the subject better even when looking into the setting sun.

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 09:04:43   #
EdU239 Loc: The Northeast
 
NealB wrote:
I am looking to purchase binoculars to take with me on some of my photo treks. I have looked at probably all of the vendors in the Chicago area but no one has a selection to pick from. I would hate to spend up to $1,000.00 and get some thing less than satisfactory. I am open to all suggestions from current users. Thank you in advance.


You may have to order online, but I would suggest looking at a good compact/pocket binocular, 8x20, 8x25 or 10x25. If you can spend up to $1,000, consider the versions from Leica, Zeiss, Swarovski or Nikon Premiers (Nikon makes cheaper model as well)--costs range from around $550 to $800 and they are all superb. They all make 10x25s. Leica, Zeiss and Nikon make 8x20s, while Swarovski now has an 8x25. Note that many people find it hard to keep a 10x25 steady. Also, the 8x models have a noticeably wider field of view.

These are all roof prism binoculars with straight barrels. You might also consider a reverse
porro design. The Bushnell Elite 7x26 is excellent, although somewhat bigger than the others.

Finally, you might try an Audubon society store if there's one close to you. They usually have a good selection with a range of sizes and prices.

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 09:06:40   #
JohnK
 
I looked at a pair that I think was offered by National Geographic, found a bird food store that had them in stock. Was glad that I tried them hands on, they would not adjust wide enough apart to work with both eyes. Just a heads up, I think you have to actually try them out before buying.

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 09:09:08   #
sinderone
 
I just bought a new pair for my trips to SE Asia and Alaska. I did endless research and ultimately purchased the Vortex Diamondback 10 x42. They are in the $200-250 range. While you can spend a whole lot more, these were the best bang for the buck and are often compared to far more expensive units. They are completely water and fog proof and Vortex has the best warranty in the business. They are located in Wisconsin and have an amazing customer service department who will answer any questions you may have. By the way, I bought mine from B&H who had the best price and were a pleasure to deal with.

FYI- I lived in Wisconsin for a few years and there are plenty of guys like the one who first responded to you. Generally angry and in need of someone to take it out on. Most reasonable people know there is no such thing as a stupid question. Take him with a grain of salt.

Good luck!

Reply
 
 
Feb 23, 2017 09:19:50   #
howlynn Loc: pueblo west, co
 
I bought the canon 10X42 image stabilization binoculars with the canon 'L' lens. They are the only canon binoculars that are waterproof others are water resistant. The 'L' lens are really sharp and good in low light. Purchased mine from Adorama.

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 09:19:59   #
LXK0930 Loc: Souh Jersey
 
Boy! I thought that I had accidentally accessed the WWF (wrestling) site!

Anyway, if you have no experience with binoculars, here are a few tips:

(1) Do some homework. There are many good sites concerning binoculars that should prove helpful.
(2) Decide how you are going to use the binoculars. You need a vastly different binocular for theater than for game watching than for bird watching.
(3) Go to a physical store and try the binocular (or at least similar ones) to determine "fit" (weight, size, feel, etc).
(4) Remember that there are significant differences in quality. Don't expect a $50 pair to give you the same results as a $1000 pair. Note that Consumers Reports did an evaluation of binoculars several years ago. It should be available online or in the library.
(5) Subjectively, I have found that binoculars from the Japanese camera makers (Nikon, Canon, Pentax, etc.) offer more value than the high-end German makers (Leitz, Zeiss). But then, I generally have a "good enough" attitude towards equipment.

Hope that helps.

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 09:32:00   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
I have used Leica 10X40 binoculars for many years and love them. I have also used Zeiss and Swarovski. All are the very top of the line but are expensive. If you can't afford those brands then Nikon makes great binoculars as well. I have tried the very small and lightweight binoculars and hate them. For me they are hard to focus and uncomfortable to use. I much prefer the full size. For birding I think the 10 power would be much more effective than 6 or 8 power. Lenses that are 40mm at the objective lenses will let in more light than 32mm. Binoculars with 50mm lenses let in more light but are heavy to carry. Good luck finding what you want.

Dennis

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 09:32:14   #
steve_stoneblossom Loc: Rhode Island, USA
 
randave2001 wrote:
Even though I find the comments from rlaywallace to be inexcusably offensive, he did make a good point about doing some research on your own. I spent about 5 minutes and found this article on B&H's website that I would like to share with you. An informed consumer is usually a happy camper after the purchase. Enjoy

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/outdoors/buying-guide/binocular

Good article.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.