Screamin Scott wrote:
I like how they can diagnosis someone without even seeing them in person, boy talk about good.... lol
Hey, there's an internet quack making the rounds here right now that says trump is a genius, sight unseen, but it's only ONE guy and the wingers turned that into meme!!! Even trumps wife won't live with him, what does she know that you don't and the mental health world does?!!! LoL
27,000, even if half are wrong, the numbers are pretty overwhelming. you didn't see that going on with Obama? Even the wingers would laugh at you!!!
SS
It seems that many people of this forum are not interested in the exchange of ideas. They seem to just wish to make the camel's piss upon other people.
Twardlow wrote:
Yes Indeed! In this country we allow only temporary violations of our constitution!--just a short-term Religious Test, Thank You.
Your panties are so twisted they're cutting off your circulation. Please elaborate how TEMPORARILY restricting foreign nationals in accordance with established law violates OUR Constitution? And what "Religious Test" would you be referring to? The one that was completely mischaracterized by the MSM? The one that says nothing about 40+ other predominately Muslim countries?
Keenan
Loc: Central Coast California
Fat Gregory wrote:
27000+ supposed Mental Healthcare "Professionals" diagnose based on their politics... man is our society in trouble and Sick
If it is based on their politics, then why didn't his happen when GWB was elected? Oops, just shot your theory all to hell. You live in a fact free world, fat Gregory. Now tell me again how going over to Vietnam to kill Vietnamese people protected my freedoms. lol
Ask the Democratic presidents that escalated that conflict, Oh wait, you can't as they are both dead. Ike had advisors over there, but the subsequent Democratic administrations upped the ante or have you forgotten, if are you even old enough to know that ?
Keenan wrote:
If it is based on their politics, then why didn't his happen when GWB was elected? Oops, just shot your theory all to hell. You live in a fact free world, fat Gregory. Now tell me again how going over to Vietname to kill Vietnamese people protected my freedoms. lol
Keenan
Loc: Central Coast California
Screamin Scott wrote:
Ask the Democratic presidents that escalated that conflict, Oh wait, you can't as they are both dead. Ike had advisors over there, but the subsequent Democratic administrations upped the ante or have you forgotten, if are you even old enough to know that ?
What? Try responding to my points, rather than just spewing random jumbled babble about Democratic presidents that has nothing to do with any of my arguments that you responded to. If you are capable.
skylane5sp wrote:
Your panties are so twisted they're cutting off your circulation. Please elaborate how TEMPORARILY restricting foreign nationals in accordance with established law violates OUR Constitution? And what "Religious Test" would you be referring to? The one that was completely mischaracterized by the MSM? The one that says nothing about 40+ other predominately Muslim countries?
Sky, the point is that NONE of us will ever know the actual legalities in that ban, it's too complex.
BUT, THAT SAID, four judges have struck it down. Upon examination, the trump administration knows it will NEVER be legal so they have abandoned the EO and are gonna rewrite a completely new one. That's an admission of defeat, ANY law professor will tell you that. It was the result of neophytes crafting a poorly written order and they thought it would fly and nobody would look because trump is drunk with power.
Well guess what, four judges sobered him up in a hurry and reminded him he is a citizen just like you and I when it comes to the law! He then cried like a baby !!
So to challenge someone here about something you know absolutely nothing about is ludicrous. Is it not enough that 4 EXPERTS threw it back in trumks face?!?!?
SS
Screamin Scott wrote:
Twist it anyway you want, the fact remains he was on a hot mike with the Russian ambassador, not fellow US politicians or US citizens, big difference....
I'm not trying to start anything, but I see no difference at all. It must be a universal among elected politicians, and even Russians who aren't genuinely elected, that you can't go mouthin' off before an election, but you might make a deal afterwards.
Then why did you bring up this ?.... I just responded to your post or do you suffer from Dementia or Alzheimers ?...
Keenan wrote:
Now tell me again how going over to Vietnam to kill Vietnamese people protected my freedoms. lol
Keenan wrote:
What? Try responding to my points, rather than just spewing random jumbled babble about Democratic presidents that has nothing to do with any of my arguments that you responded to. If you are capable.
Keenan
Loc: Central Coast California
Screamin Scott wrote:
Then why did you bring up this ?.... I just responded to your post or do you suffer from Dementia or Alzheimers ?...
Grow up Scott. Take responsibility for your own behavior for once.
I have no issues, it seems you do though.
Achmed wrote:
Trumpy Style ! You get it from both so called ends!
Good catch Achmed!!!! You naughty boy. Hey, boy to I have a friend suggestion for you. Look up Keenan! Both ends? That boy should love that!! Go get 'em Achmed.
[quote=Checkmate][b]Twatlo, you are one sick POS ni**er lover that kisses the ass of the most traitorous half wit, half ass, half breed.[/quote]
Checkmate, I think you are holding back, you should tell him what you really think.
green wrote:
admit it, we were screwed no matter what happened in the election.... at least with Trump, it will be a new "position".
Well, at least we have never tried this one before, are we sure that it does not violate some antiquated sodomy law?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.