Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What camera did you start with and how old were you?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 10 next> last>>
Jun 14, 2012 09:52:02   #
gilbert Loc: Melbourne, Fl
 
I forgot to add some other camera's. After the Yashika 35mm film camera got put away I bought a HP 945 and recorded over 10,000 snaps with it. The camera body started to just like rot away. Bits and pieces kept falling off around the battery compartment. Then I got a Sony pocket camera at a fleamarket for $10.00, I think it was a 500s, 6 megapixels. It was such a great camera. I kept it in my hip pocket. Big mistake. The fine sand got into the lense mechanism and cause it to jam. Kaput. Then I got a fleamarket Nikon $8.00 and it still works ok but I wanted to do some wild life telephoto work so I got a Canon 10D off ebay $150.00. It is great for just anything you want to shoot. I got so after shooting long range shots and blow them up I didn't like the soft pictures. I bit the bullet last week and went to Walmart and got the Canon Rebel T3i kit. I bid on a Canon D5 Mark ii used but it sold for $1,600.00 on ebay, way too much money for a used camera without any extra stuff. Keep on snapping.

Reply
Jun 14, 2012 09:56:54   #
brianjdavies Loc: Gloucester
 
I started taking pictures at about age 15 with my father's Dacora 6X6 bellows camera (I bet not many people remember that German brand now). I greatly desired a Pentax Spotmatic in the 1960s, but because it was beyond my limited financial resources, I contented myself with various M42 bodies, such as a Prinzflex (Cosina) and Chinon Memotron. At least these permitted the use of Pentax lenses. Now, I have a collection of more than 40 cameras, but for day to day use I have a Nikon D3 and a D200 converted to infra-red. Because the Nikons are somewhat bulky and heavy, I mostly use a Pentax K5 when I'm out and about. I respect the Nikons as being great cameras, but I LOVE my Pentax!

Reply
Jun 14, 2012 09:59:51   #
Greg-Colo Loc: Fort Collins,Co
 
Instamatic....age 10, Vivitar sl400 in the early 70's, fuji s700, current is Canon sx30is Good thread :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Jun 14, 2012 10:05:34   #
gene327 Loc: Liberty, Missouri
 
My first camera was my dads Argus C3 pre range finder and I learned a lot just taking pictures using verichrome pan which was cheap at the time, a 24 exposeure roll cost about a dollar.

Reply
Jun 14, 2012 10:06:24   #
alliebess Loc: suburban Philadelphia
 
I started at about age 7 when my father sent me off to school with his folding Ansco (116 film) to photograph my classmates - I still have some of those photos! Then got a Kodak box camera and a home darkroom set and my sister and I made contact prints in elementary school. In high school saved my money and bought a Kodak 35mm for about $90 (big money for me in those days) which I used until many years later up graded to a Pentax K-1000. Moved into the digital age about 5 years ago with a Kodak Z740 which I still use.

Reply
Jun 14, 2012 10:24:12   #
OBXbill Loc: Outer Banks NC / Cape Coral FL
 
My dad gave me an Argus 75 620 film camera in 1956. I was eleven at the time. First camera I had and used it for 10 years before it gave out. Now I have a Canon 7D which I truly enjoy.

Reply
Jun 14, 2012 10:29:40   #
Weddingguy Loc: British Columbia - Canada
 
bikinkawboy wrote:
Here's some photos of my grandfather's camera, made by the Seneca camera company. It used glass plate negatives. You first focused the image on the ground glass focusing plate on the rear of the camera, then slipped the negative holder between the focusing plate and camera body and then removed the front and rear cover from the negative. It has wooden plates you can move around to get one 5X7, two 3.5X5 photos of four smaller ones. I still have the suitcase sized carrying case and black cape you throw over yourself when focusing it. Not sure how old it is, but I think they started making them in about 1909-1910 and I still have the photo grandpa took of my dad when he was born in 1919. We don't know how good we have it these days.
Here's some photos of my grandfather's camera, mad... (show quote)



Two little old ladies were having their picture taken with a camera just like yours. The photographer had the black cape over his head behind the camera when one of the ladies asked the other . . . "What is he doing now"?
The second lady answered,"He's going to focus"
The first lady with a shocked look on her face said, "What . . the both of us"?

I started with a "Donald Duck" camera at age 11 in 1949. Quickly tired of that and bought an Argus A2, 35mm camera with my paper route $$$. By age 12 I had a full darkroom in my basement including an enlarger that my dad helped me build from an old 5x7 view camera. 5 years later I was in the photography business and haven't looked back. Photography is still my profession, my passion and my hobby . . . I've never had a job . . . I've only been a photographer.

Reply
 
 
Jun 14, 2012 10:31:42   #
bikinkawboy Loc: north central Missouri
 
The Brownie that I started off with was one of those big old brown bakeolite bodied jobs. From the replies, it would seem that while yes, Kodak produced a lot of inexpensive cameras that produced photos of limited quality, they did get many, many people started in the photography hobby. No doubt they also allowed many ordinary folks to afford a camera they could use to take snapshots of family. And of the latter, no doubt many of those photos leave a lot to be desired in artistic value, they are no doubt priceless to the people they belong to. It's a shame Kodak's reputation and industry standing has eroded so much lately.

Reply
Jun 14, 2012 10:31:54   #
jackm1943 Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
 
My first new camera was a Kowa SE, a fixed lens leaf shutter 35mm SLR, purchased in the mid '60s while in college. It actually made pretty good quality images. At the time, I had Pentax envy but couldn't afford one until later in life.

Reply
Jun 14, 2012 10:33:50   #
alliebess Loc: suburban Philadelphia
 
bikinkawboy wrote:
The Brownie that I started off with was one of those big old brown bakeolite bodied jobs. From the replies, it would seem that while yes, Kodak produced a lot of inexpensive cameras that produced photos of limited quality, they did get many, many people started in the photography hobby. No doubt they also allowed many ordinary folks to afford a camera they could use to take snapshots of family. And of the latter, no doubt many of those photos leave a lot to be desired in artistic value, they are no doubt priceless to the people they belong to. It's a shame Kodak's reputation and industry standing has eroded so much lately.
The Brownie that I started off with was one of tho... (show quote)


Amen! I believe Kodak was one of the early developers of digital cameras but were overwhelmed by other companies.

Reply
Jun 14, 2012 10:51:33   #
bobmcculloch Loc: NYC, NY
 
videop wrote:
Oh my goodness, what a neat question. Let's see, I think I started with an "Ansco" box camera in the late 40's and progressed to a Brownie. Other cameras over the years. Polaroid,Mamya,Roleflex,Hasellblad,Fuji,Graflex press, currently own Nikon D90 and D300. :thumbup:


In like this thread, there are people older than me here, VBG, Bob.

Reply
 
 
Jun 14, 2012 11:02:43   #
Wil Loc: Northern California
 
Was in the service assigned to Midway Island. Yasica Mat twin lens 2 1/4 replaced with Roleflex.

Reply
Jun 14, 2012 11:11:45   #
Baz Loc: Peterborough UK
 
I started with an unknown (un-remembered) 120 box camera when I was 8 years old, but the first "real" camera was a Halina 35x. A 35mm rangefinder with a remarkably good lens for the princely sum of aprox £6 back in '61. From then on it has been a varied selection of OMs, Nikons, Bronicas, moving on to digital - the last 4 have been Nikon, with the new baby (D800) arriving this morning. Battery charging as we speak. That first one has a lot to answer for.

Reply
Jun 14, 2012 12:11:27   #
TomballLegend Loc: Tomball, Texas
 
If that's true, "PRO STUFF", then why is your Avitar(bio pic)such quentionable representation of "Pro Stuff"?

Reply
Jun 14, 2012 12:16:58   #
-lois- Loc: Oregon
 
Started off with a bellowed Polaroid that took great INSTANT B&Ws. Loved that camera but the availability of film was scarce even the....it was the type that you separated from the packet and then put that stinky pink stuff across it to finish it...smelled like vinegar! By the time I graduated from HS, I bought my first slr and zoom lense (MUST GET CLOSER!) my first was a Pentax ME Super. When digital came out, I used the colleges one and only Sony (I think) brick that held 3.5 floppies...and then I've been in to Olympus ever since. Starts with an affordable point and shoot and progressively moved up...to their way more affordable dslrs.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.