Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Long Exposure.Waterfall. First Attempt
Page 1 of 2 next>
Feb 9, 2017 11:07:04   #
Rloren
 
This is my first attempt at long exposure/waterfall. Took multiple shots at different shutter speeds. Do not have a polarizing filter.
It would be better if I did??.. Before and after photos.





Reply
Feb 9, 2017 11:10:43   #
lloydl2 Loc: Gilbert, AZ
 
a neutral density filter would allow for longer shutter speeds increasing the smoothing effect.. sometimes taking multiple shots and then merging them into a single helps to fill in the water too

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 11:16:38   #
strike3
 
Looks to me that the sun was out in the first shot. Cloudy day is best for waterfalls - no bright spots to deal with. Just my humble opinion.

Reply
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Feb 9, 2017 11:21:06   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
You have the idea, but the second photo has quite a lot of blown out areas. As suggested, and ND filter would help, along with use of proper exposure techniques.
--Bob

Rloren wrote:
This is my first attempt at long exposure/waterfall. Took multiple shots at different shutter speeds. Do not have a polarizing filter.
It would be better if I did??.. Before and after photos.

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 11:37:47   #
Rloren
 
rmalarz wrote:
You have the idea, but the second photo has quite a lot of blown out areas. As suggested, and ND filter would help, along with use of proper exposure techniques.
--Bob


Settings were: Aperture f/16, ISO..100, 1/8 second shutter speed. Guessing shutter way too fast. Use a filter to slow it down?

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 11:40:37   #
Rloren
 
Rloren wrote:
Settings were: Aperture f/16, ISO..100, 1/8 second shutter speed. Guessing shutter way too fast. Use a filter to slow it down?


Haven't gotten into processing yet PS. These are just unprocessed shots.

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 11:48:03   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
lloydl2 wrote:
a neutral density filter would allow for longer shutter speeds increasing the smoothing effect.. sometimes taking multiple shots and then merging them into a single helps to fill in the water too



Reply
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Feb 9, 2017 12:34:01   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
Rloren wrote:
This is my first attempt at long exposure/waterfall. Took multiple shots at different shutter speeds. Do not have a polarizing filter.
It would be better if I did??.. Before and after photos.


You absolutely do not want a CPL when photographing moving water. It's the reflections and movement you are after.

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 12:39:38   #
catchlight.. Loc: Wisconsin USA- Halden Norway
 
Adding detail in Photoshop:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZYas6VmVXU&t=212s

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 13:34:31   #
G Brown Loc: Sunny Bognor Regis West Sussex UK
 
Your camera software should be able to alter the exposure in Post Processing.... For long exposures use a tripod, plus you can go at dusk or dawn to stop some of the bright light and get an even longer shutter speed.
Look at using N grad filter when you want the sky in the image and a full filter to slow everything down if no sky or bright bits.
have fun

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 13:46:51   #
Star Shotz Loc: Weeki Wachee Fl
 
Gorgeous

Reply
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Feb 9, 2017 14:40:17   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Rloren wrote:
This is my first attempt at long exposure/waterfall. Took multiple shots at different shutter speeds. Do not have a polarizing filter.
It would be better if I did??.. Before and after photos.


You can use an ND filter,

Or . . .

You can use a series of shorter exposures and use stackmode in photoshop to merge the images.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeFvtjmLid0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=camWIvVZlbU

These two images were an experiment - disregard the blown out area at the bottom of the waterfall.

I used a series of 14 exposures at 1/25 sec, F11, ISO 50 and merged them in Photoshop to produce the final. So the first is a typical single image, and the second is the stack.


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 15:00:37   #
Leitz Loc: Solms
 
Gene51 wrote:
You can use an ND filter,

Or . . .

You can use a series of shorter exposures and use stackmode in photoshop to merge the images.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeFvtjmLid0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=camWIvVZlbU

These two images were an experiment - disregard the blown out area at the bottom of the waterfall.

I used a series of 14 exposures at 1/25 sec, F11, ISO 50 and merged them in Photoshop to produce the final. So the first is a typical single image, and the second is the stack.
You can use an ND filter, br br Or . . . br br Y... (show quote)

Yours looks natural - I think the OP is looking for that waste-treatment-plant-upstream look!

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 15:04:44   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Very nice work, Gene, especially the second one.
--Bob

Gene51 wrote:
You can use an ND filter,

Or . . .

You can use a series of shorter exposures and use stackmode in photoshop to merge the images.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeFvtjmLid0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=camWIvVZlbU

These two images were an experiment - disregard the blown out area at the bottom of the waterfall.

I used a series of 14 exposures at 1/25 sec, F11, ISO 50 and merged them in Photoshop to produce the final. So the first is a typical single image, and the second is the stack.
You can use an ND filter, br br Or . . . br br Y... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 15:29:02   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
Leitz wrote:
Yours looks natural - I think the OP is looking for that waste-treatment-plant-upstream look!


Agreed, and I like your metaphor 😀.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.