rgrenaderphoto wrote:
Who cares? Art is subjective. If you find the final result pleasing, what difference does it make?
Thanks for your comment. I do like the end result.
Pixelpusher wrote:
NormantheGr8"" So your a graphic artist now ? Although the special effects look great it really does , can you look yourself in the eye and say I shot that, or do you say I made that computer generated picture? ""
Let me pipe in.. I think also Kymarto, Spider 223 Have a valid point as well. this issue comes up from time to time.
Most of my work is Highly Manipulated to say the least. Although I do produce some photojournalistic work. With Abosulutely No manipulation
I pretty much stopped posting here as I didn't find any other work like mine.
they should divide this thread into Minimum post processing photo gallery and a Highly processed Photo Gallery
you can see from the attached example how far afield Iv'e gone
NormantheGr8"" So your a graphic artist... (
show quote)
Thanks for your comments! I hope you will start reposting here again. Interesting images should always be welcome.
In my opinion, you took a kind of ho hum photo and used it as a base for creating a more interesting, much more colorful and pleasing image. As long as it's not misrepresented, it's simply having fun and being creative. Artists do that all the time. Use multiple photos as references and combine them into the painting that they imagine in their mind. You did a great job!
LorrieLynn wrote:
In my opinion, you took a kind of ho hum photo and used it as a base for creating a more interesting, much more colorful and pleasing image. As long as it's not misrepresented, it's simply having fun and being creative. Artists do that all the time. Use multiple photos as references and combine them into the painting that they imagine in their mind. You did a great job!
Thanks LorrieLynn - that is exactly the way I approached this image. I tend to view camera bodies, lenses, filters, and software as tools that you can apply to an image to make it your own. I just don't feel that the raw image is sacrosanct, but I'm okay if others do. In this instance, I had an idea as to what I wanted the end result to look like, and was curious to see if I could do it. I think its fun to start a shoot with an idea, and then see if you can make that happen.
In this photo, the only elements that were not actually present were the lightning bolts. They were added because I wasn't satisfied with the sky. Everything else (sand, rocks, water) was there on that grey morning at the shore.
I would encourage everyone to exercise their creativity, and not feel constrained because others may feel differently.
willaim
Loc: Sunny Southern California
yssirk123 wrote:
Still playing around with Anthropics' LandscapePro software. Had some free time one overcast morning, so I took a ride to the Jersey shore. It was a pretty overcast day, but I thought it might be fun to grab some images and see what could be done with them. The before is the orginal image; the after was run through LandscapePro, Photoshop and Topaz Adjust.
I like the enhancement, but the lightning bolts look fake to me.
It looks artificial, so if that's the goal, it's well done. Don't mean to be harsh but you asked.
I love Post Processing! You've made that photo explode from the page. Good job.
Flyerace wrote:
I love Post Processing! You've made that photo explode from the page. Good job.
Thanks Flyerace! I appreciate your comment.
...it's art! YOU are the artist. Art being what it is, will always engender positive and negative comments...such is life. As photographers in the present, we are gifted with a plethora of tools to use for our art...I like to think the great photographic artists of the past, given a time window to see what we have now, would be envious! But, of course, there would be the naysayers...heh...
sailorsmom wrote:
Good job, yssirk123!
Thanks for the comment Sue!
chasgroh wrote:
...it's art! YOU are the artist. Art being what it is, will always engender positive and negative comments...such is life. As photographers in the present, we are gifted with a plethora of tools to use for our art...I like to think the great photographic artists of the past, given a time window to see what we have now, would be envious! But, of course, there would be the naysayers...heh...
Thanks Charlie - I agree completely. I appreciate all the tools available to us today, and intend to continue having fun using them.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.