Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Tack Sharp Pictures and Shutter Speed
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
Jun 11, 2012 18:41:34   #
geraldjohnson
 
I tend not to buy pigs in a poke, so let me see it, if I like it, I will buy it.
otherwise no thanks.
I don't buy anything sight unseen.
or if I do, I am assured of getting my money back if it not worth it.
so, its your choice, gerald

Reply
Jun 11, 2012 19:12:45   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
geraldjohnson wrote:
I tend not to buy pigs in a poke, so let me see it, if I like it, I will buy it.
otherwise no thanks.
I don't buy anything sight unseen.
or if I do, I am assured of getting my money back if it not worth it.
so, its your choice, gerald


He posted a 10 page sample....do you buy your food like that too? You eat it and then decide if you want to pay for it?

Reply
Jun 11, 2012 19:47:50   #
PCL92
 
Tina,
My buddy purchased the 7D as well. He also had issues with "tack sharp". He lives in NJ near one of the Canon repair centers. He had the Canon tech reps look at the camera and lens combination that he uses. A 70-200 F2.... and a prime 400mm F 4.... I think. In any case Canon found that the sensor was not placed in the exact location it should be when the camera was made. I would find out the nearest location of a service center and bring or ship the camera to them. Call first so you get a authorization number and explain why you are returning the camera. By the way it took 3 trys for Canon to get it right.

Reply
 
 
Jun 11, 2012 21:46:09   #
silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
 
jamesbrandon wrote:
There will always be haters out there rpavich, so don't worry about weddingguy or silver. I know their type and it's useless trying to debate with them. They can stick to their own methods and I will not lose any sleep over it.

I know the information in the book is solid and that's all that matters to me :-). I shoot full time and use these methods every day of my life.


In response, First of all I am not a hater as you so wrongly label, how can you say such a thing, shame on you. You say that you know there type, what nonsense. I am not looking to debate, I am looking to cut through all the nonsense and silly techniques that "experts" are talking about. I never insist that my "methods" are the only "methods" that is just total nonsense. What I do believe is that people should learn as much as they can and be the best photographer and artist that they can be. I see so many silly techniques on this site and all the people that post them insist that there way is the best and only way. I shoot full frame and I am a professional photographer and I have been for 35 years. I have a strong film background including 4x5 view cameras. I also teach photography. I have never told my students that my way is the only way as you do, I tell my students to try all different techniques and find out for themselves what works best. I am happy that you stick to your own methods, you evidentially have found what works for you and thats great. Your mistake is assuming that everybody should do things your way, you evidentially cant learn any more. You dont know me at all and you can "type " me, what a useless comment. There may be some useful information in your book and I think thats great but as you said, not me "they can stick to there own methods and I will not lose any sleep over it". Maybe you are the one who cant learn because you have all the answers, nobody can teach you anything. I learn every day and I love to learn and I will never stop learning.One last thing, I was responding to the subject of handholding. This issue has a lot of admirers and if they like there results fine. My experience is that handholding is by far not a great thing. Images are so so sharp at best and by your admission shoot a lot and choose the best. Burst mode in your words.

Reply
Jun 11, 2012 22:00:25   #
Photogdog Loc: New Kensington, PA
 
PCL92 wrote:
Tina,
My buddy purchased the 7D as well. He also had issues with "tack sharp". He lives in NJ near one of the Canon repair centers. He had the Canon tech reps look at the camera and lens combination that he uses. A 70-200 F2.... and a prime 400mm F 4.... I think. In any case Canon found that the sensor was not placed in the exact location it should be when the camera was made. I would find out the nearest location of a service center and bring or ship the camera to them. Call first so you get a authorization number and explain why you are returning the camera. By the way it took 3 trys for Canon to get it right.
Tina, br My buddy purchased the 7D as well. He al... (show quote)


PCL92,

When did your buddy get his 7D? I got mine about a week ago & bought it refurbished through BH. One of the reasons, besides cost, was that I figured a rebuild would go through the whole checklist before being shipped. Most companies use random sampling to do QC checks.

However, another UHH member bought her 7D recently as a refurbished model shortly before I got mine. She just e-mailed me that her sample is displaying a "99" or "99" error message. BH is going to repair or replace, but I Googled 7D errors & read some pretty scary things. Everyone else I read prior to purchase gave the 7D high marks

PD

Reply
Jun 11, 2012 22:44:08   #
jamesbrandon Loc: Fort Worth
 
silver wrote:
jamesbrandon wrote:
There will always be haters out there rpavich, so don't worry about weddingguy or silver. I know their type and it's useless trying to debate with them. They can stick to their own methods and I will not lose any sleep over it.

I know the information in the book is solid and that's all that matters to me :-). I shoot full time and use these methods every day of my life.


In response, First of all I am not a hater as you so wrongly label, how can you say such a thing, shame on you. You say that you know there type, what nonsense. I am not looking to debate, I am looking to cut through all the nonsense and silly techniques that "experts" are talking about. I never insist that my "methods" are the only "methods" that is just total nonsense. What I do believe is that people should learn as much as they can and be the best photographer and artist that they can be. I see so many silly techniques on this site and all the people that post them insist that there way is the best and only way. I shoot full frame and I am a professional photographer and I have been for 35 years. I have a strong film background including 4x5 view cameras. I also teach photography. I have never told my students that my way is the only way as you do, I tell my students to try all different techniques and find out for themselves what works best. I am happy that you stick to your own methods, you evidentially have found what works for you and thats great. Your mistake is assuming that everybody should do things your way, you evidentially cant learn any more. You dont know me at all and you can "type " me, what a useless comment. There may be some useful information in your book and I think thats great but as you said, not me "they can stick to there own methods and I will not lose any sleep over it". Maybe you are the one who cant learn because you have all the answers, nobody can teach you anything. I learn every day and I love to learn and I will never stop learning.One last thing, I was responding to the subject of handholding. This issue has a lot of admirers and if they like there results fine. My experience is that handholding is by far not a great thing. Images are so so sharp at best and by your admission shoot a lot and choose the best. Burst mode in your words.
quote=jamesbrandon There will always be haters ou... (show quote)


Silver you crack me up, really :-). Your biggest blunder in that last rambling was that I assume I have all the answers and that I have stopped learning. Where did you get this information? From the fact that I said you weren't worth my time? Where did I even hint that I have stopped learning or that my way is the only way? This entire conversation was happy and uplifting until you and wedding guy came in and started saying how my way was wrong :-).

Allow me to post a quote from one of my earlier posts that you obviously didn't catch ;-). "Warning to younger photographers: Experience doesn't make you talented, not even 30 years of it. Passion and a willingness to learn make you talented. The moment you start to think you're 'experienced' or 'seasoned' or better than everyone else is the moment you become unteachable. It's the moment your work starts to decline and the moment that everyone else's around you starts getting better. As for me, I'll always strive to have the attitude of an amateur. Even when I've been shooting for 30 years like our friend wedding guy ."

Take a moment to get caught up on the conversation before you go into 1000+ words worth of assumptions.

You can reply with more nonsense if you'd like but I won't read it and I won't respond to it. The rest of my posts here will be geared towards helping other photographers and getting help from them. Not wasting my time with people who are grumpy and angry at the world.

Reply
Jun 11, 2012 22:49:32   #
cecilia delacroix Loc: near Seattle
 
A few of the sample pages posted by James Brandon have piqued my interest; I'll likely purchase his ebook. After all, if one can spend literally hundreds (or thou$and$) of dollars on equipment, surely even one or two new ideas to try out would be worthy of a $10 investment. I think his website is splendid also. (One minor nitpick: the 5DMark2 actually does have a few "entry level consumer" preset options (via "CA" ['Creative Auto'] on the mode dial: "P" ('Smooth skin tones' on the menu), "L" ('Vivid blues and greens'), etc. Not exactly entry-level-friendly! LOL) At any rate, thank you, dabram, for sharing James' link! :)

Reply
 
 
Jun 11, 2012 23:13:30   #
jamesbrandon Loc: Fort Worth
 
cecilia delacroix wrote:
A few of the sample pages posted by James Brandon have piqued my interest; I'll likely purchase his ebook. After all, if one can spend literally hundreds (or thou$and$) of dollars on equipment, surely even one or two new ideas to try out would be worthy of a $10 investment. I think his website is splendid also. (One minor nitpick: the 5DMark2 actually does have a few "entry level consumer" preset options (via "CA" ['Creative Auto'] on the mode dial: "P" ('Smooth skin tones' on the menu), "L" ('Vivid blues and greens'), etc. Not exactly entry-level-friendly! LOL) At any rate, thank you, dabram, for sharing James' link! :)
A few of the sample pages posted by James Brandon ... (show quote)


hehe, thanks a ton cecilia! hope you enjoy it :-)

Reply
Jun 12, 2012 00:45:18   #
Tina
 
jamesbrandon wrote:
Tina wrote:
I have a Cannon 7D with a 70-200mm/2.8 IS lens . My pictures are not as sharp as I would like especially, when I handhold the camera. I was just reading some information about minimum shutter speeds and focal lengths. The author suggested that if the camera doesn't have a full frame sensor that the crop factor should be considered in the equation as well. The minimum shutter speed should be the inversion of the focal length times the crop factor when handholding. The problem becomes more pronounced with telephoto lens. For this rule of thumb, I suspect that the length of any teleconverter needs to be added as well. I understand about tripods, cable release and mirror lockup.

I'm working on the manual settings to capture waterfowl with a good depth of field (DOF) and shutter speed, it's been tricky. Trial and error works better when I can pinpoint any shortcomings and enjoy the process (lol). The question is two-fold: 1) Is it really that complicated? Has anyone else heard about and included all of these factors? 2) What's the best settings to capture waterfowl? Including AF point?
I have a Cannon 7D with a 70-200mm/2.8 IS lens . ... (show quote)


And now here's my two cents for Tina. Hope it helps...

Waterfowl and birds can be tricky. And getting sharp images is multi-facetted. You can do everything right in camera but if you have poor form when holding the camera you could still get soft or blurry images. So here's some tips that I think will help...

1) When hand holding with any lens (but especially a telephoto) study the way that military or law enforcement personel hold their rifles. This has been a huge help for me. Are your elbows flared out when you hold your camera? Try squeezing them in to where they are pointed at the ground. This is how they train people to hold rifles to make them steady so naturally it will work with cameras as well

2) After tucking in your elbows, rest your left elbow up against your stomach as an anchor point.

3) With a telephoto lens like the 70-200 the lens should rest in the palm of your left hand. Your left hand should support 99% percent of the weight of the camera. If you're holding the camera with your right hand that is likely the problem. The right hand should only be used to squeeze the trigger...ahem...shutter.

4) Roll your finger over the shutter. A lot of people stab at the shutter which induces camera shake. It doesn't take a lot of pressure to push the shutter in, so just ry rolling your finger over it with just enough pressure to take a picture.

----------------

Camera settings:

You're on track with the shutter speed stuff. But if you're trying to freeze a bird in action you need FAST shutter speeds. The one below was shot at 1/1250th at f/2.8 with the same lens as you mentioned. ISO was at only 100. I could have gotten faster by increasing the ISO but those settings froze the bird in place and STILL added a nice soft blur to the water behind it.

AF Point: This is where my ebook really gets into depth on this topic. For the shot below I used a single auto focus point and then used back button focus to track the bird in flight with the camera in AI-Servo mode.

Single AF helped because I could choose what to focus on instead of letting the camera guess at it. It would have likely failed several times by focusing on the water instead

Servo: This of course allowed me to track the movement of the bird and keep it in focus as long as my single AF point was over the bird.

Burst Mode: This is just to ensure the best chance of capturing just the right moment. Rather than taking one shot at a time, you increase your odds by shooting at your cameras maximum FPS rate. In my case, I was using a Canon 1Ds Mark III which shoots fairly slow at 5 fps. But I still managed to get plenty of good shots and picked the one with the best wing placement to edit.

Hope this helps :-)
quote=Tina I have a Cannon 7D with a 70-200mm/2.... (show quote)


Hi James,
Thanks for your response as well as writing the ebook. I am reading your ebook now. I appreciate having some solid information in a small package. I have lots of photography books and have viewed videos on the internet but, I needed a refresher. It's nice to have vital information in one place because it saves time. The time saved can be invested in taking pictures, having fun and doing what's most important. It is the best ten bucks I've spent in a long time. Tina

Reply
Jun 12, 2012 00:55:07   #
silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
 
jamesbrandon wrote:
silver wrote:
jamesbrandon wrote:
There will always be haters out there rpavich, so don't worry about weddingguy or silver. I know their type and it's useless trying to debate with them. They can stick to their own methods and I will not lose any sleep over it.

I know the information in the book is solid and that's all that matters to me :-). I shoot full time and use these methods every day of my life.


In response, First of all I am not a hater as you so wrongly label, how can you say such a thing, shame on you. You say that you know there type, what nonsense. I am not looking to debate, I am looking to cut through all the nonsense and silly techniques that "experts" are talking about. I never insist that my "methods" are the only "methods" that is just total nonsense. What I do believe is that people should learn as much as they can and be the best photographer and artist that they can be. I see so many silly techniques on this site and all the people that post them insist that there way is the best and only way. I shoot full frame and I am a professional photographer and I have been for 35 years. I have a strong film background including 4x5 view cameras. I also teach photography. I have never told my students that my way is the only way as you do, I tell my students to try all different techniques and find out for themselves what works best. I am happy that you stick to your own methods, you evidentially have found what works for you and thats great. Your mistake is assuming that everybody should do things your way, you evidentially cant learn any more. You dont know me at all and you can "type " me, what a useless comment. There may be some useful information in your book and I think thats great but as you said, not me "they can stick to there own methods and I will not lose any sleep over it". Maybe you are the one who cant learn because you have all the answers, nobody can teach you anything. I learn every day and I love to learn and I will never stop learning.One last thing, I was responding to the subject of handholding. This issue has a lot of admirers and if they like there results fine. My experience is that handholding is by far not a great thing. Images are so so sharp at best and by your admission shoot a lot and choose the best. Burst mode in your words.
quote=jamesbrandon There will always be haters ou... (show quote)


Silver you crack me up, really :-). Your biggest blunder in that last rambling was that I assume I have all the answers and that I have stopped learning. Where did you get this information? From the fact that I said you weren't worth my time? Where did I even hint that I have stopped learning or that my way is the only way? This entire conversation was happy and uplifting until you and wedding guy came in and started saying how my way was wrong :-).

Allow me to post a quote from one of my earlier posts that you obviously didn't catch ;-). "Warning to younger photographers: Experience doesn't make you talented, not even 30 years of it. Passion and a willingness to learn make you talented. The moment you start to think you're 'experienced' or 'seasoned' or better than everyone else is the moment you become unteachable. It's the moment your work starts to decline and the moment that everyone else's around you starts getting better. As for me, I'll always strive to have the attitude of an amateur. Even when I've been shooting for 30 years like our friend wedding guy ."

Take a moment to get caught up on the conversation before you go into 1000+ words worth of assumptions.

You can reply with more nonsense if you'd like but I won't read it and I won't respond to it. The rest of my posts here will be geared towards helping other photographers and getting help from them. Not wasting my time with people who are grumpy and angry at the world.
quote=silver quote=jamesbrandon There will alway... (show quote)


This shows how much you know. I never made the statements you just quoted. I never said that the way you are talking about is wrong, in fact I praised you for finding a way that works for you. You are the one who should get your facts straight. You do a good job of labeling and you dont even know me . You say that you dont want to waste your time, too bad because resolving these things is never a waste of time.

Reply
Jun 12, 2012 01:04:06   #
Tina
 
I appreciate the information I've received and would like to say, "thanks." I have read all of your comments and I'm encouraged by your support. I now have a better understanding of the areas that I need to improve upon. I am going to work on those areas and hopefully, that will resolve all of my sharpness issues otherwise, I'll be contacting Canon. For the time being, I think most of the issues are operator related. (LOL) It's nice to know that I'm not in the boat alone. Refreshers, are a must when you're not shooting all the time. And, just listening to other people's perspective and different approach has help to simplify a few concepts for me. Thanks again, Tina

Reply
 
 
Jun 12, 2012 01:08:29   #
Danilo Loc: Las Vegas
 
Granddad wrote:
Sorry it does change. The crop factor on the 7D is 1.6, so on a 200mm lens the real focal length is 320 so you should not have your shutter speed lower than this.


My apologies to both Granddad and FilmFanatic.
A 200mm lens is a 200mm lens, regardless of what you mount the lens on: a full-frame DSLR, a crop sensor DSLR, a 4x5 camera, or an 8x10 camera. It has a singular focal-length and magnification. This characteristic of the 200mm lens can only be changed by optical modification, such as a tele-extender.
On a crop sensor camera, only the "apparent" focal length, or "apparent" magnification is altered. These are laws of physics, and mere mortals, such as us, cannot meddle with them. Our buddy, Google, can lead you to other verifications of these matters.

Reply
Jun 12, 2012 09:28:16   #
kmchenry69 Loc: Lawrenceburg, TN
 
Here is something that I ran across and purchased. It greatly improved my focusing technique (which I had none) my pictures are starting to show improvement.
http://james-brandon.com/tack-sharp-a-step-by-step-guide-to-nailing-focus/

hope it helps,
Dawn[/quote]
Thanks so much, Dawn, for this post. I just learned a lot looking at the 10 page preview. This is a very useful and easy to read.

Reply
Jun 12, 2012 15:35:16   #
PCL92
 
The 7D was purchased about 6 weeks ago. The 7D was new. Remember it took 3 tries before Canon repair got the issue solved. The 7D is a great camera but as everything we buy there are always some quirks or defects in production. I would imagine a refurbished camera would not have the issue, but who did the refurbish, Canon or B+H? I just thought you should look at this possibility since all the other comments were about how to, as if you were doing it wrong!.

Reply
Jun 12, 2012 19:09:06   #
PNagy Loc: Missouri City, Texas
 
kmchenry69 wrote:
Here is something that I ran across and purchased. It greatly improved my focusing technique (which I had none) my pictures are starting to show improvement.
http://james-brandon.com/tack-sharp-a-step-by-step-guide-to-nailing-focus/

hope it helps,
Dawn

Thanks so much, Dawn, for this post. I just learned a lot looking at the 10 page preview. This is a very useful and easy to read.[/quote]

I notice it is selling an E-book. Does that read on ordinary computers? I have a Mac PowerBook 17. Thanks.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.