Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon D7200 worth the upgrade?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Dec 11, 2016 14:10:12   #
Bear2 Loc: Southeast,, MI
 
Royce Moss wrote:
Ok guess that's right to the point. Everybody is saying the 7200 is the way to go.


Me too!

Duane

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 16:52:40   #
Jim Bob
 
Apaflo wrote:
You are describing a valid difference between the D7000 and either the D7100 or the D7200. In terms of dynamic range, high ISO and low light the D7100 and D7200 are virtually the same. The D7200 has a larger memory buffer.


You are incorrect. The 7200 has better dynamic range than the 7100. Not only have I personally observed that fact but it is mentioned in numerous professional reviews as well.

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 17:22:10   #
WessoJPEG Loc: Cincinnati, Ohio
 
Jim Bob wrote:
You are incorrect. The 7200 has better dynamic range than the 7100. Not only have I personally observed that fact but it is mentioned in numerous professional reviews as well.



Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2016 18:23:31   #
jaimeblackwell Loc: Lewiston, Maine
 
Well, I recently upgraded from a 5200 to a 7200 and the difference is night and day. if your used to the 3200, the 7100 would be a great upgrade. If you can go the extra few feet, go for the 7200. they will be releasing a 7300 before you know it and then you will wish you had gone a little farther. That's how i would feel about it anyways. I could have bought the 7100 and save a few bucks but I'm glad I stepped up to the 72. BTW Cameta camera had the refurbished 7200 bodies for 769.00 when I bought mine and they include a one-year warranty. That's the same as new!! Can't beat that with a stick! Good luck with whatever you go with and enjoy!

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 18:30:19   #
Apaflo Loc: Anchorage, Alaska
 
Jim Bob wrote:
You are incorrect. The 7200 has better dynamic range than the 7100. Not only have I personally observed that fact but it is mentioned in numerous professional reviews as well.

Such BS.



Reply
Dec 11, 2016 18:38:02   #
Royce Moss Loc: Irvine, CA
 
Yea, that is what I've seen in my research and the data sheet seems to confirm that.I am pretty sure I'll go with the 7200 over the 7100. I have about a$1000 to spend on a body. I don't need any more lenses right so I'm good. Thanks for the info.

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 18:58:37   #
Jim Bob
 
Apaflo wrote:
Such BS.


Check DXOmark and DPreview and any number of other reviews. You are simply wrong. But that is typical of the misinformation you gratuitously spread in this forum.

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2016 19:08:01   #
Apaflo Loc: Anchorage, Alaska
 
Jim Bob wrote:
Check DXO mark and any number of other reviews. You are simply wrong. But that is typical of the misinformation you spread in this forum.

They all give exactly the same information that Bill Claff's graphs do. Stop making things up and attributing it to others. Show us real facts and figures, not just your summary. So far all we get from you is pure BS.

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 19:49:48   #
Jim Bob
 
Apaflo wrote:
They all give exactly the same information that Bill Claff's graphs do. Stop making things up and attributing it to others. Show us real facts and figures, not just your summary. So far all we get from you is pure BS.


You are obviously mentally challenged or perhaps just an idiot. Read the reviews.

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 19:55:54   #
jaimeblackwell Loc: Lewiston, Maine
 
" I KNOW YOU ARE BUT WHAT AM I" "I KNOW YOU ARE BUT WHAT AM I" Cut it out! You both sound like kids on the playground!

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 19:59:45   #
Jim Bob
 
jaimeblackwell wrote:
" I KNOW YOU ARE BUT WHAT AM I" "I KNOW YOU ARE BUT WHAT AM I" Cut it out! You both sound like kids on the playground!


And you sound like a crotchety old school master-an ugly one at that.

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2016 20:11:18   #
jaimeblackwell Loc: Lewiston, Maine
 
Yup that the little kid mentality I expected in return. I'm sure I'm not the only one laughing at your behavior. Stop wasting people's time with your sorry remarks and demeanor.

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 20:14:14   #
Jim Bob
 
jaimeblackwell wrote:
Yup that the little kid mentality I expected in return. I'm sure I'm not the only one laughing at your behavior. Stop wasting people's time with your sorry remarks and demeanor.


Yes mam.

Reply
Dec 12, 2016 09:44:04   #
Royce Moss Loc: Irvine, CA
 
Really guys, let's not get into a pissy fight over advice! I just wanted to know about experiences with both cameras. I can see all the different reviews and take each one with a grain of salt and go with who I think is the the best. So far I am trusting Tom Hogan the most and try and stay away from Rockwell even though I have read all his stuff and and think he is sincere. His reviews to me sound to generalized. But thanks for your info.

Reply
Dec 12, 2016 09:53:03   #
WessoJPEG Loc: Cincinnati, Ohio
 
Royce Moss wrote:
Really guys, let's not get into a pissy fight over advice! I just wanted to know about experiences with both cameras. I can see all the different reviews and take each one with a grain of salt and go with who I think is the the best. So far I am trusting Tom Hogan the most and try and stay away from Rockwell even though I have read all his stuff and and think he is sincere. His reviews to me sound to generalized. But thanks for your info.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.