Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

"The outgoing president will leave the GOP with historic control of government at every level"

"Make no mistake about the historical significance. Obama’s two terms surpassed the losses of past two-term presidents in modern history."

"It’s clear that post-Obama, the Democrats must worry about their future with a decimated bench of future candidates after massive losses at the state level."

“These new state-level leaders are part of the approximately 900 state legislative seats that Democrats have lost in the Obama era,”

"Neither Carville nor Obama expected the president would fundamentally transform America in an unintended way — massively expanding the Republican Party. No doubt, Donald Trump’s victories in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan — states Republicans haven’t won since the 1980s — were at least in part due to Obama’s last eight years.:" <<< NOW THIS IS HILARIOUS!

During Obama’s term, a total of 35 state legislative chambers flipped to Republicans after the GOP picked up chambers in Kentucky, Iowa and Minnesota this year, according to tallies announced by the RSLC. But, after taking some losses, Republicans hold 68 of the 99 state legislative chambers in the country."

"Obama can’t blame unfriendly maps on the loss of 13 Democratic U.S. Senate seats and 14 governorships during his presidency."

https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/obama-leaves-democratic-party-in-shambles/

John_F Loc: Minneapolis, MN

You can certain that every facet in every State of this past election will be under a high power microscope. When the DNC appoints Keith Ellison you know they will be deasly serious - for when are you always turn to a Minnesotan. The central questions are two mainly: why did so many plain working guys desert their self interests; why did so many people absent the polls. There are a few quicky answers to these two, but they are superficial and misleading. I voted for Hillary but was disappointed with her campaign. She never made clear what problems faced the nation; what she would put forward as solutions; how flexible she would be as facts changed. I even went to her campaign web looking for her white papers. There were some but somewhat formulaic.
Will jobs come back. Remember when Youngstown and steel were all over the campaign - what nobody told was the metallurgy of iron and steelmaking has changed. The country with the latest metallurgy is the Netherlands and its process like several others can not use taconite pellets, sorry Minnesota.

Put it all together and hope you don't get wiped out, for there will be lossers.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

I'm not sure what this has to do with Obama Leaving the Democratic Party in Shambles, please help my ignorance of understanding your point.

ken hubert Loc: Missouri

I like your post. You clearly show how low intelligence voters like you persistently vote for douchebags like Hillary and that POS muslim Ellison even though you admit that she didn't know the problems in our country and didn’t have any solutions. Just the same tired ,old, clichés that Libturds have been spouting for decades. Your lunacy couldn't be shown any clearer.
Thank You!!!

FlyingTiger Loc: Tortola, BVI

So you think that if the Democrats appoint Keith Ellison to run the DNC they are "serious"? You know, I agree with you. If they do appoint Rep Ellison it will prove beyond any doubt that they are "serious" about finishing off what little is left of the Democrat party. Should be fun to watch.

As for the remainder of your post, it is very difficult to make any sense of it.

K2mbs Loc: Southern Tier of, NY

"She never made clear what problems faced the nation; what she would put forward as solutions; how flexible she would be as facts changed. I even went to her campaign web looking for her white papers. There were some but somewhat formulaic."

Your mistake John was assuming that Hillary Clinton actually had deeply thought out solutions for America at any point.
The woman had desire to acquire the most powerful position known to man.
This in addition to all of the money she has already amassed through the Clinton's pay-to-play corruption would be the final puzzle piece to her lifelong quest.
She had shown for her entire political existence that she was inept at best, and plainly on the wrong side of virtually every issue.
The entirety of her campaign was to sabotage Donald Trumps campaign through slander and character assassination, thus making her appear the lesser of two evils...Thats it!...
Nothing more substantive than that really.
In that process she used the colluding media to cover her shortcomings as fast as they could figure out how to put band-aids all over a Swiss cheese looking ship.
The flood of information coming out showing what a horrid human beings the entire democrat party, and state run media truly are was too much to quell.
Post election.....We who now have vast, literal proof of all the criminal behavior should never go quietly assuming the evidence alone will change everything...
In this age all is forgotten within days as people move on.
Democrat opposition must continue to point out for the next 4 years what had truly taken place during this disgraceful democrat campaign.
This kind of sickening ideological outright corruption should never happen again, but it will as long as there is accomplices willing to sell out journalism to be a member of "the establishment"

4uiprnt Loc: Iowa

.....We who now have vast, literal proof of all the criminal behavior should never go quietly assuming the evidence alone will change everything...
In this age all is forgotten within days as people move on.
Democrat opposition must continue to point out for the next 4 years what had truly taken place during this disgraceful democrat campaign.
This kind of sickening ideological outright corruption should never happen again, but it will as long as there is accomplices willing to sell out journalism to be a member of "the establishment"[/quote]