Here's the proof that at least 4 Wisconsin precincts were padding the votes for Trump. This is public record and easy to verify. So far, 3 separate counties in Wisconsin have admitted doing this, totaling about 5,000 votes for Trump that they have subsequently removed, shrinking Trump's lead in Wisconsin from the original 27,257 as reported on November 8, down to 22,525 as revised on November 16. Let's look at just one county to see the shenanigans that were going on there:
A county in Wisconsin named Outagamie County had four precincts in the areas of Cicero, Grand Chute, Bear Creek, and Hortonville which all showed that they had fewer people overall than had voted in the presidential election. This instance naturally created quite a stir when people found out, with many claiming, rightly, that fraud was taking place.
The precincts quickly adjusted their voting totals, which removed over a thousand votes from Donald Trump’s side.You can see the Grand Chute 1-3 results here. All 1126 extra votes were for Trump. Clinton’s total stayed the same.
Here are the original totals reported on November 8
Here are the revised totals reported on November 16Same deal in Hortonville. Trump’s number down by 400+ votes, Clinton’s unchanged. Ballots cast now matches votes counted.
Here are the original totals reported on November 8. The numbers display that in 3 precincts in Outagamie County, all won by DT, more votes were counted for President than cast:
Here are the revised totals reported on November 16The village clerk of Hortonville - Lynn Mischkerm - offered an explanation to the discrepancy, which didn’t make much sense at the time and under further analysis was proved to be a falsehood.
Here's what she said (
http://wbay.com/2016/11/22/discrepancies-in-unofficial-outagamie-county-election-results-explained/amp/):
In order to give election returns to the Outagamie County Clerk’s office as quickly as possible the Chief Inspector added together the votes from the election machine tapes. An error was made while keying the numbers on the calculator during this process resulting in an incorrect number of votes reported on Election night. The official process of tallying the votes was completed and rechecked. These vote numbers were recorded and delivered to the Outagamie County Clerk’s office the morning of November 9th. The official tally reflects the accurate votes in the Village.To accept this story from Mischkerm, one would have to believe that the same error was made in four different counties, and that same error resulted in Donald Trump receiving more votes in each instance. Another conundrum is Hillary Clinton’s vote total did not change before the original numbers were announced, or after they were adjusted due to the Internet’s outrage.
And the scandal continues to grow as more revisions come in throughout the state. So far a total of nearly five thousand Trump votes in Wisconsin have now been taken off the official board because they apparently never existed to begin with. (see the Palmer Report:
http://www.palmerreport.com/news/ahead-of-recount-wisconsin-has-already-wiped-out-5000-phony-votes-for-donald-trump/234/)
Even ahead of the forthcoming recount in Wisconsin, Donald Trump’s lead has already shrunk to just 22,525 votes from the originally reported 27,257. That means 18% of his “lead” has already vanished, based on precincts catching some of their own incorrect numbers, and internet gawkers catching others. Another thing that jumps out is that the revisions have served to erase thousands of votes from Trump, while affirming that Clinton’s vote total was essentially correct to begin with.
So, Donald Trump has gone from originally having 1,409,467 votes to now having just 1,404,536 votes in Wisconsin.
In other words, a total of 4,931 votes were reported for Trump on election night that never existed. In contrast Hillary Clinton has gone from 1,382,210 votes down to 1,382,011 votes, a difference of less than two hundred votes. In other words, Wisconsin essentially had Clinton’s vote total correct all along, but is now acknowledging that nearly five thousand of the supposed votes for Trump simply never existed. Where did these votes come from? Who originally padded his numbers and how? If this was indeed due to an organized effort to pad Trump’s voting totals in various precincts across the state, the recount should fully expose it.
The point to take away from this entire voting debacle in these little Wisconsin towns is that electoral fraud was uncovered because they lazily attempted to give Trump an edge and did not anticipate their villainy being discovered. In other areas of the nation it is entirely possible that similar scenarios transpired, and the individuals involved were smoother in covering their tracks.