Fidel Castro Dead at 90
Nov 27, 2016 21:48:39 #
crissx09 wrote:
I have a very good idea of what communism is and I do not like any piece of it BUT apparently you don't know or you forgot how the people of Cuba had it before Castro.
Oh work! SteveR lecturing anyone on communism, or anything else for that matter!
Nov 27, 2016 21:55:45 #
PNagy wrote:
Oh work! SteveR lecturing anyone on communism, or anything else for that matter!
I don't lecture anyone. But I lived under communism for 24 years. I could lecture, but not people like you.
Nov 27, 2016 21:56:37 #
PNagy wrote:
Reasonable newsmen are reporting that North Korea is developing the ability to hit the U.S. with nuclear missiles. Maybe not a threat today, but a very feasible threat soon.Not really. It's more like if you pretend North Korea is a threat to us, you are a jingoist moron.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-17399847
Nov 27, 2016 21:57:00 #
crissx09 wrote:
I have a very good idea of what communism is and I do not like any piece of it BUT apparently you don't know or you forgot how the people of Cuba had it before Castro.
With this I am not saying they were better off with Castro neither.....they tread heavy government corruption and social decay for a dictatorship. What is worst..? I am not sure.
With this I am not saying they were better off with Castro neither.....they tread heavy government corruption and social decay for a dictatorship. What is worst..? I am not sure.
Probably not enough. Actually, I am sure.
Nov 27, 2016 22:20:24 #
Steve_m wrote:
I don't lecture anyone. But I lived under communism for 24 years. I could lecture, but not people like you.
Right; you could not lecture me, though you lived under communism for the same reason that an ordinary g.i. who fought in the Korean War could not lecture a professor who did not.
Nov 27, 2016 22:23:45 #
rehess wrote:
Reasonable newsmen are reporting that North Korea is developing the ability to hit the U.S. with nuclear missiles. Maybe not a threat today, but a very feasible threat soon.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-17399847
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-17399847
So what? We have been able to hit them for decades. Does that justify any country or coalition of them either to bully us into disarming, or to invade us? We have used atomic weapons on humans, but they have not.
Nov 27, 2016 22:42:52 #
PNagy wrote:
Not really. It's more like if you pretend North Korea is a threat to us, you are a jingoist moron.
PNagy wrote:
The U.S. does not regularly threaten North Korea. North Korea does regularly threaten the U.S. and all of North Korea's neighbors. So what? We have been able to hit them for decades. Does that justify any country or coalition of them either to bully us into disarming, or to invade us? We have used atomic weapons on humans, but they have not.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-22/north-korea-claims-success-in-launch-of-mid-range-missile
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/03/26/north-korea-propaganda-video-depicts-nuclear-attack-washington/82293486/
Only a "jingoist moron" would ignore those threats.
Maybe they'll lob one intended for DC and it'll land in Texas instead.
Nov 27, 2016 22:59:36 #
rehess wrote:
The U.S. does not regularly threaten North Korea. ... (show quote)
Oh yeah; that is a real possibility. It would never even hit the target. Then the entire country would be destroyed. Besides,you haven't explained why the rest of the world should not united to attack us and take away our atomic warheads. We have thousands of them. As I stated; you are a moronic jingoist.
Nov 27, 2016 23:02:03 #
Nov 27, 2016 23:06:12 #
Nov 27, 2016 23:08:43 #
"united to attack us," rather than "unite"? Mistaking SteveR for Steve_m, and numerous other typos that PNagy has made recently. Is this the same PNagy that started the infamous thread about the importance of correct English on UHH a few years ago?
I fear that Nagy is joining the rest of us morons.
Will somebody remove the pole from his posterior?
I fear that Nagy is joining the rest of us morons.
Will somebody remove the pole from his posterior?
Nov 27, 2016 23:38:48 #
PNagy wrote:
Wrong. I look at the facts. You fling accusations around. As I stated; you are a moronic jingoist.
PNagy wrote:
Fact: the only time the U.S. used atomic weapons on humans was to end a war which the U.S. did not start; at the time, facts available to the U.S. President indicated that the alternative was an invasion which would kill more Japanese than the bomb did. We have used atomic weapons on humans, but they have not.
PNagy wrote:
Fact: No one claims significantly more power for a North Korean bomb than what the U.S. did use in 1945; two of those failed to destroy Japan, which is much smaller than the U.S.Oh yeah; that is a real possibility. It would never even hit the target. Then the entire country would be destroyed.
PNagy wrote:
Fact: No one has ever made a motion in the U.N to take away our nuclear warheads {as far as I know, the U.S. no longer stockpiles atomic warheads}. North Korea is under U.N. mandate to stop their march to atomic weapons. Maybe world leaders know something about comparative risk that you don't.Besides,you haven't explained why the rest of the world should not united to attack us and take away our atomic warheads. We have thousands of them.
Nov 27, 2016 23:48:00 #
PNagy wrote:
Oh work! SteveR lecturing anyone on communism, or anything else for that matter!
SteveR is a lot more intelligent than YOU are!
Nov 28, 2016 00:24:32 #
Nov 28, 2016 00:41:56 #
Nagy: We have used atomic weapons on humans, but they have not.
SteveR: Fact: the only time the U.S. used atomic weapons on humans was to end a war which the U.S. did not start; at the time, facts available to the U.S. President indicated that the alternative was an invasion which would kill more Japanese than the bomb did.
Nagy: Steve you are one spectacular moron. Here you are listing excuses for something the US did that was so deprived no other country has done it. Do you really think the garbage you write refutes anything just because you wrote it.
SteveR: Fact: the only time the U.S. used atomic weapons on humans was to end a war which the U.S. did not start; at the time, facts available to the U.S. President indicated that the alternative was an invasion which would kill more Japanese than the bomb did.
Nagy: Steve you are one spectacular moron. Here you are listing excuses for something the US did that was so deprived no other country has done it. Do you really think the garbage you write refutes anything just because you wrote it.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.