Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Everyday or "walk around" lens - Nikon
Page <<first <prev 5 of 9 next> last>>
Nov 16, 2016 08:36:21   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
Leitz wrote:
Yet appropriate to the question!


Not appropriate. The task at hand is something specific. Walk around is not specific. It is variable. So your response was dumb and meaningless and a poor attempt at being a smartass.

Reply
Nov 16, 2016 08:37:11   #
RogerO
 
I use the DX18-200mm 1:3.5-5.6 GII ED with VR on the D7100. Its range covers most situations and the price is good.

Reply
Nov 16, 2016 08:38:10   #
twillsol Loc: St. Louis, MO
 
BBurkett wrote:
Hi all!

I currently have the AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm F3.5-5.6G ED VR on my D7100 and not really pleased with the results I get with it.

What is your favorite everyday ro "walk around" lens?

Thanks,
Bob


24-120 f4 , great walk-around lens, on my D500 or D800

Reply
 
 
Nov 16, 2016 08:44:05   #
DaveHam Loc: Reading UK
 
To walk around what, where? Indoors? Outdoors? There is no one lens fits all purposes.

Reply
Nov 16, 2016 08:48:27   #
Bear2 Loc: Southeast,, MI
 
BBurkett wrote:
Hi all!

I currently have the AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm F3.5-5.6G ED VR on my D7100 and not really pleased with the results I get with it.

What is your favorite everyday ro "walk around" lens?

Thanks,
Bob


Nikkor 18-200 VR ll, was on my D7000 for a year or so. Now it is on my D7200.
Great lens.

Duane

Reply
Nov 16, 2016 09:02:02   #
starlifter Loc: Towson, MD
 
Hi. Some of the people on this site seem to be lacking in social skills, so you never know what kind of answers you'll get. I think its a perfectly simple question. After all a " walking" around lens is just that a walking around lens that you hope will cover most photo oportunties you might encounter in a normal day. I have a d7200 and I use a Nikko 18 to 200 that works put nicely while I leave the 150-600 in the car just in case.

Reply
Nov 16, 2016 09:02:46   #
DaveyDitzer Loc: Western PA
 
I have used my Nikon 16-80 f2.8/4 for several months on my D5300 and I like the results so far - Except the factory supplied lens hood vignettes at 16mm.

Reply
 
 
Nov 16, 2016 09:11:58   #
mikewskier Loc: NE Florida
 
I use a Tamron 16-300 VR DX. It serves well and resolves the issues others have brought up regarding what you shoot. It focuses well and with my D7000 the max aperture has not been a problem.
I have other lenses for special conditions.

Reply
Nov 16, 2016 09:23:34   #
BBurkett
 
Thanks to all for all the comments! Very much appreciated! Number of responses is great!

I think I need to clarify:

I am looking for other choices (Nikon or even perhaps non-Nikon) for a lens in the 16-85 zoom range as that is what works best for me most of the time.
I have an 80-200 f2.8 Nikon that fills in the top end of what I want.

PS - legs are not necessary on a walk-around lens for me as I have 2 good ones!

Thanks again!

Reply
Nov 16, 2016 09:28:49   #
prossiter Loc: Newfoundland. Canada
 
My favorite is the 18-200 3.5-5.6 DX.

Reply
Nov 16, 2016 09:32:11   #
dcampbell52 Loc: Clearwater Fl
 
I think part of the problem here is that a "walk around" lens means different things to different photographers depending on what they shoot. If I am out "birding" my walk around lens is an 80-400mm lens (heavy but is a full fame lens that gives good results on both ff and crop sensor cameras. But since I am "birding", I probably don't need wide to short telephoto shots. If I am shooting seascapes, sunsets or general landscape, I probably will have the 10-24mm in my pocket, an 18-70mm on the crop sensor camera or a 50mm f/1.4 on the D610. If I am shooting buildings, people or general stuff I probably would have the 18-70 and the 70-300 or maybe the 80-400 (but it is a little obtrusive for walking the streets and too slow and too long for inside buildings without supporting light. Like everything else in photography, the "walkaround" lens is a matter of choice and probable subjects. I don't rely on one "all inclusive" lens like the 18-300 or 28-300mm lenses because, while the lenses are excellent for outside photography, they tend to be a little slow once you move indoors. I probably would throw my 50mm into a pocket because it is light, fairly small and has great low light ability (f/1.4) and is still fast enough in the mid aperture f/8 for good indoor shooting.

Reply
 
 
Nov 16, 2016 09:37:35   #
MtnMan Loc: ID
 
BBurkett wrote:
I do not expect to upgrade to FX, but one never knows. I do have several Nikon FX lenses, 50mm f1.8, 60mm f2.8 macro and 80-200 f2.8 all non-vr; the 80-200 definitely gives me the most satisfying results.

The biggest part of my shooting fits best to the 16-85 or so range.

I am curious about other's experience with non-Nikon lenses, in the 16-85 or so range, as I have always stayed with Nikon.

I very much appreciate your opinion.


I like the Sigma 17-50 on my D5300.

24-80 on my D800. But the D800 doesn't get far from my pickup due to weight.

Both have VR, which I consider essential as walkaround sometimes involves indoors.

Reply
Nov 16, 2016 09:45:00   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
dcampbell52 wrote:
I think part of the problem here is that a "walk around" lens means different things to different photographers depending on what they shoot. If I am out "birding" my walk around lens is an 80-400mm lens (heavy but is a full fame lens that gives good results on both ff and crop sensor cameras. But since I am "birding", I probably don't need wide to short telephoto shots. If I am shooting seascapes, sunsets or general landscape, I probably will have the 10-24mm in my pocket, an 18-70mm on the crop sensor camera or a 50mm f/1.4 on the D610. If I am shooting buildings, people or general stuff I probably would have the 18-70 and the 70-300 or maybe the 80-400 (but it is a little obtrusive for walking the streets and too slow and too long for inside buildings without supporting light. Like everything else in photography, the "walkaround" lens is a matter of choice and probable subjects. I don't rely on one "all inclusive" lens like the 18-300 or 28-300mm lenses because, while the lenses are excellent for outside photography, they tend to be a little slow once you move indoors. I probably would throw my 50mm into a pocket because it is light, fairly small and has great low light ability (f/1.4) and is still fast enough in the mid aperture f/8 for good indoor shooting.
I think part of the problem here is that a "w... (show quote)


So there you have it. The 50mm is probably the best walk around lens. All of the other situations you describe are specific needs situations.

Reply
Nov 16, 2016 09:52:52   #
digit-up Loc: Flushing, Michigan
 
Leitz wrote:
Yet appropriate to the question!


And yet so condescending and judgmental. Who Da hell are you to say.....much of anything?? RJM.

Reply
Nov 16, 2016 10:07:16   #
KathyCaruthers
 
I asked that same question to the Senior Photographer on Carnival cruise line and he suggested Nikon 18-200. I got it and love it! No more constant switching lenses.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.