Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Epson
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
Nov 14, 2016 09:17:02   #
Madman Loc: Gulf Coast, Florida USA
 
jimmya wrote:
I'm considering replacing my Canon printer (fairly new). Reason? Well I spent about $120 or so on the printer about 1 year ago and have already spent more than that on ink. I don't print many photos but the ink just goes away... cleaning I suppose.

Who here has/had experience with Epson? I know they are a good brand but I've never used them. What kind of experience do you have to share.

Thanks folks.



I purchased a refurbished Epson Photo Stylus 1400 directly from Epson several years ago - about the time that it was being replaced by the 1430. It has been extremely reliable and given me great quality prints. I use Epson paper that I purchase when they offer the 40% discount. For ink, I bought re-fillable cartridges and bulk ink. No problems there either.

Just as important as the quality of the machine is the customer service provided by the manufacturer and Epson is one of the best. Call with a question and you will get the information needed. In fact, you may get more help than you need or expect. When I received my printer, I opened the box and began perusing the literature that came with it. It came with software discs but I wasn't sure that they were compatible with my computer. I called Epson and the young man that I was speaking with asked if my computer was online. I said yes and he said he would send me the correct and updated software and drivers. Great, I thought I would go ahead and finish the job of setting up the machine myself after receiving the downloads. I thanked the gentleman and was going to hang up. No, he says, stay on the phone with me and we'll make sure the printer is operating correctly. I explained that the printer was still in the box. He says that's okay, I'm going to be with you until it is set up and you have made two test prints. That level of service impresses me. And on the rare occasion that I have called them, the service has been the same every time.

I would definitely recommend Epson, if I ever need to replace mine, it will be with another Epson.

I just remembered that I did buy another Epson, a small all-in-one for my father. It, too, has performed flawlessly.

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 09:50:41   #
u1003074 Loc: Goshen, New York
 
I've used both Epson and Canon over many years. I have found that the Canon printers are much more reliable--you don't have the constant problem of ink head clogs with Canon that Epson has. Cleaning the ink heads uses up gobs of ink.

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 10:40:17   #
SusanFromVermont Loc: Southwest corner of Vermont
 
jimmya wrote:
I'm considering replacing my Canon printer (fairly new). Reason? Well I spent about $120 or so on the printer about 1 year ago and have already spent more than that on ink. I don't print many photos but the ink just goes away... cleaning I suppose...

You do not say which Canon printer you have, but in general they are excellent printers. Have also owned other brands, including Epson, over the years, and was happy with them. My current printer is a Canon MX70 which does a great job. But you get what you pay for - buy an inexpensive printer, use it for photos, and it will use a lot of ink. Gets expensive with the small ink cartridges.

If you want to do a little research and comparison, that might help. Look at them on a website like B&H where you can see the specifications as well as the prices. Red River Paper also has done a lot of printer reviews which are quite good, so that would be a good place to start.

Reply
 
 
Nov 14, 2016 10:45:19   #
don646
 
go to ink products.com check out their ink .... been using their ink and refill ink cartridge for 10 years never had any problems
I think you will be well pleased

DON

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 11:01:14   #
rdgreenwood Loc: Kennett Square, Pennsylvania
 
When my beloved R1800 Stylus Epson died after about 7 years, I replaced it with a SureColor P600. It's an amazing machine. I print one or two images a week on it; it never gives me any trouble. It seems to be better on ink--proving a point made earlier about the advantage of larger capacity cartridges--and gives gorgeous results. I also like the fact that it immediately installed itself wirelessly. It's a dream machine. (I think I said that earlier, but I do love this printer.)

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 11:05:00   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
I have also been very happy with Epson printers and have had many models over the years, including one Bill mentioned, the 4000 which was a fantastic printer. I am currently using a P800 and am also very happy. I have always TRIED to print at least one 8x10 every week and to not let the printer sit idle for longer than that. Non-use caused the death of my 4000, and I will not let that happen again. I find that I do enjoy the entire process of both selecting and printing several photos every week. In today's digital world it is a breath of fresh air to hold something more analog like a print. Epson's P400 and P600 also would seem to be excellent choices for less money although if you will be doing any printing volume, the P800 will save in the long run. I won't even consider using anything but OEM inks for a wide variety of reasons. The ink cost of the P800 is more than acceptable to me. Best of luck.

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 11:44:07   #
jethro'spal Loc: Oklahoma
 
I replaced an HP with Epson about 2-3 years ago and have been very pleased with the results. Be sure to use their Ultra Premium paper for photograph prints. The ink is relatively expensive but be sure to use the High Capacity cartridges for some cost savings.

Reply
 
 
Nov 14, 2016 11:46:13   #
bigwolf40 Loc: Effort, Pa.
 
tainkc wrote:
I don't know what to tell you because you are going to get all sorts of opinions on this, but here is my take: I have been using Epson printers for over 20 years without much problem. I had one dry up on me once from non usage, but that was remedied easily. I have always used 6 colour machines. I have not had to buy many because of their reliability. I simply wore them out. I am using two of them right now. One strictly for photo printing and the other for text, scanning and CD covers.

When the original ink runs out, I do use 3rd party inks with no problems; no fading, no running, no mismatch of colours - again with no problems. I have been using the same supplier for 20 years also. I refill my own with no mess and it comes out to about 33 cents per cartridge. I use paper that I purchase from Costco because it is made by Epson. I save money there also. I can not tell you about the large format printers though since I have never used or owned one.

Tom
I don't know what to tell you because you are goin... (show quote)


I have Epson so I would like to know which 3rd party inks do you use and their link. Thanks....Rich

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 11:52:16   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
cjc2 wrote:
I have also been very happy with Epson printers and have had many models over the years, including one Bill mentioned, the 4000 which was a fantastic printer. I am currently using a P800 and am also very happy. I have always TRIED to print at least one 8x10 every week and to not let the printer sit idle for longer than that. Non-use caused the death of my 4000, and I will not let that happen again. I find that I do enjoy the entire process of both selecting and printing several photos every week. In today's digital world it is a breath of fresh air to hold something more analog like a print. Epson's P400 and P600 also would seem to be excellent choices for less money although if you will be doing any printing volume, the P800 will save in the long run. I won't even consider using anything but OEM inks for a wide variety of reasons. The ink cost of the P800 is more than acceptable to me. Best of luck.
I have also been very happy with Epson printers an... (show quote)


Our Epson 4000 died from lack of use, too. Our 9600, 9800, and 9880 were used constantly. The 4000 was used for batch printing of odd-sized panoramas, which we seldom had to make. It sat idle too much... After two service calls, we just gave it away in working condition. The folks we gave it to let it die from lack of use.

Fortunately, the P-series has anti-clog coated heads! They're quite reliable. But the old caveat, "If you don't use it, you lose it" probably still applies.

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 12:02:27   #
Madman Loc: Gulf Coast, Florida USA
 
bigwolf40 wrote:
I have Epson so I would like to know which 3rd party inks do you use and their link. Thanks....Rich



I realize that your question wasn't directed to me, but I recommend and use inks and cartridges from cobraink.com.

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 12:02:44   #
Picture Taker Loc: Michigan Thumb
 
I don't know how deep you want to go in to costs of a printer. But the Epson 1400 series has been good to me. I use the Epson 1440 now. I was using the 1400 but went to the 1440 as it is not hard wired and now I print from my Mac my wife's Windows machine as well as my laptop from the back yard. Not that expensive.

Reply
 
 
Nov 14, 2016 12:09:03   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
bigwolf40 wrote:
I have Epson so I would like to know which 3rd party inks do you use and their link. Thanks....Rich


Mmmm, let's see, reduced cost of ink vs. increased risk of printer downtime for repair...

Or, reduced cost of ink vs. probable need to create custom ICC profiles to get good color from third party inks...

Or, reduced cost of ink vs. increased risk of print fading because the third party inks have less stable dyes or pigments...

There are good reasons why professionals use OEM inks in Canon and Epson printers. It is generally easiest and safest to stay within the printer manufacturer's walled garden of paper and ink options. Once you climb out, there are many variables to control. The Biggie: Do you have a custom ICC profile for your printer and the particular ink set and paper surface you use? If not, what you see on the monitor is most likely NOT what you get on the print!

You don't buy an inkjet photo printer to save money! You buy it for:

• Personal, local control over the output's appearance
• Confidentiality, when that is important
• Convenience of "on demand" printing
• Archival image permanence
• Maximum available range of printable substrates (papers, canvas, board...)
• Maximum color gamut reproduction
• Studio proofing

The larger the print, the more the cost of inkjet output compares favorably with photo labs, assuming you know what you are doing with color management and safe print handling.

All that said, if you work with a professional printers-and-printing-supplies company, you may be able to find a reliable source for third party inking systems. Just be sure you understand what you are getting into before you make the conversion. There are good CISS systems and truly awful ones. There are decent ink sets and really bad ink sets, too.

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 12:33:52   #
bigwolf40 Loc: Effort, Pa.
 
burkphoto wrote:
Mmmm, let's see, reduced cost of ink vs. increased risk of printer downtime for repair...

Or, reduced cost of ink vs. probable need to create custom ICC profiles to get good color from third party inks...

Or, reduced cost of ink vs. increased risk of print fading because the third party inks have less stable dyes or pigments...

There are good reasons why professionals use OEM inks in Canon and Epson printers. It is generally easiest and safest to stay within the printer manufacturer's walled garden of paper and ink options. Once you climb out, there are many variables to control. The Biggie: Do you have a custom ICC profile for your printer and the particular ink set and paper surface you use? If not, what you see on the monitor is most likely NOT what you get on the print!

You don't buy an inkjet photo printer to save money! You buy it for:
• Personal, local control over the output's appearance
• Confidentiality, when that is important
• Convenience of "on demand" printing
• Archival image permanence
• Maximum available range of printable substrates (papers, canvas, board...)
• Maximum color gamut reproduction
• Studio proofing

The larger the print, the more the cost of inkjet output compares favorably with photo labs, assuming you know what you are doing with color management and safe print handling.

All that said, if you work with a professional printers-and-printing-supplies company, you may be able to find a reliable source for third party inking systems. Just be sure you understand what you are getting into before you make the conversion. There are good CISS systems and truly awful ones. There are decent ink sets and really bad ink sets, too.
Mmmm, let's see, reduced cost of ink vs. increased... (show quote)


Thank you for your input....Rich

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 12:35:03   #
bigwolf40 Loc: Effort, Pa.
 
Madman wrote:
I realize that your question wasn't directed to me, but I recommend and use inks and cartridges from cobraink.com.


Thank you for your suggestion...Rich

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 12:37:45   #
gary robertson Loc: Now living in Sandpont Idaho, from So. Cal
 
I have a Epson EY-4550 which uses the bottles of ink as opposed to the cartridges and it does a great job for me. A refill is a fraction of the cost and you get about a 1/2 pint of ink for less than $15 on line. I used to spend at least a $150 per month now less than $10.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.