Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Your experience or knoledge of Nikon 200-500mm lens.
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Oct 18, 2016 15:57:57   #
Warbird Loc: Sweden
 
Vince68 wrote:
I didn't say they gave it a spectacular review, just that they reviewed it, and also that I always read the gear reviews there because they are honest and tell you whats good, as well as whats not so good. Hence their review sentence "I would say most of the time, autofocus is fairly good for tracking birds in flight." Pretty straight forward I would say, not sugar coating it at all and telling you whats not so good. Its up to the reader then to make a determination after that. After reading reviews from Pros, it is always a good idea to get feedback from actual owners of a piece of equipment, thats for sure. Your initial response to the OP on this lens was what was posted on DPReview. I gave a website that reviewed the lens, and pointed out things not so good, which is what someone purchasing gear would want to know.
I didn't say they gave it a spectacular review, ju... (show quote)


Ok, then I misunderstood you, I am truly sorry for that!

But as I also said earlier that all of the new tele zooms are good, very good. Much better than the "old" Sigma 50-500 and 150-500.
Is the Nikon 200-500mm a good lens? Absolutely!
Is it the best? I do not believe it is, but to be fair, OP did not ask for that. :-)

Reply
Oct 18, 2016 16:02:16   #
leftyD500 Loc: Ocala, Florida
 
FoxT wrote:
I'm considering a Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR lens for use on my Nikon D610 and would greatly appreciate any input on the lens. Will be using it for wildlife shots in the rocky mts and grandkids sports. The grandkids are playing on much larger fields now so 300mm just isn't quite enough.


I shoot with that lens on my D610, and it is a dynamic combo! When out shooting birds or other wildlife, I shoot in manual, shutter speed at 1/500 sec, aperture set at f5.6, and ISO to auto, and am able to get extremely sharp shots hand held. I see no need to get a teleconverter, I don't have one, so I cannot comment on it. The only mistake you will make in getting that lens is waiting too long to get it!

Reply
Oct 19, 2016 01:21:54   #
Vince68 Loc: Wappingers Falls, NY
 
No problem Warbird. I just wanted to make sure that I wasn't giving you or anyone else the impression they gave it a 5 Star rating. I always read their gear reviews, as well as a few other websites. Then I try to find actual user reviews to see how others like that gear.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.