I was shooting in this big neat house with one model when a model who was working with another photographer wandered over and joined us for a few minutes. Two pics. I know that these are not "classic" nudes" or classic nude poses. Shot with Canon 5DII and 24-105/4L lens and Photoflex lights.
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
"I have a dream..."
And it looks like yours came true, even if the "happy ending" was only a few photos.
Well done.
AntonioReyna wrote:
I was shooting in this big neat house with one model when a model who was working with another photographer wandered over and joined us for a few minutes. Two pics. I know that these are not "classic" nudes" or classic nude poses. Shot with Canon 5DII and 24-105/4L lens and Photoflex lights.
Antonio, looks like a case of double trouble to me!
I love Lizzie(that's an adj. not a verb!) but her friend is nice two. And you left just enough room between them for me to sneak in there!! LoL
Not sure what a Classic nude is? Maybe cliche poses. Can't imagine shooting two in a bathroom. Bet you're a lot closer to 24 than 105?!
Very nice shot of two VERY lovely ladies!! Nice job.
What are Photoflex lights? I think I see a hint of an Octo in the back.
But hey, with all those mirrors and I still don't see you!! LoL
SS
When I shot these images, I used to use constant lights which I believe were Photoflex, but then later switched to Alien Bee strobes. This was a super big, very nice house and the bathroom was huge, with a very large bathtub, in which the models are standing. One image at 58mm and one at 73mm. Either way, very close. The model on the left I shot many times and the Asian model just for those few minutes that she wandered into our area.
I remember shooting portraits with "fotofloods".
We're talking(I guess), temp balanced tungsten, or something like that. They were the BOMB in those days for me!!! LoL
SS
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
Antonio, you are confusing us.
You posted "Chula" on Sep 14, but she was a blonde.
You posted "Chula-II-In the Shower" on Sep 16, a dark-haired beauty with a tattoo just above the right thigh.
You posted "Chula-II-Mirror" on Sep 16 with the same dark-haired beauty, I believe (could not see the tat due to the green wrap).
You posted "Lizzie and Amiga" today (Sep 20) with the same dark-haired beauty on the left (see the tat?).
So, is she Lizzie, or Chula???
I can sort-of understand getting flustered in the presence of naked beauty, but as a professional you should keep your ladies' names straight... if not for yourself, then do it for us.
AntonioReyna wrote:
I was shooting in this big neat house with one model when a model who was working with another photographer wandered over and joined us for a few minutes. Two pics. I know that these are not "classic" nudes" or classic nude poses. Shot with Canon 5DII and 24-105/4L lens and Photoflex lights.
Any photo of beautiful nude ladies is a classic.
nice shots, on the second one, i'd have had them looking at each other.
Liz or Lizzie is the name of the brunette model that first shows up as Chula II. Chula in Spanish means beautiful and I shoot under the name of Chula Vista, meaning beautiful view (also name of city south of San Diego near the border). So these models, to me, are all Chulas. Sorry about any confusion. Keep shooting.
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
AntonioReyna wrote:
This is Liz.
Gracias for clearing up my confusion. I see, I now know, and I fully agree that Liz is Chula.
JohnFrim wrote:
Gracias for clearing up my confusion. I see, I now know, and I fully agree that Liz is Chula.
LoL, John, that's funny, next you're gonna ask, "then who's Amiga?!?!" LoL
Yes, in my book, they're All named "Chulesa"!!!
SS
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
OK, I'll take a shot a Spanish before I look it up on Google Translate. Lizzie was with "a friend", but both are "chula", right?
Honestly?
I do not see why a paid model would be walking in another photographer's set and have her picture taken with the second guy. That does not make any sense at all.
Just my thoughts.
Rongnongno wrote:
Honestly?
I do not see why a paid model would be walking in another photographer's set and have her picture taken with the second guy. That does not make any sense at all. Just my thoughts.
Wrongy, here's my take...., sometimes photographers and models go to a group shoot, or shoot out.
My guess is there were all these naked girls wandering around looking for a lens to get in front of, since that's what they had been paid to do.
But, old farts get tired of carrying heavy dslr's around and shooting constantly, so most were taking a break.
Now, Antonio being the stud he is(he is after all a Latin Lover) and has the ability to KEEP IT UP all day, was getting the lion's share of these exceptional nude Chuladas!! And Models don't take food breaks cause they won't feel skinny, and lounging around naked doesn't look sexy, so they just keep looking for a lens to get in front of.
So wrongy, not sure you got all that, if not, just ask, and I'll repeat it!!!
SS
Ps: Wrongy, smile, it's just a joke!!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.