I know that a jpg degrades slightly every time it is modified and saved. How about renaming or moving jpgs? Does that have any negative effect on them?
If I really like a photo I copy it. Then all the times I use it, I use the copy. If I need a really good one of the original then I go back to that one. You have to use them a lot to see any degradation.
lesdmd
Loc: Middleton Wi via N.Y.C. & Cleveland
Opening and closing does not cause degradation. Each time it is "resaved" creates the problems. Look all you like. Just don't modify and then save again.
Let's say I have an image that I want to go back and tweak occasionally (LR & PS) before I save the final version as a jpg, in what format should I save the intermediate copies?
mremery
Loc: From Maine, living in Virginia
This is where taking photos in RAW format and working in that is a big benefit. To do this, though, you need a full-blown editor like Photoshop or Lightroom.
Working in another image format that is lossless can help. JPEG 2000 has some capability in this regard, but lacks compatibility with other applications so you may have to save first, then save as JPG.
Alternatively, use Photoshop Elements and keep modified files in the PSD format. When you need a copy for use, save as JPG after you do your editing and safe as PSD first.
mremery wrote:
Alternatively, use Photoshop Elements and keep modified files in the PSD format. When you need a copy for use, save as JPG after you do your editing and safe as PSD first.
Do LR, PS, and PSE all save in PSD by default? If so, I could use LR and PS for editing, and when I'm satisfied, convert it to jpg.
Save it as a Tiff . It is a large file with lossless compression.
Emelen wrote:
Save it as a Tiff . It is a large file with lossless compression.
Anything but jpg, huh? OK.
BboH
Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
What you do is load your JPEG, make any modifications you want then do a "Save as" with a different name. Then just close the image and your original is retained in unmodified form. Or, as someone else mentioned - make a copy into a different file, modify it all you want and save the copy - the original remains unchanged - BUT KEEP them in SEPARATE files
BboH wrote:
What you do is load your JPEG, make any modifications you want then do a "Save as" with a different name. Then just close the image and your original is retained in unmodified form. Or, as someone else mentioned - make a copy into a different file, modify it all you want and save the copy - the original remains unchanged - BUT KEEP them in SEPARATE files
I have been doing that, but I often want to go back to the image I have modified and make more changes. For that, I think I will save in PSD.
Thanks for the advice.
jerryc41 wrote:
mremery wrote:
Alternatively, use Photoshop Elements and keep modified files in the PSD format. When you need a copy for use, save as JPG after you do your editing and safe as PSD first.
Do LR, PS, and PSE all save in PSD by default? If so, I could use LR and PS for editing, and when I'm satisfied, convert it to jpg.
They all can.
In LR you can do all your editing, and edit in PS while not leaving LR, and then export the finished product to jpg.
rpavich wrote:
jerryc41 wrote:
mremery wrote:
Alternatively, use Photoshop Elements and keep modified files in the PSD format. When you need a copy for use, save as JPG after you do your editing and safe as PSD first.
Do LR, PS, and PSE all save in PSD by default? If so, I could use LR and PS for editing, and when I'm satisfied, convert it to jpg.
They all can.
In LR you can do all your editing, and edit in PS while not leaving LR, and then export the finished product to jpg.
I guess I'll go back over those 230 original photos and start editing all over again - or maybe not. Now I know what to do the next time. Actually, I don't think there was much harm done opening, editing, and saving maybe three times.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.