jerryc41 wrote:
That is exactly what I did. I selected a picture, modified it, saved it with a different name, and closed it. I repeated that process 100 times, and I have 100 very similar images. I renamed the first one "First Picture" and the last on "Picture #100."
I didn't do this to generate controversy, just to show what happened after I made 100 changes and saves. If you use a different procedure, you would probably get different results.
Thanks Jerryc41 for the feedback. Your software did an excellent job of preserving the original image. I know for most of my processing I never like going past three generations of JPEG. It almost aways starts generating artifacts that I don't want, but then again I am sometimes too much of a pixel peeper.