hj wrote:
I'm not defending the recommendation for a MacMini.... but your response (calling it absurd) seems to assume the OP wants the most powerful computer available. Perhaps he just wants one with normal capability, 1tb storage and 8gb ram. Not everyone wants or needs a supercharged computer.
Agree. But when it comes to value, it is absurd. No one wants to pay more for less. And a "reasonable" photoshop/lightroom computer, given the larger file sizes and software that can do more but requires more processing power and storage, it is absurd.
Going the other way, if I were to configure a computer to match the spec for a maxed out MacMini - it would look like this:
Intel i7 6700k - Quad Core, 3.5 ghz Iris Graphics 5100 with Asus Z170AR mother board $405
16 gb DDR4 ram - $70
1 TB SSD PCI-E drive - $320 (Samsung 850)
case & power supply - $100
wireless keyboard and mouse - $50
Windows10 - $120
Build fee - $130
Total cost - $1210.
Keep in mind the following:
The i7-6700K is a current quad core CPU that is more than double the performance of the 2 yr old Intel Core i7-4578U used in the mini - CPU mark scores are 4679 for the dual core, and 10995 for the quad core.
16 gb DDR4 is faster than DDR3, and the motherboard accommodates up to 64 gb.
The case accommodates up to 10 internal drives - keeping the cost down when adding storage.
You can upgrade to a discrete graphics card of your choice, freeing up system memory for program execution.
Again, I can't imagine why someone would want to spend $2300 on a dead-ended, fully maxed-out, closed-architecture, mac mini - when for half the price you can get a fully upgradeable current processor-based, fast machine with room for lots of internal storage. That is where the absurd part comes in. You don't have to spend super $$$ for super performance, if you keep an open mind. If you value your time and money, the Windows machine makes a lot of sense. If you enjoy waiting for things to happen, don't mind a collection of external drives, external video adapters, and zero upgrade options - and spend more to get that, then Mac is for you.
I support students with both - all the apple users are amazed at how fast my 3 yr old, Intel 2600K/32gb ram/1TB SSD boot drive and internal 4TB RAID 1+0 system is compared to their macbook pros and assortment of other Mac hardware. There is just no comparison. And I built my system for around $1700, when drive capacities where lower and prices were higher. They are all envious, and enjoy coming over to "borrow" my system to process a large pano stitch, HDR, focus stack, 500 mb and larger multilayer image etc because they can do it in a fraction of the time it would take on their machines.
There is a reason why Mac only accounts for 11% market share in personal/workstation computing. And this is up from 9% in 2012.